Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

63349

in Hawk Point, MissouriPopulation 2,149

43.87/ 100

Ranked #23,548 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 27%)

Ranked #490 of 993 Missouri ZIPs (top 49%)

Ranked #193 of 234 St. Louis, MO-IL ZIPs (bottom 18%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Crowded housing

8.3%

in the top 6.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

9.0%

in the bottom 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST15th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

20.1%

in the top 9.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST73rd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

The read

Judged by its overall standing, Hawk Point, Missouri (ZIP 63349) sits in the bottom 27% nationally (23,548th) and the top 49% of Missouri (490th).

continue reading

A few readings each way define this mixed profile: modeled pfas is in the bottom 6.8% nationally, civic lies in the top 12.3% nationally, and modeled disaster risk registers in the bottom 16% nationally. Outer-floodplain exposure is at the national minimum, shared with about 36% of ZIPs. Pulling the other way, crowded housing lies in the top 6.4% nationally, and modeled cognitive disability registers in the top 9.0% nationally. Modeled short sleep is in the top 14.9% nationally, and obesity lies in the top 13.9% nationally. Recreation registers at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs. Physicians is at the national minimum, shared with about 38% of ZIPs.

Put plainly, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Outer-floodplain exposure is land with a lower but real 1-in-500 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "500-year floodplain". A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 63377, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the St. Louis, MO-IL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 70%

14%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 46%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 47%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 22%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 5%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 17%

8%

Disability

healthier than 28%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 31%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 68%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 66%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 63%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 52%

16%

Disability

healthier than 54%

7%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 20%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 9%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 20%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 31%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 95%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 61%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 36%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 23%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 8%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 9%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 8%

8%

Disability

healthier than 21%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 21%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.7%25.4–32.2
High blood pressure among adults36.0%31.9–40.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.9%7.1–8.7
Current asthma among adults11.1%9.8–12.5
Coronary heart disease among adults6.8%6.1–7.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.2%8.1–10.4
Depression among adults25.4%21.7–29.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.2%10.6–14.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.1%32.8–41.4
Obesity among adults41.8%33.8–49.4
Stroke among adults3.7%3.3–4.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years17.9%14.8–21.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.2%8.5–12.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.1%71.7–78.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.6%72.5–80.0
Cholesterol screening among adults82.0%79.6–84.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years61.2%56.0–66.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults55.8%52.0–59.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.7%68.4–82.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.2%14.1–20.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults21.0%18.1–24.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults32.8%27.8–37.9
Short sleep duration among adults40.5%34.3–47.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults23.0%19.9–26.3
Frequent mental distress among adults19.6%17.4–22.0
Frequent physical distress among adults16.1%14.1–18.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults20.1%17.8–22.5
Any disability among adults39.8%35.1–44.9
Hearing disability among adults8.5%7.5–9.6
Independent living disability among adults10.2%9.0–11.5
Mobility disability among adults17.0%14.7–19.4
Self-care disability among adults4.2%3.8–4.7
Vision disability among adults5.5%4.9–6.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.2%18.1–24.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.3%12.9–18.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults12.4%10.5–14.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.4%11.5–15.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.0%7.9–10.2
Loneliness among adults32.5%28.0–37.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.5%8.3–10.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate12.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.3% (3.2–26.0%) n=1,009
Uninsured 18–6418.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.2% (3.5–28.4%) n=1,006
No HS diploma (25+)8.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.5% (2.5–20.5%) n=1,009
Bachelor's or higher (25+)9.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.1% (7.2–40.2%) n=1,009
Unemployment rate (16+)4.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.5%) n=1,003
Households without a vehicle4.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–11.9%) n=1,009
Broadband subscription86.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.3% (72.7–95.2%) n=1,009
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)18.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.7% (8.4–33.9%) n=1,009
Homeownership rate78.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.4% (56.0–94.3%) n=1,009
Crowded housing (>1 per room)8.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–5.1%) n=1,009
Foreign-born population0.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.4%) n=1,010
Single-parent households59.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (39.5–75.6%) n=1,005
Population 65+16.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.2% (11.7–31.1%) n=1,010
Median age42.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.3–55.9) n=1,005
Median household income$80,375$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,740 ($42,457–$95,231) n=948
Median home value$250,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$174,150 ($91,880–$309,500) n=930
Median gross rent$909$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$813 ($553–$1,265) n=786
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.8 yr ± 1.8378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.6–81.0) n=995

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.83 years of 79.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured