Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

63769

in Oak Ridge, MissouriPopulation 1,358

53.43/ 100

Ranked #11,469 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 36%)

Ranked #104 of 993 Missouri ZIPs (top 10.5%)

Ranked #2 of 24 Cape Girardeau, MO-IL ZIPs (top 8.4%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Child-care access

1.4 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

73.6 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

7.2%

in the bottom 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

2.4%

in the bottom 7.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

95.5%

in the top 8.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

5.3 ppb

in the top 9.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

US91st
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

9.3%

in the bottom 14.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US15th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

10.8 mi

in the top 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US82nd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

6.0%

in the bottom 22% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US22nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

8.5%

in the bottom 23% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US23rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Oak Ridge, Missouri (ZIP 63769) sits in the top 36% healthiest ZIPs nationally (11,469th) and the top 10.5% of Missouri (104th).

continue reading

The readings split fairly evenly between strengths and concerns: childcare rests in the top 1.0% nationally, modeled pfas sits in the bottom 3.6% nationally, and poverty registers in the bottom 7.7% nationally. Homeownership lands in the top 8.0% nationally, housing-cost burden resides in the bottom 10.5% nationally, and modeled loneliness lies in the bottom 14.1% nationally. Crowded housing settles at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. Working the other way, fatal road crashes stands in the top 1.2% nationally, and lead in tap water is in the top 9.2% nationally. Modeled industrial-pollution burden rests in the top 12.7% nationally.

In plain language, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. ZIP 63747, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Cape Girardeau, MO-IL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 80%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 72%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 70%

13%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 49%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 48%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 59%

8%

Disability

healthier than 53%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 42%

5%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 19%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 71%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 87%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 68%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 90%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 85%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 92%

8%

Disability

healthier than 83%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 66%

5%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 13%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 74%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 91%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 96%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 91%

11%

Mental Health

in the top 0.00%

8%

Disability

healthier than 87%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 83%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 57%

14%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 22%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.8%28.1–35.2
High blood pressure among adults39.0%34.7–43.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.4%9.4–11.5
Current asthma among adults10.1%8.9–11.3
Coronary heart disease among adults7.4%6.6–8.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.1%7.0–9.4
Depression among adults23.1%19.6–26.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.2%10.5–14.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.1%35.8–44.3
Obesity among adults34.3%27.7–40.8
Stroke among adults3.7%3.3–4.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.8%9.5–14.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.6%5.3–8.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.3%77.2–82.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.6%77.4–83.5
Cholesterol screening among adults87.9%86.1–89.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.8%62.9–72.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.3%59.6–66.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.0%66.2–80.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.1%13.3–19.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.0%12.6–17.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.3%22.9–32.1
Short sleep duration among adults35.9%30.1–42.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.8%16.1–22.0
Frequent mental distress among adults15.8%13.9–17.9
Frequent physical distress among adults14.3%12.5–16.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.8%12.9–17.0
Any disability among adults34.2%29.8–38.8
Hearing disability among adults9.2%8.1–10.3
Independent living disability among adults7.9%6.9–9.1
Mobility disability among adults15.7%13.5–18.2
Self-care disability among adults3.5%3.1–4.0
Vision disability among adults4.3%3.8–4.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults17.6%14.7–21.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.3%7.4–11.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.8%5.4–8.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.5%7.0–10.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.0%5.1–7.0
Loneliness among adults29.0%24.4–33.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.2%5.2–7.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate2.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.3% (3.2–26.0%) n=1,009
Uninsured 18–645.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.2% (3.5–28.4%) n=1,006
No HS diploma (25+)7.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.5% (2.5–20.5%) n=1,009
Bachelor's or higher (25+)27.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.1% (7.2–40.2%) n=1,009
Unemployment rate (16+)3.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.5%) n=1,003
Households without a vehicle2.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–11.9%) n=1,009
Broadband subscription91.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.3% (72.7–95.2%) n=1,009
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)10.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.7% (8.4–33.9%) n=1,009
Homeownership rate95.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.4% (56.0–94.3%) n=1,009
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–5.1%) n=1,009
Foreign-born population1.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.4%) n=1,010
Single-parent households66.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (39.5–75.6%) n=1,005
Population 65+23.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.2% (11.7–31.1%) n=1,010
Median age49.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.3–55.9) n=1,005
Median household income$91,146$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,740 ($42,457–$95,231) n=948
Median home value$195,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$174,150 ($91,880–$309,500) n=930
Median gross rent$630$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$813 ($553–$1,265) n=786
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.5 yr ± 1.5078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.6–81.0) n=995

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.50 years of 79.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured