Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

63743

in Daisy, MissouriPopulation 64

53.16/ 100

Ranked #11,840 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 37%)

Ranked #113 of 993 Missouri ZIPs (top 11.4%)

Ranked #3 of 24 Cape Girardeau, MO-IL ZIPs (top 12.5%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFAS in drinking water

5.1%

in the bottom 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

5.4 ppb

in the top 8.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

US91st
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 9.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US9th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$122,750

in the top 8.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

10 mi

in the top 11.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

The read

Daisy, Missouri (ZIP 63743), by its composite score, sits in the top 37% healthiest ZIPs nationally (11,840th) and the top 11.4% of Missouri (113th).

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides for this area, fairly evenly: modeled pfas resides in the bottom 1.2% nationally, and housing-cost burden is at the national minimum. Modeled transportation noise lands at the national minimum, and poverty stands at the national minimum. Homeownership registers at the national maximum, and home broadband subscription settles at the national maximum. Unemployment sits at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Households without a vehicle lies at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Modeled disaster risk rests in the bottom 9.1% nationally. Pulling the other way, lead in tap water resides in the top 8.9% nationally.

For anyone unfamiliar, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 63747, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Cape Girardeau, MO-IL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 83%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 83%

14%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 59%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 60%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 57%

11%

Disability

healthier than 52%

7%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 38%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 29%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 10%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 81%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 88%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 86%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 82%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 89%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 69%

8%

Disability

healthier than 83%

7%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 29%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 2%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 83%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 96%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 91%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 91%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the top 0.00%

11%

Disability

healthier than 83%

7%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 57%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 57%

5%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 4%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.7%27.1–34.2
High blood pressure among adults36.1%31.9–40.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.1%9.0–11.2
Current asthma among adults10.9%9.5–12.4
Coronary heart disease among adults6.7%5.8–7.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.7%6.1–9.4
Depression among adults24.7%20.9–28.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.0%9.3–12.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.9%33.7–42.0
Obesity among adults32.8%26.4–39.2
Stroke among adults3.5%3.0–4.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.1%7.3–11.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.3%4.3–8.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.7%76.6–82.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.3%77.0–83.3
Cholesterol screening among adults86.8%84.2–89.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years59.0%53.8–63.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults65.3%61.7–68.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.2%70.0–83.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.0%13.3–19.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.0%10.5–17.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.8%21.6–32.4
Short sleep duration among adults34.9%29.2–41.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.2%14.7–22.1
Frequent mental distress among adults17.0%14.5–19.6
Frequent physical distress among adults14.1%11.7–16.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.8%13.1–18.7
Any disability among adults34.7%29.4–40.0
Hearing disability among adults8.7%7.5–10.0
Independent living disability among adults8.3%6.8–10.0
Mobility disability among adults15.5%12.7–18.6
Self-care disability among adults3.4%2.7–4.1
Vision disability among adults4.3%3.5–5.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults17.7%14.4–21.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.3%6.7–12.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.8%4.7–9.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.7%6.5–11.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.2%4.9–7.7
Loneliness among adults30.7%25.7–36.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.2%4.8–7.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate0.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.3% (3.2–26.0%) n=1,009
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.2% (3.5–28.4%) n=1,006
No HS diploma (25+)0.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.5% (2.5–20.5%) n=1,009
Bachelor's or higher (25+)6.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.1% (7.2–40.2%) n=1,009
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.5%) n=1,003
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–11.9%) n=1,009
Broadband subscription100.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.3% (72.7–95.2%) n=1,009
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)0.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.7% (8.4–33.9%) n=1,009
Homeownership rate100.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.4% (56.0–94.3%) n=1,009
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–5.1%) n=1,009
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.4%) n=1,010
Single-parent households41.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (39.5–75.6%) n=1,005
Population 65+10.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.2% (11.7–31.1%) n=1,010
Median age44.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.3–55.9) n=1,005
Median household income$122,750$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,740 ($42,457–$95,231) n=948
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$174,150 ($91,880–$309,500) n=930
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$813 ($553–$1,265) n=786
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.8 yr ± 1.9378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.6–81.0) n=995

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.93 years of 79.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured