Skip to main content
ZipVitals

Menu

ZIP code

64433

in Conception, MissouriPopulation 202

ZipVitals Score
How is the ZipVitals Score calculated? →

49.47/ 100

Ranked #16,980 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 47%)

Ranked #214 of 993 Missouri ZIPs (top 22%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Hearing disability

16.9%

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

13.6%

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

26.9%

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US4th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US5th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

48.6%

in the top 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

45.5%

in the top 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

72.8 mi

in the top 6.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

The read

Conception, Missouri (ZIP 64433) ranks in the bottom 47% nationally (16,980th) and the top 22% of Missouri (214th).

continue reading

A number of readings press hard on the profile and set its tone: modeled hearing disability stands in the top 0.2% nationally, and coronary heart disease sits in the top 0.5% nationally. Modeled high blood pressure resides in the top 5.1% nationally, and high cholesterol stands in the top 3.5% nationally. On the brighter side, fiber broadband sits at the national maximum, modeled loneliness resides in the bottom 2.8% nationally, and floodplain exposure stands at the national minimum. Modeled expected annual loss sits in the bottom 4.4% nationally, modeled disaster risk resides in the bottom 4.9% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site stands in the top 6.1% nationally.

For context, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 64480, about 8.5 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 77%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 87%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 78%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 94%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 62%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 42%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 9%

21%

Disability

healthier than 22%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 10%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 83%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 89%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 94%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 81%

11%

Mental Health

in the top 0.00%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the top 0.00%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 10%

21%

Disability

healthier than 39%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 2%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults37.0%32.5–41.3
High blood pressure among adults48.6%43.5–53.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults14.1%12.4–16.0
Current asthma among adults8.3%7.3–9.4
Coronary heart disease among adults13.6%10.9–16.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.2%7.5–13.1
Depression among adults18.4%15.6–21.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.9%13.0–18.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened45.5%40.7–50.4
Obesity among adults35.3%28.3–43.0
Stroke among adults5.6%4.3–7.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years18.6%15.1–22.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.6%5.6–10.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure84.6%81.8–87.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults83.0%79.9–85.9
Cholesterol screening among adults89.1%87.1–90.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.4%65.4–75.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults59.1%55.2–63.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.7%62.9–79.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.2%10.8–15.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.6%11.0–18.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults31.1%24.0–38.4
Short sleep duration among adults39.9%33.5–46.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.4%17.2–28.1
Frequent mental distress among adults12.8%10.9–14.7
Frequent physical distress among adults15.7%12.7–18.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.3%11.5–17.2
Any disability among adults41.9%35.2–48.5
Hearing disability among adults16.9%13.9–19.6
Independent living disability among adults8.6%6.5–10.9
Mobility disability among adults20.0%15.1–24.9
Self-care disability among adults4.4%3.3–5.7
Vision disability among adults5.5%4.1–7.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.0%15.4–23.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.9%6.7–11.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.2%4.5–8.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.3%5.7–9.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.7%4.6–6.9
Loneliness among adults26.9%22.2–32.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.4%4.3–6.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate15.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.3% (3.2–26.0%) n=1,009
Uninsured 18–644.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.2% (3.5–28.4%) n=1,006
No HS diploma (25+)3.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.5% (2.5–20.5%) n=1,009
Bachelor's or higher (25+)28.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.1% (7.2–40.2%) n=1,009
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.5%) n=1,003
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–11.9%) n=1,009
Broadband subscription83.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.3% (72.7–95.2%) n=1,009
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)12.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.7% (8.4–33.9%) n=1,009
Homeownership rate87.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.4% (56.0–94.3%) n=1,009
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–5.1%) n=1,009
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.4%) n=1,010
Single-parent households36.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (39.5–75.6%) n=1,005
Population 65+23.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.2% (11.7–31.1%) n=1,010
Median age27.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.3–55.9) n=1,005
Median household income$50,417$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,740 ($42,457–$95,231) n=948
Median home value$114,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$174,150 ($91,880–$309,500) n=930
Median gross rent—$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$813 ($553–$1,265) n=786
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.1 yr ± 1.7978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.6–81.0) n=995

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.79 years of 81.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured