ZIP code
65456
in Davisville, MissouriPopulation 637
42.97/ 100
Ranked #24,402 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 24%)
Ranked #542 of 993 Missouri ZIPs (bottom 45%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Park land
38.6%
in the top 3.5% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST98thUS97thDefinition & source ›
The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.
Full methodology ›Arsenic in groundwater
1.1%
in the bottom 4.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST10thUS5thDefinition & source ›
The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.
A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.
Full methodology ›Distance to an emergency room
21.1 mi
in the top 4.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST93rdUS95thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.
Full methodology ›Tree cover
75.7%
in the top 6.7% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST95thUS93rdDefinition & source ›
The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.
Full methodology ›Crowded housing
8.0%
in the top 6.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST96thUS93rdDefinition & source ›
The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.
Full methodology ›Hearing disability
11.1%
in the top 8.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST76thUS91stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.
Full methodology ›Walkability
2.9 intersections/sq mi
in the bottom 14.9% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST7thUS15thDefinition & source ›
The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.
Full methodology ›Median household income
$98,700
in the top 20% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST92ndUS80thDefinition & source ›
The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.
Full methodology ›Dry extreme heat
11.7 days/year
in the top 32% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST6thUS68thDefinition & source ›
The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.
Full methodology ›The read
Davisville, Missouri (ZIP 65456), by its composite score, sits in the bottom 24% nationally (24,402nd) and the bottom 45% of Missouri (542nd).
The data opens on a genuinely even set of readings: park land settles in the top 3.5% nationally, and modeled arsenic sits in the bottom 4.6% nationally. Modeled tree cover lies in the top 6.7% nationally. Unemployment rests at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Housing-cost burden resides in the bottom 11.2% nationally, and modeled pfas is in the bottom 13.4% nationally. On the other side, distance to an emergency room lands in the top 4.8% nationally, crowded housing stands in the top 6.7% nationally, and modeled hearing disability registers in the top 8.7% nationally. Poverty settles in the top 10.8% nationally.
Next to the surrounding area, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For anyone unfamiliar, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 65446, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 78%
14%
About typical
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 41%
16%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 47%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 55%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 15%
21%
Preventive Care
healthier than 37%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 16%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 36%
8%
Disability
healthier than 21%
7%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 78%
14%
Mental Health
healthier than 66%
8%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 83%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 61%
5%
About typical
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 45%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 49%
13%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 19%
21%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 38%
11%
Disability
healthier than 37%
7%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
65439
Missourishares a border
Score 36.60
Closest healthier
65446
Missourishares a border
Score 43.36
Similar health profile
64649
Missouri99% similar profile
Score 43.51
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 35.1% | 31.1–39.2 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 41.5% | 36.7–46.3 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 10.8% | 9.6–12.1 |
| Current asthma among adults | 10.8% | 9.4–12.3 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 9.4% | 8.1–10.9 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 11.0% | 9.0–13.2 |
| Depression among adults | 24.7% | 20.9–28.8 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 15.0% | 12.7–17.6 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 42.3% | 37.2–47.2 |
| Obesity among adults | 41.5% | 33.0–50.5 |
| Stroke among adults | 4.6% | 4.0–5.4 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 21.4% | 17.9–25.5 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 8.7% | 6.6–11.4 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 81.2% | 77.9–84.1 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 80.3% | 76.6–83.8 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 86.3% | 83.9–88.5 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 60.8% | 55.7–65.8 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 54.0% | 50.4–57.8 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 72.1% | 64.3–79.2 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 14.7% | 11.9–18.1 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 19.2% | 15.3–22.9 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 32.7% | 26.7–38.6 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 39.4% | 33.0–46.2 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 24.0% | 19.8–28.4 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 17.2% | 15.0–19.7 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 17.0% | 14.5–19.7 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 17.8% | 15.1–20.8 |
| Any disability among adults | 41.3% | 35.7–47.1 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 11.1% | 9.6–12.7 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 10.1% | 8.5–12.0 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 19.9% | 16.5–23.5 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 4.8% | 4.0–5.7 |
| Vision disability among adults | 5.8% | 4.9–6.9 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 19.8% | 16.4–23.4 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 13.3% | 10.4–16.6 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 10.7% | 8.3–13.5 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 10.9% | 8.8–13.1 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 7.8% | 6.5–9.2 |
| Loneliness among adults | 30.7% | 25.8–36.0 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 8.0% | 6.7–9.3 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | MO median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 25.1% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 12.3% (3.2–26.0%) n=1,009 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 10.1% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 13.2% (3.5–28.4%) n=1,006 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 20.5% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 9.5% (2.5–20.5%) n=1,009 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 9.1% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 18.1% (7.2–40.2%) n=1,009 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 2.9% (0.0–8.5%) n=1,003 |
| Households without a vehicle | 4.2% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.1% (0.0–11.9%) n=1,009 |
| Broadband subscription | 83.5% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 86.3% (72.7–95.2%) n=1,009 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 11.3% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 20.7% (8.4–33.9%) n=1,009 |
| Homeownership rate | 91.5% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 79.4% (56.0–94.3%) n=1,009 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 8.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 1.1% (0.0–5.1%) n=1,009 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 0.8% (0.0–6.4%) n=1,010 |
| Single-parent households | 57.7% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 55.0% (39.5–75.6%) n=1,005 |
| Population 65+ | 19.8% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 19.2% (11.7–31.1%) n=1,010 |
| Median age | 34.6 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 41.5 yr (33.3–55.9) n=1,005 |
| Median household income | $98,700 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $61,740 ($42,457–$95,231) n=948 |
| Median home value | $223,400 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $174,150 ($91,880–$309,500) n=930 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $813 ($553–$1,265) n=786 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | MO median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 77.8 yr ± 1.41 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 77.6 yr (74.6–81.0) n=995 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.41 years of 77.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured