ZIP code
53167
in Rochester, WisconsinPopulation 157
60.23/ 100
Ranked #4,684 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 14.7%)
Ranked #94 of 763 Wisconsin ZIPs (top 12.4%)
Ranked #1 of 13 Racine-Mount Pleasant, WI ZIPs (top 7.7%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Loneliness
26%
in the bottom 1.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST2ndUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.
Full methodology ›Natural-disaster risk
in the bottom 2.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST5thUS2ndDefinition & source ›
This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.
Full methodology ›Home broadband subscription
100%
at the national maximum
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.
Full methodology ›Park land
45.9%
in the top 2.8% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST98thUS97thDefinition & source ›
The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.
Full methodology ›Mammography
83.5%
in the top 1.8% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST95thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.
Full methodology ›Poverty rate
0.64%
in the bottom 5.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS5thDefinition & source ›
The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.
Full methodology ›Utility shut-off threat
4.3%
in the bottom 5.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST17thUS6thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›PFAS in drinking water
61.3%
in the top 7.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST97thUS93rdDefinition & source ›
The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.
A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.
Full methodology ›Lack of transportation
5.0%
in the bottom 7.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST11thUS8thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›Expected annual disaster loss
$0
in the bottom 12.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST6thUS12thDefinition & source ›
FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.
Full methodology ›The read
Rochester, Wisconsin (ZIP 53167), on the composite measure, lands in the top 14.7% healthiest ZIPs nationally (4,684th) and the top 12.4% of Wisconsin (94th).
Where the data leans one way, another reading answers it: modeled loneliness rests in the bottom 1.1% nationally, modeled disaster risk sits in the bottom 2.5% nationally, and home broadband subscription registers at the national maximum. Park land lands in the top 2.8% nationally, modeled mammography resides in the top 1.8% nationally, and poverty lies in the bottom 5.0% nationally. Modeled utility shutoff settles in the bottom 5.7% nationally. Unemployment stands at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Modeled transportation is in the bottom 7.6% nationally. On the other hand, modeled pfas rests in the top 7.5% nationally.
Set against the neighboring ZIPs, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In everyday language, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 53120, about 1.7 miles away.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Racine-Mount Pleasant, WI metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 69%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 96%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 79%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 88%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 72%
8%
Disability
healthier than 85%
7%
About typical
Risk Behavior
healthier than 51%
11%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 45%
5%
Holding it back
Healthcare Access
healthier than 17%
5%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 73%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 98%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 86%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 80%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 69%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 77%
8%
Disability
healthier than 88%
7%
Holding it back
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 14%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 16%
5%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 90%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
in the top 0.00%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 90%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 80%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 90%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 60%
8%
Disability
in the top 0.00%
7%
Holding it back
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 10%
5%
Healthcare Access
in the bottom 0.00%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
53105
Wisconsinshares a border
Score 56.80
Closest healthier
53120
Wisconsinabout 1.7 mi away
Score 60.25
Similar health profile
53578
Wisconsin97% similar profile
Score 58.44
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 28.5% | 25.4–31.8 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 33.1% | 29.7–36.7 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 9.3% | 8.4–10.4 |
| Current asthma among adults | 11.1% | 9.9–12.6 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 6.0% | 5.1–7.0 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 5.8% | 4.6–7.2 |
| Depression among adults | 23.0% | 20.2–26.4 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 10.9% | 9.3–12.7 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 34.1% | 30.9–37.6 |
| Obesity among adults | 40.6% | 35.6–46.2 |
| Stroke among adults | 3.0% | 2.5–3.5 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 8.3% | 6.7–10.3 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 5.9% | 4.5–7.9 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 78.2% | 75.1–81.4 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 78.0% | 75.0–81.0 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 89.2% | 87.3–90.9 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 69.0% | 64.9–72.9 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 69.8% | 66.9–72.6 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 83.5% | 78.5–87.7 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 18.9% | 16.2–22.2 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 13.6% | 10.5–17.0 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 25.9% | 21.4–31.0 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 32.6% | 28.8–36.7 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 15.4% | 12.6–18.8 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 14.4% | 12.6–16.7 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 12.2% | 10.4–14.4 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 11.6% | 9.7–13.9 |
| Any disability among adults | 26.2% | 22.2–30.7 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 6.2% | 5.3–7.1 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 6.5% | 5.4–7.8 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 11.9% | 9.7–14.3 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 3.0% | 2.5–3.7 |
| Vision disability among adults | 3.5% | 2.9–4.2 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 18.8% | 15.8–22.3 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 8.8% | 6.7–11.5 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 8.0% | 6.0–10.6 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 7.5% | 5.9–9.4 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 5.0% | 4.1–6.1 |
| Loneliness among adults | 26.0% | 22.3–29.9 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 4.3% | 3.5–5.3 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | WI median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 0.6% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 8.5% (3.6–16.0%) n=765 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 0.0% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 6.7% (2.4–14.9%) n=764 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 14.0% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 5.9% (2.3–12.6%) n=768 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 0.0% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 23.5% (12.7–44.0%) n=768 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 2.6% (0.9–5.6%) n=763 |
| Households without a vehicle | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 3.6% (0.8–9.0%) n=764 |
| Broadband subscription | 100.0% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 88.8% (80.0–94.8%) n=764 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 26.9% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 21.8% (14.7–29.1%) n=764 |
| Homeownership rate | 74.2% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 81.3% (62.1–91.8%) n=764 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 1.1% (0.0–3.7%) n=764 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 1.9% (0.3–6.8%) n=768 |
| Single-parent households | 100.0% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 59.0% (47.7–72.8%) n=762 |
| Population 65+ | 47.1% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 20.4% (13.9–32.2%) n=768 |
| Median age | 64.8 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 44.2 yr (36.2–56.1) n=765 |
| Median household income | $70,054 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $75,147 ($57,542–$101,625) n=755 |
| Median home value | $345,200 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $231,900 ($160,140–$367,300) n=755 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $914 ($696–$1,261) n=706 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | WI median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 82.7 yr ± 2.16 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 80.4 yr (77.7–83.6) n=712 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.16 years of 82.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured