Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

63862

in Lilbourn, MissouriPopulation 1,237

30.52/ 100

Ranked #30,656 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 4.4%)

Ranked #941 of 993 Missouri ZIPs (bottom 5.3%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Cognitive disability

23%

in the top 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

14.4%

in the top 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

45.4%

in the top 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

27.7%

in the top 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

46.8%

in the top 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

24.1%

in the top 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

7.0%

in the top 5.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

31.5%

in the top 5.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

16.9%

in the top 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

14.7%

in the top 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Lilbourn, Missouri (ZIP 63862) ranks in the bottom 4.4% nationally (30,656th) and the bottom 5.3% of Missouri (941st), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

Several measures weigh most on this area's profile, and they come first: modeled cognitive disability resides in the top 2.4% nationally, and independent living disability registers in the top 3.5% nationally. Modeled short sleep rests in the top 2.6% nationally, and tooth loss stands in the top 4.6% nationally. Modeled obesity lies in the top 2.3% nationally, mobility disability lands in the top 4.7% nationally, and self-care disability sits in the top 5.9% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health is in the top 5.9% nationally, utility shutoff settles in the top 4.7% nationally, and transportation resides in the top 6.8% nationally.

Close by, ZIP 63848, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall. Modeled tooth loss resides in the top 4.6% nationally.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 55%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 53%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 7%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 8%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 14%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 2%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 12%

8%

Disability

healthier than 4%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 20%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 45%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 58%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 9%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 5%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 8%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 2%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 11%

8%

Disability

healthier than 5%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 13%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.5%31.1–38.0
High blood pressure among adults45.7%41.6–50.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.8%7.1–8.6
Current asthma among adults12.2%10.8–13.7
Coronary heart disease among adults9.2%8.3–10.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults12.4%11.1–13.9
Depression among adults25.4%22.0–29.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults17.7%15.6–19.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.3%35.3–43.6
Obesity among adults46.8%39.5–54.3
Stroke among adults5.5%5.0–6.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years27.7%23.4–32.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.5%10.4–14.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.3%76.7–81.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.0%75.6–82.2
Cholesterol screening among adults82.3%80.1–84.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years58.9%53.6–64.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults45.6%41.9–49.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years70.4%62.4–77.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.5%10.2–15.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults24.0%21.0–27.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults42.4%37.3–47.7
Short sleep duration among adults45.4%38.8–52.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults31.5%28.0–35.1
Frequent mental distress among adults20.7%18.5–23.1
Frequent physical distress among adults19.1%17.0–21.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults23.0%20.5–25.6
Any disability among adults46.9%42.2–51.8
Hearing disability among adults9.8%8.8–11.0
Independent living disability among adults14.4%12.8–16.1
Mobility disability among adults24.1%21.3–26.9
Self-care disability among adults7.0%6.3–7.8
Vision disability among adults8.8%8.0–9.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.4%20.9–27.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults27.5%23.9–31.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults26.1%22.8–29.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults21.1%18.4–24.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults14.7%13.0–16.6
Loneliness among adults34.7%29.6–39.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults16.9%14.9–19.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate28.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.3% (3.2–26.0%) n=1,009
Uninsured 18–6422.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.2% (3.5–28.4%) n=1,006
No HS diploma (25+)19.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.5% (2.5–20.5%) n=1,009
Bachelor's or higher (25+)8.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.1% (7.2–40.2%) n=1,009
Unemployment rate (16+)2.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.5%) n=1,003
Households without a vehicle7.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–11.9%) n=1,009
Broadband subscription89.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.3% (72.7–95.2%) n=1,009
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.7% (8.4–33.9%) n=1,009
Homeownership rate60.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.4% (56.0–94.3%) n=1,009
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–5.1%) n=1,009
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.4%) n=1,010
Single-parent households41.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (39.5–75.6%) n=1,005
Population 65+18.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.2% (11.7–31.1%) n=1,010
Median age37.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.3–55.9) n=1,005
Median household income$43,940$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,740 ($42,457–$95,231) n=948
Median home value$81,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$174,150 ($91,880–$309,500) n=930
Median gross rent$692$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$813 ($553–$1,265) n=786
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.6 yr ± 1.3578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.6–81.0) n=995

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.35 years of 78.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured