ZIP code
65674
in Humansville, MissouriPopulation 2,896
38.39/ 100
Ranked #27,789 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 13.4%)
Ranked #754 of 993 Missouri ZIPs (bottom 24%)
Ranked #44 of 52 Springfield, MO ZIPs (bottom 15%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Elder-services access
0.69 per 1,000 residents
in the top 1.5% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.
Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.
Full methodology ›Industrial-pollution burden
in the bottom 2.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST2ndUS3rdDefinition & source ›
The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.
Full methodology ›Hearing disability
11.8%
in the top 5.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST86thUS95thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.
Full methodology ›Crowded housing
9.4%
in the top 5.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST97thUS95thDefinition & source ›
The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.
Full methodology ›Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility
18.7 mi
in the top 5.5% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST96thUS95thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.
Full methodology ›Mobility disability
21.9%
in the top 10.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST80thUS90thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.
Full methodology ›Coronary heart disease
10.0%
in the top 9.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST86thUS90thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.
Full methodology ›The read
In overall standing, Humansville, Missouri (ZIP 65674) comes out in the bottom 13.4% nationally (27,789th) and the bottom 24% of Missouri (754th), based on limited data; treat as directional.
The data points to real strain across a number of measures here: modeled hearing disability registers in the top 5.2% nationally, crowded housing stands in the top 5.1% nationally, and modeled mobility disability lands in the top 10.0% nationally. Modeled cognitive disability is in the top 10.3% nationally, modeled coronary heart disease resides in the top 9.7% nationally, and poverty rests in the top 12.1% nationally. On the brighter side, elder services lies in the top 1.5% nationally, and modeled industrial-pollution burden sits in the bottom 2.6% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility settles in the top 5.5% nationally. Distance to a community health center registers at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs.
Relative to the ZIPs around it, elder services runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain terms, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Distance to a community health center is a federally funded (HRSA) community health center serving everyone regardless of ability to pay. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 65613, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Springfield, MO metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 71%
14%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 79%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 12%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 15%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 30%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 13%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 25%
8%
Disability
healthier than 10%
7%
Climate / Disaster RiskPartial
healthier than 26%
5%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 67%
14%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 85%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 13%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 13%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 35%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 30%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 39%
8%
Disability
healthier than 15%
7%
Climate / Disaster RiskPartial
healthier than 22%
5%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 71%
14%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 86%
5%
About typical
Preventive Care
healthier than 46%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 42%
8%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 8%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 10%
16%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 28%
11%
Disability
healthier than 7%
7%
Climate / Disaster RiskPartial
in the bottom 0.00%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
64738
Missourishares a border
Score 38.34
Closest healthier
65613
Missourishares a border
Score 41.98
Similar health profile
65438
Missouri100% similar profile
Score 40.57
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 35.5% | 32.7–38.4 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 42.9% | 39.7–46.4 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 10.6% | 9.8–11.5 |
| Current asthma among adults | 11.0% | 10.0–12.2 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 10.0% | 9.1–11.0 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 12.2% | 11.0–13.7 |
| Depression among adults | 25.4% | 22.5–28.5 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 15.6% | 14.0–17.4 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 42.2% | 38.6–45.9 |
| Obesity among adults | 39.8% | 33.8–46.4 |
| Stroke among adults | 5.1% | 4.6–5.5 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 20.5% | 17.7–23.3 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 9.9% | 8.4–11.6 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 80.9% | 78.8–82.9 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 79.8% | 77.1–82.3 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 84.0% | 82.2–85.6 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 62.1% | 57.7–65.9 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 53.4% | 50.3–56.4 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 71.5% | 64.6–77.2 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 14.5% | 12.4–16.8 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 20.3% | 17.9–22.9 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 35.5% | 31.4–39.7 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 38.1% | 32.7–43.0 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 26.5% | 23.8–29.4 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 18.2% | 16.5–20.0 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 17.9% | 16.3–19.8 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 19.8% | 17.8–21.8 |
| Any disability among adults | 43.3% | 39.4–47.1 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 11.8% | 10.8–13.0 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 11.9% | 10.7–13.2 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 21.9% | 19.7–24.4 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 5.6% | 5.0–6.2 |
| Vision disability among adults | 6.9% | 6.3–7.7 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 19.2% | 16.6–22.0 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 16.2% | 14.0–18.6 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 14.1% | 12.1–16.3 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 12.3% | 10.7–13.9 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 9.5% | 8.4–10.6 |
| Loneliness among adults | 31.0% | 27.0–35.0 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 9.6% | 8.5–10.8 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | MO median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 24.0% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 12.3% (3.2–26.0%) n=1,009 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 16.9% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 13.2% (3.5–28.4%) n=1,006 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 21.7% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 9.5% (2.5–20.5%) n=1,009 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 10.5% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 18.1% (7.2–40.2%) n=1,009 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 6.8% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 2.9% (0.0–8.5%) n=1,003 |
| Households without a vehicle | 7.3% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.1% (0.0–11.9%) n=1,009 |
| Broadband subscription | 79.1% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 86.3% (72.7–95.2%) n=1,009 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 25.2% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 20.7% (8.4–33.9%) n=1,009 |
| Homeownership rate | 69.5% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 79.4% (56.0–94.3%) n=1,009 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 9.4% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 1.1% (0.0–5.1%) n=1,009 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.1% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 0.8% (0.0–6.4%) n=1,010 |
| Single-parent households | 49.1% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 55.0% (39.5–75.6%) n=1,005 |
| Population 65+ | 18.2% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 19.2% (11.7–31.1%) n=1,010 |
| Median age | 39.8 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 41.5 yr (33.3–55.9) n=1,005 |
| Median household income | $47,500 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $61,740 ($42,457–$95,231) n=948 |
| Median home value | $137,000 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $174,150 ($91,880–$309,500) n=930 |
| Median gross rent | $642 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $813 ($553–$1,265) n=786 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | MO median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 77.5 yr ± 0.58 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 77.6 yr (74.6–81.0) n=995 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.58 years of 77.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured