ZIP code
63061
in Luebbering, MissouriPopulation 216
43.86/ 100
Ranked #23,553 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 27%)
Ranked #491 of 993 Missouri ZIPs (top 49%)
Ranked #194 of 234 St. Louis, MO-IL ZIPs (bottom 17%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Distance to an emergency room
18.2 mi
in the top 7.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST89thUS93rdDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.
Full methodology ›Transportation noise
0.07%
in the bottom 7.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST12thUS8thDefinition & source ›
The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.
Full methodology ›Tooth loss
24%
in the top 8.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST86thUS91stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.
Full methodology ›Housing-cost burden
9.4%
in the bottom 8.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST12thUS9thDefinition & source ›
The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.
Full methodology ›Poverty rate
2.8%
in the bottom 9.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST9thUS9thDefinition & source ›
The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.
Full methodology ›Loneliness
28.7%
in the bottom 11.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST8thUS12thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.
Full methodology ›Expected annual disaster loss
$0
in the bottom 12.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST6thUS12thDefinition & source ›
FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.
Full methodology ›Floodplain exposure
1.0%
in the bottom 12.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST5thUS12thDefinition & source ›
The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.
Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.
Full methodology ›Obesity
42.7%
in the top 10.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST91stUS90thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.
Full methodology ›Distance to a nursing home
9 mi
in the top 13.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST94thUS87thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.
Full methodology ›The read
In overall standing, Luebbering, Missouri (ZIP 63061) comes out in the bottom 27% nationally (23,553rd) and the top 49% of Missouri (491st).
The measures fall on both sides of the ledger for this area: unemployment stands at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Modeled transportation noise lands in the bottom 7.7% nationally, housing-cost burden is in the bottom 8.7% nationally, and poverty resides in the bottom 9.0% nationally. Modeled disaster risk rests in the bottom 10.6% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise lies at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Modeled loneliness sits in the bottom 11.6% nationally. Set against that, distance to an emergency room settles in the top 7.0% nationally, and modeled tooth loss registers in the top 8.8% nationally. Fiber broadband stands at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs.
In plain terms, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 63041, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the St. Louis, MO-IL metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 62%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 82%
14%
About typical
Preventive Care
healthier than 43%
13%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 54%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 17%
21%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 16%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 26%
8%
Disability
healthier than 23%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 20%
5%
Lifting this score
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 70%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 84%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 61%
13%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 97%
5%
About typical
Mental Health
healthier than 41%
8%
Disability
healthier than 42%
7%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 23%
21%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 37%
11%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 14%
5%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
in the top 0.7%
14%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 87%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 8%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 36%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 38%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 21%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 25%
8%
Disability
healthier than 16%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 9%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
63041
Missourishares a border
Score 46.73
Closest healthier
63060
Missourishares a border
Score 44.28
Similar health profile
65446
Missouri98% similar profile
Score 43.36
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 34.6% | 30.7–38.6 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 41.8% | 37.4–46.2 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 9.8% | 8.8–11.0 |
| Current asthma among adults | 10.7% | 9.4–12.2 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 8.8% | 7.6–10.2 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 10.5% | 8.5–12.7 |
| Depression among adults | 25.9% | 22.3–30.0 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 14.4% | 12.2–16.8 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 42.0% | 37.6–46.8 |
| Obesity among adults | 42.7% | 35.8–50.2 |
| Stroke among adults | 4.3% | 3.7–5.0 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 24.0% | 19.7–28.8 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 8.5% | 6.4–11.2 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 80.2% | 77.2–83.2 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 79.8% | 76.3–83.0 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 86.6% | 84.4–88.8 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 64.1% | 58.7–69.2 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 57.0% | 53.0–60.8 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 71.8% | 63.5–79.3 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 15.9% | 13.1–19.1 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 20.7% | 16.4–25.2 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 33.7% | 27.7–40.1 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 35.4% | 29.3–42.0 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 24.0% | 19.8–28.7 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 17.7% | 15.4–20.2 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 17.0% | 14.5–19.8 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 18.2% | 15.3–21.3 |
| Any disability among adults | 39.7% | 34.0–45.6 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 10.4% | 8.9–11.9 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 10.1% | 8.5–12.1 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 18.8% | 15.4–22.5 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 4.7% | 3.8–5.7 |
| Vision disability among adults | 5.6% | 4.7–6.7 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 19.6% | 16.4–23.5 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 13.8% | 10.6–17.5 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 11.3% | 8.4–14.7 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 11.6% | 9.2–14.2 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 8.0% | 6.6–9.6 |
| Loneliness among adults | 28.7% | 24.1–33.8 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 8.5% | 6.9–10.1 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | MO median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 2.8% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 12.3% (3.2–26.0%) n=1,009 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 35.2% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 13.2% (3.5–28.4%) n=1,006 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 17.4% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 9.5% (2.5–20.5%) n=1,009 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 7.4% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 18.1% (7.2–40.2%) n=1,009 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 2.9% (0.0–8.5%) n=1,003 |
| Households without a vehicle | 9.4% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.1% (0.0–11.9%) n=1,009 |
| Broadband subscription | 90.6% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 86.3% (72.7–95.2%) n=1,009 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 9.4% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 20.7% (8.4–33.9%) n=1,009 |
| Homeownership rate | 67.2% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 79.4% (56.0–94.3%) n=1,009 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 1.1% (0.0–5.1%) n=1,009 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 0.8% (0.0–6.4%) n=1,010 |
| Single-parent households | 17.2% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 55.0% (39.5–75.6%) n=1,005 |
| Population 65+ | 15.3% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 19.2% (11.7–31.1%) n=1,010 |
| Median age | 28.3 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 41.5 yr (33.3–55.9) n=1,005 |
| Median household income | $99,405 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $61,740 ($42,457–$95,231) n=948 |
| Median home value | $255,000 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $174,150 ($91,880–$309,500) n=930 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $813 ($553–$1,265) n=786 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | MO median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 80.5 yr ± 2.84 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 77.6 yr (74.6–81.0) n=995 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.84 years of 80.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured