Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

64434

in Conception Junction, MissouriPopulation 494

48.61/ 100

Ranked #18,181 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 43%)

Ranked #249 of 993 Missouri ZIPs (top 25%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Distance to a Superfund site

69.9 mi

in the top 6.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

97.8%

in the top 7.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.15%

in the bottom 9.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST15th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

13.2 mi

in the top 14.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US85th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Radon

2.3 pCi/L

in the top 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US75th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, Conception Junction, Missouri (ZIP 64434) lands in the bottom 43% nationally (18,181st) and the top 25% of Missouri (249th).

continue reading

Reading the numbers as a whole, the picture lands somewhere in between: distance to a Superfund site stands in the top 6.6% nationally, fiber broadband rests in the top 7.0% nationally, and modeled transportation noise registers in the bottom 9.3% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise resides at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Crowded housing settles at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. Modeled industrial-pollution burden is in the bottom 16% nationally. On the other side, PFAS in drinking water sits in the top 13.9% nationally, and modeled hearing disability lands in the top 13.5% nationally. Distance to a community health center lies in the top 14.6% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility stands at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs.

Put simply, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. PFAS in drinking water is the family of man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. On the overall standing, ZIP 64432, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 68%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 73%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 65%

13%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 44%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 31%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 30%

11%

Disability

healthier than 35%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 34%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 16%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 74%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 71%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 87%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 68%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 79%

8%

Disability

healthier than 64%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 47%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 42%

5%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 7%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.9%29.5–36.7
High blood pressure among adults39.8%35.8–44.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.9%9.8–12.0
Current asthma among adults10.5%9.2–11.8
Coronary heart disease among adults8.6%7.6–9.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.1%7.8–10.4
Depression among adults24.4%21.0–28.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.1%11.3–15.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.9%36.5–45.4
Obesity among adults37.4%30.5–45.3
Stroke among adults4.1%3.7–4.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.8%12.0–17.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.5%6.0–9.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.9%78.2–83.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.8%77.5–83.9
Cholesterol screening among adults86.4%84.4–88.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.8%61.8–71.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.2%59.5–66.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.6%66.7–81.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.3%12.6–18.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.6%13.0–18.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.2%24.5–34.3
Short sleep duration among adults39.8%33.5–46.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.8%17.8–23.8
Frequent mental distress among adults16.5%14.6–18.7
Frequent physical distress among adults15.2%13.2–17.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.6%14.4–18.8
Any disability among adults37.8%33.2–42.8
Hearing disability among adults10.5%9.4–11.8
Independent living disability among adults8.9%7.8–10.2
Mobility disability among adults16.9%14.7–19.4
Self-care disability among adults3.9%3.4–4.4
Vision disability among adults4.9%4.3–5.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.0%16.0–22.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.9%8.8–13.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.0%6.4–10.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.4%7.7–11.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.8%5.8–8.0
Loneliness among adults30.0%25.4–35.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.7%5.6–7.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate15.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.3% (3.2–26.0%) n=1,009
Uninsured 18–645.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.2% (3.5–28.4%) n=1,006
No HS diploma (25+)2.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.5% (2.5–20.5%) n=1,009
Bachelor's or higher (25+)24.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.1% (7.2–40.2%) n=1,009
Unemployment rate (16+)2.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.5%) n=1,003
Households without a vehicle0.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–11.9%) n=1,009
Broadband subscription86.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.3% (72.7–95.2%) n=1,009
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)17.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.7% (8.4–33.9%) n=1,009
Homeownership rate81.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.4% (56.0–94.3%) n=1,009
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–5.1%) n=1,009
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.4%) n=1,010
Single-parent households76.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (39.5–75.6%) n=1,005
Population 65+21.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.2% (11.7–31.1%) n=1,010
Median age54.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.3–55.9) n=1,005
Median household income$73,750$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,740 ($42,457–$95,231) n=948
Median home value$152,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$174,150 ($91,880–$309,500) n=930
Median gross rent$471$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$813 ($553–$1,265) n=786
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.1 yr ± 1.7978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.6–81.0) n=995

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.79 years of 81.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured