Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

64445

in Elmo, MissouriPopulation 301

44.78/ 100

Ranked #22,641 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 29%)

Ranked #439 of 993 Missouri ZIPs (top 44%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fiber broadband

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3.8 pCi/L

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFAS — man-made “forever chemicals” that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down — were detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Nitrate in drinking water

1.2%

in the top 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

17.8 mi

in the top 9.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

10.6 mi

in the top 9.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

41.6%

in the top 10.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

1.6%

in the bottom 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US16th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Elmo, Missouri (ZIP 64445) lands in the bottom 29% nationally (22,641st) and the top 44% of Missouri (439th).

continue reading

A number of measures mark where this area is under strain: modeled radon sits in the top 3.0% nationally, and PFAS in drinking water is at the national maximum. Modeled nitrate settles in the top 6.2% nationally, and distance to a community health center resides in the top 9.7% nationally. Distance to a nursing home registers in the top 9.9% nationally, and modeled short sleep rests in the top 10.5% nationally. On the brighter side, fiber broadband stands at the national maximum, and modeled transportation noise lies at the national minimum. Households without a vehicle lands at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Modeled loud transportation noise sits at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs.

A note on the terms: radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. PFAS in drinking water is the family of man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Nitrate is a groundwater compound from fertilizer, manure, and sewage, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 51630, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 43%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 56%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 40%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 59%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 25%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 29%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 16%

11%

Disability

healthier than 33%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 7%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 79%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 73%

8%

Disability

healthier than 61%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the top 0.5%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 48%

16%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 38%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 21%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 36%

11%

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.00%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.0%30.2–37.6
High blood pressure among adults40.7%36.4–45.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.8%9.7–11.9
Current asthma among adults10.4%9.2–11.8
Coronary heart disease among adults8.4%7.5–9.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.8%8.4–11.2
Depression among adults24.6%21.0–28.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.4%11.5–15.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.4%37.0–45.9
Obesity among adults39.0%31.6–46.6
Stroke among adults4.2%3.7–4.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years19.0%15.6–22.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.8%6.4–9.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.7%77.9–83.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.5%77.2–83.6
Cholesterol screening among adults86.3%84.4–88.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.4%59.9–70.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults57.7%53.9–61.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.2%67.4–82.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.5%12.8–18.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.5%14.9–20.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults30.6%25.8–35.7
Short sleep duration among adults41.6%35.1–48.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.6%18.6–24.9
Frequent mental distress among adults16.8%14.8–19.0
Frequent physical distress among adults15.8%13.8–18.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.8%14.8–19.0
Any disability among adults38.4%33.7–43.4
Hearing disability among adults10.2%9.0–11.4
Independent living disability among adults9.2%8.1–10.5
Mobility disability among adults17.7%15.2–20.4
Self-care disability among adults4.1%3.6–4.6
Vision disability among adults5.0%4.4–5.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.4%16.3–22.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.6%9.3–14.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.0%7.2–11.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.9%8.2–11.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.9%5.9–8.0
Loneliness among adults29.8%25.2–34.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.1%6.1–8.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.3% (3.2–26.0%) n=1,009
Uninsured 18–647.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.2% (3.5–28.4%) n=1,006
No HS diploma (25+)9.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.5% (2.5–20.5%) n=1,009
Bachelor's or higher (25+)13.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.1% (7.2–40.2%) n=1,009
Unemployment rate (16+)1.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.5%) n=1,003
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–11.9%) n=1,009
Broadband subscription91.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.3% (72.7–95.2%) n=1,009
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)11.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.7% (8.4–33.9%) n=1,009
Homeownership rate69.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.4% (56.0–94.3%) n=1,009
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–5.1%) n=1,009
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.4%) n=1,010
Single-parent households36.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (39.5–75.6%) n=1,005
Population 65+13.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.2% (11.7–31.1%) n=1,010
Median age34.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.3–55.9) n=1,005
Median household income$66,667$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,740 ($42,457–$95,231) n=948
Median home value$98,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$174,150 ($91,880–$309,500) n=930
Median gross rent$620$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$813 ($553–$1,265) n=786
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.4 yr ± 1.6278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.6–81.0) n=995

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.62 years of 77.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured