Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

64833

in Avilla, MissouriPopulation 70

46.94/ 100

Ranked #20,235 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 37%)

Ranked #332 of 993 Missouri ZIPs (top 33%)

Ranked #5 of 31 Joplin, MO-KS ZIPs (top 16%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US2nd
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US4th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

21.2 mi

in the top 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

43.5%

in the top 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

9.7%

in the top 9.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.3%

in the bottom 9.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST26th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

9.5%

in the top 10.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US89th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

92 intersections/sq mi

in the top 11.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US88th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

The read

Judged by its overall standing, Avilla, Missouri (ZIP 64833) sits in the bottom 37% nationally (20,235th) and the top 33% of Missouri (332nd).

continue reading

An even profile, with readings pulling both ways: modeled expected annual loss resides in the bottom 1.9% nationally, home broadband subscription sits at the national maximum, and floodplain exposure stands at the national minimum. Modeled disaster risk resides in the bottom 4.5% nationally. Households without a vehicle sits at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Modeled arsenic stands in the bottom 9.0% nationally. Against that, distance to an emergency room resides in the top 4.7% nationally, and housing-cost burden sits in the top 6.6% nationally. Modeled transportation noise stands in the top 9.0% nationally. Fiber broadband resides at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs.

Placed beside its immediate neighbors, walkability runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put plainly, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 64849, about 17 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Joplin, MO-KS metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 46%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 51%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 46%

8%

Disability

healthier than 41%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 50%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 34%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 30%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 26%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 15%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 72%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 81%

8%

Disability

healthier than 72%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 90%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 50%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 60%

11%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 32%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 35%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 5%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 63%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 97%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 67%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 83%

8%

Disability

healthier than 87%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 43%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 50%

16%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.00%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.2%29.0–37.3
High blood pressure among adults39.9%34.9–44.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.3%9.2–11.4
Current asthma among adults10.4%9.1–11.9
Coronary heart disease among adults7.4%6.3–8.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.9%7.1–10.7
Depression among adults24.0%20.2–28.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.9%10.6–15.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.2%35.6–45.1
Obesity among adults38.9%30.7–47.1
Stroke among adults3.8%3.2–4.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years19.2%15.9–22.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.7%5.6–10.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.8%75.4–81.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.6%76.1–82.9
Cholesterol screening among adults87.5%85.3–89.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.2%60.9–71.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults61.2%57.5–64.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.3%62.6–79.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.6%12.8–18.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.3%13.3–21.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.6%23.5–35.8
Short sleep duration among adults38.7%32.5–45.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.5%16.4–24.5
Frequent mental distress among adults16.6%14.2–19.1
Frequent physical distress among adults15.3%12.7–17.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.1%13.2–19.0
Any disability among adults35.9%30.1–41.6
Hearing disability among adults9.1%7.8–10.5
Independent living disability among adults8.8%7.0–10.4
Mobility disability among adults16.7%13.4–20.0
Self-care disability among adults4.0%3.2–4.8
Vision disability among adults4.8%3.9–5.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.1%15.7–22.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.9%8.1–14.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.5%6.2–11.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.1%7.9–12.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.7%5.4–8.1
Loneliness among adults29.6%24.6–35.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.4%6.0–9.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.3% (3.2–26.0%) n=1,009
Uninsured 18–6416.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.2% (3.5–28.4%) n=1,006
No HS diploma (25+)31.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.5% (2.5–20.5%) n=1,009
Bachelor's or higher (25+)0.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.1% (7.2–40.2%) n=1,009
Unemployment rate (16+)9.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.5%) n=1,003
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–11.9%) n=1,009
Broadband subscription100.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.3% (72.7–95.2%) n=1,009
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)43.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.7% (8.4–33.9%) n=1,009
Homeownership rate78.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.4% (56.0–94.3%) n=1,009
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–5.1%) n=1,009
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.4%) n=1,010
Single-parent households11.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (39.5–75.6%) n=1,005
Population 65+2.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.2% (11.7–31.1%) n=1,010
Median age33.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.3–55.9) n=1,005
Median household income$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,740 ($42,457–$95,231) n=948
Median home value$85,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$174,150 ($91,880–$309,500) n=930
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$813 ($553–$1,265) n=786
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.3 yr ± 1.3878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.6–81.0) n=995

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.38 years of 79.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured