Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

71654

in McGehee, ArkansasPopulation 4,216

27.94/ 100

Ranked #31,108 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 3.0%)

Ranked #535 of 562 Arkansas ZIPs (bottom 4.9%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Self-care disability

8.1%

in the top 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

15.0%

in the top 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

35.1%

in the top 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

30.1%

in the top 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

10.6%

in the top 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

23%

in the top 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

64.7%

in the top 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

25.2%

in the top 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.46 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

19.8%

in the top 2.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

On the composite measure, McGehee, Arkansas (ZIP 71654) stands in the bottom 3.0% nationally (31,108th) and the bottom 4.9% of Arkansas (535th).

continue reading

Several readings make the pressure on this area plain: modeled self-care disability lands in the top 2.6% nationally, and independent living disability settles in the top 2.6% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health rests in the top 2.6% nationally, and tooth loss lands in the top 3.1% nationally. Modeled vision disability settles in the top 3.7% nationally, modeled cognitive disability rests in the top 2.4% nationally, and floodplain exposure lands in the top 2.1% nationally. Modeled mobility disability settles in the top 3.3% nationally, and utility shutoff rests in the top 2.7% nationally. On the encouraging side, elder services lands in the top 2.6% nationally.

For clarity, floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". ZIP 71638, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 80%

14%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 55%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 5%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 7%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 14%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 3%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 13%

8%

Disability

healthier than 2%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the bottom 0.4%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 66%

14%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 57%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 9%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 10%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 16%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 6%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 23%

8%

Disability

healthier than 6%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the bottom 0.3%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 80.4; chronic-disease standing 5.4 (bottom 10%) — 75 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #765 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.9%29.3–36.4
High blood pressure among adults50.1%45.6–54.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.1%6.4–7.8
Current asthma among adults12.0%10.6–13.5
Coronary heart disease among adults9.6%8.6–10.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults12.4%10.9–13.9
Depression among adults24.2%20.6–28.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults19.2%16.9–21.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.3%35.8–44.7
Obesity among adults46.1%37.6–54.6
Stroke among adults6.0%5.4–6.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years30.1%26.0–35.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years14.9%12.5–17.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.8%76.1–81.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.5%77.1–83.7
Cholesterol screening among adults83.1%80.9–85.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years58.6%53.4–64.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults43.2%39.5–47.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.5%63.6–79.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults11.8%9.5–14.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults22.9%19.7–26.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults44.1%38.6–49.8
Short sleep duration among adults43.3%36.7–51.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults35.1%31.3–39.1
Frequent mental distress among adults21.4%19.1–23.8
Frequent physical distress among adults19.8%17.5–22.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults23.0%20.4–25.5
Any disability among adults46.2%41.3–51.3
Hearing disability among adults9.1%8.1–10.1
Independent living disability among adults15.0%13.3–16.6
Mobility disability among adults25.2%22.3–28.1
Self-care disability among adults8.1%7.2–9.0
Vision disability among adults10.6%9.5–11.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults32.3%28.2–36.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults34.0%30.1–37.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults27.5%24.1–31.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults24.7%21.7–27.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults16.9%14.9–18.9
Loneliness among adults37.7%32.4–43.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults19.8%17.5–22.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AR median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate30.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36416.3% (4.0–30.6%) n=574
Uninsured 18–649.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28611.3% (1.5–24.1%) n=573
No HS diploma (25+)20.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.0% (3.7–23.0%) n=577
Bachelor's or higher (25+)13.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50515.5% (4.4–30.5%) n=577
Unemployment rate (16+)4.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.9% (0.0–11.6%) n=573
Households without a vehicle14.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–12.5%) n=574
Broadband subscription81.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32283.2% (65.0–94.7%) n=574
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)27.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.4% (4.3–33.2%) n=574
Homeownership rate50.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.6% (57.7–96.1%) n=574
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.3% (0.0–5.7%) n=574
Foreign-born population2.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.5%) n=578
Single-parent households42.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.0% (35.3–79.3%) n=571
Population 65+13.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.7% (11.6–37.9%) n=578
Median age37.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.6 yr (33.6–58.1) n=573
Median household income$41,645$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$53,893 ($36,003–$79,139) n=505
Median home value$97,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$128,200 ($73,260–$235,420) n=519
Median gross rent$755$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$800 ($568–$1,094) n=393
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AR median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth72.8 yr ± 1.5878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.2 yr (73.4–79.7) n=580

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.58 years of 72.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured