ZIP code
63967
in Williamsville, MissouriPopulation 1,313
42.14/ 100
Ranked #25,095 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 22%)
Ranked #586 of 993 Missouri ZIPs (bottom 41%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Fatal road crashes
53.3 per 100,000 residents per year
in the top 3.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST97thUS97thDefinition & source ›
The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.
A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.
Full methodology ›Park land
39.1%
in the top 3.4% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST98thUS97thDefinition & source ›
The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.
Full methodology ›Tree cover
76%
in the top 6.6% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST95thUS93rdDefinition & source ›
The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.
Full methodology ›Home broadband subscription
73.7%
in the bottom 8.7% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST11thUS9thDefinition & source ›
The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.
Full methodology ›PFAS in drinking water
9.9%
in the bottom 8.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST18thUS9thDefinition & source ›
The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.
A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.
Full methodology ›Median household income
$42,048
in the bottom 6.9% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST9thUS7thDefinition & source ›
The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.
Full methodology ›Humid extreme heat
94.3 days/year
in the top 26% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST90thUS74thDefinition & source ›
The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.
Full methodology ›The read
Williamsville, Missouri (ZIP 63967), in overall standing, comes out in the bottom 22% nationally (25,095th) and the bottom 41% of Missouri (586th).
An even profile, with readings pulling both ways: park land lies in the top 3.4% nationally, modeled tree cover registers in the top 6.6% nationally, and modeled pfas is in the bottom 8.8% nationally. Housing-cost burden lies in the bottom 12.2% nationally. Against that, fatal road crashes registers in the top 3.2% nationally, and home broadband subscription is in the bottom 8.7% nationally. Household income lies in the bottom 6.9% nationally, and modeled hearing disability registers in the top 14.4% nationally. Modeled short sleep is in the top 15% nationally. Recreation lies at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs.
Set within its surrounding area, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, for reference, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 63937, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 86%
14%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 61%
5%
About typical
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 48%
16%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 17%
21%
Preventive Care
healthier than 33%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 12%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 27%
8%
Disability
healthier than 20%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 24%
5%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 89%
14%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 67%
5%
About typical
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 53%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 43%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 43%
8%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 23%
21%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 27%
11%
Disability
healthier than 36%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 17%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Findings that name this ZIP
One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.
Clean environment, heavy chronic burden
Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions
Environmental-hazard standing 86.6; chronic-disease standing 17.3 — 69 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.
Ranked #1,111 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
63901
Missourishares a border
Score 33.90
Closest healthier
63937
Missourishares a border
Score 44.08
Similar health profile
63869
Missouri99% similar profile
Score 40.21
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 35.2% | 32.3–38.1 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 42.2% | 38.8–45.6 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 10.3% | 9.6–11.1 |
| Current asthma among adults | 11.0% | 10.0–12.1 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 8.9% | 8.1–9.8 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 11.0% | 9.7–12.4 |
| Depression among adults | 25.5% | 22.7–28.5 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 14.7% | 13.1–16.3 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 41.9% | 38.4–45.3 |
| Obesity among adults | 39.1% | 33.3–45.0 |
| Stroke among adults | 4.5% | 4.1–4.9 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 20.4% | 17.6–23.7 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 8.8% | 7.3–10.4 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 79.9% | 77.6–81.9 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 79.3% | 76.7–81.7 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 85.4% | 83.6–87.0 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 62.1% | 58.2–66.0 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 53.2% | 50.0–56.3 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 72.7% | 66.5–78.4 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 14.9% | 12.9–17.1 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 19.8% | 17.2–22.5 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 32.7% | 28.7–36.9 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 40.4% | 35.3–45.9 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 24.4% | 21.6–27.3 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 17.9% | 16.1–19.6 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 17.3% | 15.6–19.1 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 18.4% | 16.5–20.4 |
| Any disability among adults | 40.0% | 36.0–43.8 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 10.4% | 9.4–11.5 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 10.5% | 9.3–11.7 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 19.7% | 17.4–21.9 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 5.0% | 4.4–5.5 |
| Vision disability among adults | 5.9% | 5.3–6.6 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 19.7% | 17.3–22.4 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 14.2% | 12.1–16.4 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 11.7% | 9.9–13.6 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 11.4% | 9.9–13.0 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 8.3% | 7.4–9.4 |
| Loneliness among adults | 29.8% | 26.3–33.7 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 8.7% | 7.6–9.8 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | MO median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 14.6% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 12.3% (3.2–26.0%) n=1,009 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 13.1% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 13.2% (3.5–28.4%) n=1,006 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 22.2% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 9.5% (2.5–20.5%) n=1,009 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 14.3% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 18.1% (7.2–40.2%) n=1,009 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 2.2% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 2.9% (0.0–8.5%) n=1,003 |
| Households without a vehicle | 7.9% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.1% (0.0–11.9%) n=1,009 |
| Broadband subscription | 73.7% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 86.3% (72.7–95.2%) n=1,009 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 11.9% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 20.7% (8.4–33.9%) n=1,009 |
| Homeownership rate | 85.4% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 79.4% (56.0–94.3%) n=1,009 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 2.3% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 1.1% (0.0–5.1%) n=1,009 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 0.8% (0.0–6.4%) n=1,010 |
| Single-parent households | 55.3% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 55.0% (39.5–75.6%) n=1,005 |
| Population 65+ | 28.8% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 19.2% (11.7–31.1%) n=1,010 |
| Median age | 49.6 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 41.5 yr (33.3–55.9) n=1,005 |
| Median household income | $42,048 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $61,740 ($42,457–$95,231) n=948 |
| Median home value | $104,400 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $174,150 ($91,880–$309,500) n=930 |
| Median gross rent | $710 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $813 ($553–$1,265) n=786 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | MO median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 71.7 yr ± 0.68 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 77.6 yr (74.6–81.0) n=995 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.68 years of 71.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured