Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

64840

in Diamond, MissouriPopulation 3,325

44.54/ 100

Ranked #22,864 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 29%)

Ranked #452 of 993 Missouri ZIPs (top 46%)

Ranked #11 of 31 Joplin, MO-KS ZIPs (top 35%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Distance to a Superfund site

In this ZIP

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.2%

in the bottom 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST15th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

6.4%

in the top 9.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

0.53%

in the top 20% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US80th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, Diamond, Missouri (ZIP 64840) ranks in the bottom 29% nationally (22,864th) and the top 46% of Missouri (452nd).

continue reading

Neither strongly one way nor the other, the measures sit mixed: modeled arsenic is in the bottom 5.6% nationally. Outer-floodplain exposure stands at the national minimum, shared with about 36% of ZIPs. Childcare settles in the top 20% nationally. Against that, distance to a Superfund site lies at the national minimum, crowded housing resides in the top 9.7% nationally, and modeled cognitive disability lands in the top 16% nationally. Recreation registers at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs. Physicians sits at the national minimum, shared with about 38% of ZIPs. Slow internet speeds rests in the top 20% nationally, and modeled fine-particle is in the top 20% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs it borders, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plainer terms, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 64870, about 4.5 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Joplin, MO-KS metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 34%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 39%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 37%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 37%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 29%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 22%

8%

Disability

healthier than 25%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 39%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 36%

5%

Lifting this score

Risk Behavior

healthier than 67%

11%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 50%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 43%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 48%

13%

Disability

healthier than 46%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 59%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 28%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 30%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 37%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 77%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 80%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 70%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 77%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 47%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 50%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 47%

8%

Disability

healthier than 43%

7%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 30%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.3%29.0–35.6
High blood pressure among adults38.7%34.7–42.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.6%8.8–10.5
Current asthma among adults11.0%9.8–12.3
Coronary heart disease among adults8.0%7.2–8.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.7%8.6–10.9
Depression among adults25.7%22.3–29.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.2%11.6–15.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.2%35.1–43.4
Obesity among adults38.4%31.0–46.2
Stroke among adults4.2%3.8–4.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.9%12.6–17.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.9%7.5–10.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.6%76.0–81.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.7%75.3–81.8
Cholesterol screening among adults83.9%81.8–85.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.7%59.3–68.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults61.3%58.0–64.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.8%65.9–79.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.2%12.6–18.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.0%15.5–20.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults30.9%26.3–35.6
Short sleep duration among adults36.7%31.0–42.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.3%19.5–25.3
Frequent mental distress among adults18.5%16.5–20.6
Frequent physical distress among adults16.0%14.2–17.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.7%16.7–20.9
Any disability among adults38.6%34.3–42.9
Hearing disability among adults9.8%8.9–10.9
Independent living disability among adults10.3%9.1–11.6
Mobility disability among adults18.0%15.9–20.4
Self-care disability among adults4.5%4.0–5.0
Vision disability among adults5.6%5.1–6.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.8%17.0–23.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.9%11.8–16.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.9%9.2–12.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.6%10.0–13.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.6%7.5–9.7
Loneliness among adults30.4%26.0–35.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.6%7.6–9.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.3% (3.2–26.0%) n=1,009
Uninsured 18–647.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.2% (3.5–28.4%) n=1,006
No HS diploma (25+)13.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.5% (2.5–20.5%) n=1,009
Bachelor's or higher (25+)23.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.1% (7.2–40.2%) n=1,009
Unemployment rate (16+)4.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.5%) n=1,003
Households without a vehicle3.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–11.9%) n=1,009
Broadband subscription90.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.3% (72.7–95.2%) n=1,009
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)20.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.7% (8.4–33.9%) n=1,009
Homeownership rate72.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.4% (56.0–94.3%) n=1,009
Crowded housing (>1 per room)6.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–5.1%) n=1,009
Foreign-born population2.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.4%) n=1,010
Single-parent households59.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (39.5–75.6%) n=1,005
Population 65+23.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.2% (11.7–31.1%) n=1,010
Median age41.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.3–55.9) n=1,005
Median household income$65,000$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,740 ($42,457–$95,231) n=948
Median home value$225,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$174,150 ($91,880–$309,500) n=930
Median gross rent$705$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$813 ($553–$1,265) n=786
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.9 yr ± 0.9378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.6–81.0) n=995

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.93 years of 77.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured