Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

65256

in Harrisburg, MissouriPopulation 2,011

52.66/ 100

Ranked #12,547 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 39%)

Ranked #123 of 993 Missouri ZIPs (top 12.4%)

Ranked #7 of 22 Columbia, MO ZIPs (top 32%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFAS in drinking water

7.0%

in the bottom 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

98%

in the top 7.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

64.9 mi

in the top 7.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

9.9%

in the bottom 24% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US24th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

32.5%

in the bottom 26% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US26th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Harrisburg, Missouri (ZIP 65256) places in the top 39% healthiest ZIPs nationally (12,547th) and the top 12.4% of Missouri (123rd).

continue reading

The clearest bright points in the data come first here: modeled pfas registers in the bottom 3.4% nationally, and home broadband subscription settles in the top 7.5% nationally. Distance to a Superfund site sits in the top 7.6% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise lies at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Childcare rests in the top 11.2% nationally, modeled arsenic resides in the bottom 13.3% nationally, and modeled loneliness is in the bottom 13.3% nationally. Crowded housing lands at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. Modeled industrial-pollution burden stands in the bottom 15% nationally, and homeownership registers in the top 16% nationally.

For readers new to these terms, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 65202, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Columbia, MO metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 61%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 74%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 82%

14%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 54%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 43%

11%

Disability

healthier than 46%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 40%

5%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 39%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 25%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 83%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 81%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 83%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 75%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 82%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 71%

8%

Disability

healthier than 78%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 62%

5%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 21%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 67%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 81%

16%

Environmental Hazard

in the top 0.00%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 62%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 67%

11%

Disability

healthier than 62%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 67%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 48%

8%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 33%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.6%26.7–32.7
High blood pressure among adults35.8%32.4–39.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.2%8.4–10.0
Current asthma among adults10.5%9.4–11.8
Coronary heart disease among adults6.8%6.0–7.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.1%6.9–9.3
Depression among adults24.5%21.5–27.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.5%9.9–13.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.4%34.8–42.2
Obesity among adults32.5%27.6–37.9
Stroke among adults3.5%3.1–3.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.9%8.3–11.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.5%6.1–9.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.4%74.5–80.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.3%75.3–81.0
Cholesterol screening among adults85.1%83.1–86.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.2%62.0–70.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.0%60.9–67.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.4%70.1–81.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.4%14.9–20.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.8%13.1–18.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.9%22.9–31.3
Short sleep duration among adults34.4%30.0–38.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.2%16.6–22.0
Frequent mental distress among adults17.0%15.1–19.0
Frequent physical distress among adults14.2%12.4–16.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.7%14.6–18.9
Any disability among adults35.1%31.0–39.3
Hearing disability among adults8.7%7.7–9.7
Independent living disability among adults8.7%7.5–9.8
Mobility disability among adults15.6%13.4–17.8
Self-care disability among adults3.7%3.2–4.2
Vision disability among adults4.5%4.0–5.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults18.4%15.8–21.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.1%9.2–13.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.7%7.1–10.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.0%8.5–11.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.1%6.2–8.2
Loneliness among adults28.9%25.2–32.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.4%6.4–8.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate14.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.3% (3.2–26.0%) n=1,009
Uninsured 18–649.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.2% (3.5–28.4%) n=1,006
No HS diploma (25+)3.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.5% (2.5–20.5%) n=1,009
Bachelor's or higher (25+)43.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.1% (7.2–40.2%) n=1,009
Unemployment rate (16+)3.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.5%) n=1,003
Households without a vehicle1.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–11.9%) n=1,009
Broadband subscription98.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.3% (72.7–95.2%) n=1,009
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)13.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.7% (8.4–33.9%) n=1,009
Homeownership rate91.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.4% (56.0–94.3%) n=1,009
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–5.1%) n=1,009
Foreign-born population3.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.4%) n=1,010
Single-parent households72.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (39.5–75.6%) n=1,005
Population 65+21.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.2% (11.7–31.1%) n=1,010
Median age51.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.3–55.9) n=1,005
Median household income$92,061$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,740 ($42,457–$95,231) n=948
Median home value$302,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$174,150 ($91,880–$309,500) n=930
Median gross rent$694$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$813 ($553–$1,265) n=786
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.0 yr ± 2.4778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.6–81.0) n=995

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.47 years of 81.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured