Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

63852

in Holcomb, MissouriPopulation 1,172

30.71/ 100

Ranked #30,615 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 4.6%)

Ranked #939 of 993 Missouri ZIPs (bottom 5.5%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Cognitive disability

22.9%

in the top 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

13.3%

in the top 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

55.6%

in the bottom 5.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST2nd
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

46%

in the top 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

23.1%

in the top 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

29.8%

in the top 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

24.2%

in the top 8.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

68.3%

in the bottom 8.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST7th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.01%

in the bottom 11.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST6th
US11th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

11.7%

in the top 14.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US86th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

Holcomb, Missouri (ZIP 63852), overall, ranks in the bottom 4.6% nationally (30,615th) and the bottom 5.5% of Missouri (939th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

Reading the numbers as a whole, the picture lands somewhere in between: modeled cognitive disability registers in the top 2.6% nationally. On the other side, modeled independent living disability resides in the top 5.8% nationally, colon screening settles in the bottom 5.6% nationally, and obesity is in the top 3.1% nationally. Modeled mobility disability sits in the top 6.6% nationally, and fair or poor health lands in the top 8.7% nationally. Modeled tooth loss lies in the top 8.4% nationally, and mammography stands in the bottom 8.3% nationally. Slow internet speeds rests in the top 10.9% nationally, and modeled tree cover registers in the bottom 11.3% nationally.

ZIP 63827, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall. Modeled obesity registers in the top 3.1% nationally.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 42%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 11%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 9%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 31%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 10%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 4%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 8%

8%

Disability

healthier than 6%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 17%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 47%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 12%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 6%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 23%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 3%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 5%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 4%

8%

Disability

healthier than 8%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 10%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.5%30.7–37.9
High blood pressure among adults42.9%38.5–46.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.9%8.0–9.8
Current asthma among adults11.6%10.2–13.0
Coronary heart disease among adults9.2%8.1–10.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults12.6%10.9–14.2
Depression among adults27.8%23.8–31.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.5%13.4–17.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.3%36.0–44.4
Obesity among adults46.0%38.7–52.8
Stroke among adults4.8%4.3–5.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years24.2%20.4–28.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years13.1%10.9–15.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.9%75.0–80.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.4%73.8–80.7
Cholesterol screening among adults81.6%79.2–83.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years55.6%50.6–60.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults50.6%46.9–54.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years68.3%59.8–75.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.3%11.7–17.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults23.8%20.5–27.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults41.8%36.4–47.1
Short sleep duration among adults38.8%32.9–44.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults29.8%26.1–33.4
Frequent mental distress among adults20.5%18.1–22.9
Frequent physical distress among adults19.8%17.4–22.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults22.9%20.2–25.6
Any disability among adults46.5%41.3–51.2
Hearing disability among adults10.8%9.5–12.0
Independent living disability among adults13.3%11.6–15.0
Mobility disability among adults23.1%20.2–25.9
Self-care disability among adults6.1%5.3–6.9
Vision disability among adults7.7%6.8–8.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.4%18.5–24.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults21.2%17.8–24.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults18.7%15.6–21.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.2%14.0–18.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults11.7%10.2–13.3
Loneliness among adults34.6%30.2–39.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults12.0%10.5–13.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate16.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.3% (3.2–26.0%) n=1,009
Uninsured 18–6415.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.2% (3.5–28.4%) n=1,006
No HS diploma (25+)20.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.5% (2.5–20.5%) n=1,009
Bachelor's or higher (25+)11.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.1% (7.2–40.2%) n=1,009
Unemployment rate (16+)2.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.5%) n=1,003
Households without a vehicle4.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–11.9%) n=1,009
Broadband subscription88.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.3% (72.7–95.2%) n=1,009
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)18.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.7% (8.4–33.9%) n=1,009
Homeownership rate74.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.4% (56.0–94.3%) n=1,009
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–5.1%) n=1,009
Foreign-born population8.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.4%) n=1,010
Single-parent households52.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (39.5–75.6%) n=1,005
Population 65+15.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.2% (11.7–31.1%) n=1,010
Median age41.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.3–55.9) n=1,005
Median household income$46,971$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,740 ($42,457–$95,231) n=948
Median home value$92,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$174,150 ($91,880–$309,500) n=930
Median gross rent$539$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$813 ($553–$1,265) n=786
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.9 yr ± 1.2078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.6–81.0) n=995

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.20 years of 76.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured