Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

38257

in South Fulton, TennesseePopulation 4,437

39.97/ 100

Ranked #26,781 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 16%)

Ranked #336 of 616 Tennessee ZIPs (bottom 45%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Elder-services access

0.24 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

12.3%

in the bottom 8.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

46%

in the top 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST81st
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

0.49 per 1,000 residents

in the top 11.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

4.5 per 100,000 residents per year

in the bottom 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US17th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

1.1%

in the top 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US82nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

The read

Judged by its overall standing, South Fulton, Tennessee (ZIP 38257) sits in the bottom 16% nationally (26,781st) and the bottom 45% of Tennessee (336th).

continue reading

A balanced showing across the data, with a few readings each side: elder services stands in the top 5.8% nationally, modeled binge drinking resides in the bottom 8.5% nationally, and childcare sits in the top 11.3% nationally. On the other hand, modeled mobility disability stands in the top 11.0% nationally, high blood pressure resides in the top 9.8% nationally, and diabetes sits in the top 11.4% nationally. Modeled expected annual loss stands in the top 12.9% nationally, and coronary heart disease resides in the top 12.3% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health sits in the top 14.9% nationally, and high cholesterol stands in the top 11.6% nationally.

Put plainly, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 38237, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 79%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 67%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 59%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 40%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 10%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 28%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 7%

8%

Disability

healthier than 14%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 29%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 65%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 83%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 70%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 70%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 56%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 59%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 24%

21%

Disability

healthier than 32%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 21%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 79.5; chronic-disease standing 9.8 (bottom 10%) — 70 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #1,090 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults38.7%35.1–42.3
High blood pressure among adults46.0%41.7–50.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.5%9.5–11.5
Current asthma among adults11.3%10.1–12.7
Coronary heart disease among adults9.7%8.6–10.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults12.0%10.5–13.7
Depression among adults29.6%25.8–33.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults17.1%14.9–19.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened42.8%38.3–47.2
Obesity among adults39.6%32.1–47.7
Stroke among adults5.0%4.5–5.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years18.2%15.1–21.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.6%9.5–14.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.4%77.7–82.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.1%76.5–83.3
Cholesterol screening among adults87.7%85.8–89.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.2%58.0–68.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults56.5%52.7–60.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.6%64.2–79.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.3%9.9–14.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults20.3%17.5–23.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults31.7%26.9–36.7
Short sleep duration among adults39.1%32.4–46.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults27.3%24.0–30.9
Frequent mental distress among adults19.4%17.3–21.6
Frequent physical distress among adults18.1%16.0–20.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.7%16.6–21.1
Any disability among adults41.9%37.4–46.7
Hearing disability among adults10.3%9.1–11.5
Independent living disability among adults11.4%10.1–12.9
Mobility disability among adults21.6%18.9–24.5
Self-care disability among adults5.3%4.7–6.0
Vision disability among adults6.8%6.0–7.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate18.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.1–26.1%) n=609
Uninsured 18–648.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.0% (5.9–24.0%) n=615
No HS diploma (25+)13.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.6% (4.2–19.5%) n=613
Bachelor's or higher (25+)16.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.0% (10.0–42.6%) n=613
Unemployment rate (16+)2.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.0% (0.4–9.6%) n=613
Households without a vehicle4.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.3–10.1%) n=608
Broadband subscription84.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.7% (76.0–94.9%) n=608
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)22.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.4% (11.8–33.6%) n=608
Homeownership rate72.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.7% (53.4–91.5%) n=608
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–4.5%) n=608
Foreign-born population0.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.0–8.3%) n=617
Single-parent households47.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.6% (39.1–68.7%) n=608
Population 65+22.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.5–27.9%) n=617
Median age45.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (33.8–52.5) n=615
Median household income$58,849$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,577 ($42,745–$94,822) n=594
Median home value$103,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,100 ($120,900–$397,120) n=593
Median gross rent$795$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$908 ($659–$1,523) n=516
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.4 yr ± 1.1378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.1 yr (72.6–78.1) n=587

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.13 years of 76.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured