Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

53561

in Merrimac, WisconsinPopulation 1,872

53.36/ 100

Ranked #11,557 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 36%)

Ranked #402 of 763 Wisconsin ZIPs (bottom 47%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Nitrate in drinking water

0.22%

in the top 7.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

0.99 per 1,000 residents

in the top 9.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

16.8 mi

in the top 10.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US89th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, Merrimac, Wisconsin (ZIP 53561) lands in the top 36% healthiest ZIPs nationally (11,557th) and the bottom 47% of Wisconsin (402nd).

continue reading

Reading the numbers as a whole, this area's strong points come through first: recreation is in the top 9.0% nationally, and modeled loneliness sits in the bottom 10.9% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise lands at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Park land lies in the top 14.3% nationally, and modeled utility shutoff stands in the bottom 14.9% nationally. Modeled colon screening rests in the top 13.2% nationally, and fiber broadband registers in the top 16% nationally. Outer-floodplain exposure resides at the national minimum, shared with about 36% of ZIPs. Set against that, modeled nitrate settles in the top 7.8% nationally, and distance to a community health center is in the top 10.6% nationally.

Against the wider neighborhood, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put simply, nitrate is a groundwater compound from fertilizer, manure, and sewage, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Distance to a community health center is a federally funded (HRSA) community health center serving everyone regardless of ability to pay. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. On the overall standing, ZIP 53555, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 78%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 86%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 81%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 60%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 62%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 40%

11%

Disability

healthier than 56%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 39%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 11%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 75%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 91%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 66%

13%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 51%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 48%

8%

Disability

healthier than 42%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 28%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 30%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 8%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.6%28.5–34.6
High blood pressure among adults37.2%33.5–40.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.4%9.5–11.3
Current asthma among adults10.9%9.8–12.1
Coronary heart disease among adults8.1%7.2–9.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.0%6.9–9.3
Depression among adults23.9%20.9–27.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.7%11.9–15.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.9%34.3–41.4
Obesity among adults40.4%34.3–46.3
Stroke among adults4.0%3.6–4.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.3%10.1–14.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.0%5.6–8.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.2%78.7–83.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.9%76.0–81.6
Cholesterol screening among adults88.3%86.8–89.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.4%67.4–75.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults67.5%64.5–70.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.5%69.9–82.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.8%15.2–20.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.8%13.2–18.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.9%25.6–34.2
Short sleep duration among adults32.4%27.5–37.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.4%16.7–22.3
Frequent mental distress among adults15.1%13.4–16.9
Frequent physical distress among adults14.7%12.9–16.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.6%10.9–14.3
Any disability among adults32.4%28.4–36.5
Hearing disability among adults8.3%7.4–9.2
Independent living disability among adults8.1%7.1–9.2
Mobility disability among adults15.9%13.7–18.2
Self-care disability among adults4.0%3.5–4.5
Vision disability among adults4.6%4.1–5.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults18.4%15.6–21.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.9%9.0–13.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults12.0%9.9–14.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.5%7.2–10.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.0%5.2–6.8
Loneliness among adults28.6%24.6–32.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.1%4.3–5.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (3.6–16.0%) n=765
Uninsured 18–6412.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.7% (2.4–14.9%) n=764
No HS diploma (25+)5.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.9% (2.3–12.6%) n=768
Bachelor's or higher (25+)38.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.5% (12.7–44.0%) n=768
Unemployment rate (16+)3.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.6% (0.9–5.6%) n=763
Households without a vehicle1.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.8–9.0%) n=764
Broadband subscription91.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (80.0–94.8%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)24.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.8% (14.7–29.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate89.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.3% (62.1–91.8%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.7%) n=764
Foreign-born population0.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.3–6.8%) n=768
Single-parent households63.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08759.0% (47.7–72.8%) n=762
Population 65+26.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (13.9–32.2%) n=768
Median age47.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29244.2 yr (36.2–56.1) n=765
Median household income$91,103$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,147 ($57,542–$101,625) n=755
Median home value$427,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$231,900 ($160,140–$367,300) n=755
Median gross rent$1,061$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$914 ($696–$1,261) n=706
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.8 yr ± 1.4178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.4 yr (77.7–83.6) n=712

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.41 years of 82.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured