Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

36020

in Coosada, AlabamaPopulation 1,132

33.14/ 100

Ranked #30,009 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 6.5%)

Ranked #549 of 619 Alabama ZIPs (bottom 11.4%)

Ranked #33 of 41 Montgomery, AL ZIPs (bottom 20%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Short sleep

46.9%

in the top 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

0 per 100,000 residents per year

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

51.7%

in the top 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

0.8 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

49.2%

in the top 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST73rd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

13.3%

in the top 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

40 per million

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

25.9%

in the top 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

30.9%

in the top 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

6.8%

in the top 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST80th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

Coosada, Alabama (ZIP 36020) ranks in the bottom 6.5% nationally (30,009th) and the bottom 11.4% of Alabama (549th).

continue reading

A number of readings press hard on the profile and set its tone: modeled short sleep is in the top 1.4% nationally, and floodplain exposure registers in the top 3.7% nationally. Modeled high blood pressure lies in the top 4.3% nationally, and independent living disability is in the top 5.8% nationally. Modeled air-toxics cancer risk registers in the top 4.5% nationally, tooth loss lies in the top 6.2% nationally, and fair or poor health is in the top 6.8% nationally. Modeled self-care disability registers in the top 6.8% nationally. On the brighter side, fatal road crashes lies at the national minimum, and childcare is in the top 3.8% nationally.

Against its neighbors, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For context, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 36025, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Montgomery, AL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 45%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 49%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 9%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 10%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 29%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 6%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 24%

8%

Disability

healthier than 7%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 3%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 50%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 26%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 23%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 33%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 18%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 8%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 27%

8%

Disability

healthier than 20%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 3%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 40%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 40%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 38%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 20%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 18%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 20%

8%

Disability

healthier than 33%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 8%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 35%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.9%30.4–37.4
High blood pressure among adults49.2%45.0–53.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.9%7.2–8.7
Current asthma among adults11.1%9.8–12.5
Coronary heart disease among adults9.1%8.1–10.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.0%9.5–12.5
Depression among adults23.6%20.2–27.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults18.5%16.3–21.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened42.7%38.4–46.9
Obesity among adults45.2%37.8–52.6
Stroke among adults5.5%5.0–6.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years25.9%21.5–30.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.2%10.0–14.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.9%77.4–82.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.4%78.0–84.5
Cholesterol screening among adults84.5%82.2–86.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.1%56.9–67.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults46.7%42.8–50.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.4%66.4–81.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.6%10.2–15.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults20.6%17.6–23.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults35.0%29.8–40.2
Short sleep duration among adults46.9%40.3–53.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults30.9%27.2–34.8
Frequent mental distress among adults19.7%17.4–22.1
Frequent physical distress among adults17.6%15.4–19.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.8%17.3–22.3
Any disability among adults43.7%38.8–48.7
Hearing disability among adults9.6%8.4–10.7
Independent living disability among adults13.3%11.7–15.1
Mobility disability among adults22.6%19.7–25.5
Self-care disability among adults6.8%6.0–7.7
Vision disability among adults8.7%7.7–9.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults28.5%24.5–32.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults28.8%24.9–33.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults24.4%20.9–28.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults19.3%16.7–22.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults13.9%12.1–15.9
Loneliness among adults36.8%31.6–42.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults14.5%12.6–16.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate20.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.4% (5.1–31.1%) n=623
Uninsured 18–6416.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.7% (5.2–25.2%) n=625
No HS diploma (25+)12.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50513.2% (3.6–23.0%) n=626
Bachelor's or higher (25+)19.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.9% (6.9–38.8%) n=626
Unemployment rate (16+)1.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–11.0%) n=622
Households without a vehicle4.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.0% (0.0–12.1%) n=622
Broadband subscription89.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.9% (68.8–94.9%) n=622
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)13.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (10.1–35.0%) n=622
Homeownership rate89.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (54.7–92.5%) n=622
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.3% (0.0–4.2%) n=622
Foreign-born population0.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–6.2%) n=628
Single-parent households59.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (35.0–68.6%) n=617
Population 65+23.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.9–29.2%) n=628
Median age41.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.3 yr (33.4–52.9) n=621
Median household income$61,161$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,896 ($37,738–$88,230) n=587
Median home value$182,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$160,950 ($87,300–$292,680) n=568
Median gross rent$922$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$856 ($625–$1,266) n=503
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.1 yr ± 1.2778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30874.7 yr (72.1–78.3) n=599

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.27 years of 74.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured