Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

62356

in New Canton, IllinoisPopulation 518

46.07/ 100

Ranked #21,264 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 34%)

Ranked #1,074 of 1,368 Illinois ZIPs (bottom 21%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Crowded housing

16.1%

in the top 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

0.75%

in the top 14.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US86th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

4.8%

in the top 11.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

20.7 days/year

in the top 22% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US78th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

18.2%

in the top 24% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US76th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, New Canton, Illinois (ZIP 62356) places in the bottom 34% nationally (21,264th) and the bottom 21% of Illinois (1,074th).

continue reading

The data opens on a genuinely even set of readings: modeled loud transportation noise lies at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Outer-floodplain exposure rests at the national minimum, shared with about 36% of ZIPs. On the other side, crowded housing resides in the top 1.9% nationally. Fiber broadband is at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled mammography lands in the bottom 11.3% nationally, slow internet speeds stands in the top 14.4% nationally, and modeled energy burden registers in the top 11.3% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility settles at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Home broadband subscription sits in the bottom 17% nationally. Recreation lies at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs.

For readers new to these terms, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. Energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 62363, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 47%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 43%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 41%

8%

Disability

healthier than 45%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 36%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 11%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 38%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 33%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 29%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 64%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 24%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 7%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 34%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 39%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 17%

8%

Disability

healthier than 28%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 16%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 38%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.4%26.9–34.1
High blood pressure among adults38.2%33.8–42.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.8%8.8–10.9
Current asthma among adults10.5%9.2–11.9
Coronary heart disease among adults8.1%7.1–9.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.2%7.8–10.6
Depression among adults23.3%19.6–27.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.8%10.9–14.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.8%34.2–43.4
Obesity among adults39.4%31.0–48.5
Stroke among adults4.0%3.6–4.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years18.2%14.5–22.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.6%6.0–9.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.2%75.2–80.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.4%74.6–81.9
Cholesterol screening among adults86.0%83.7–88.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.7%61.1–72.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults58.5%54.0–62.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years69.3%59.8–77.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.5%14.4–21.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.9%13.1–18.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.4%20.7–30.4
Short sleep duration among adults35.2%28.1–42.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.5%17.4–23.9
Frequent mental distress among adults17.7%15.4–20.0
Frequent physical distress among adults14.7%12.8–16.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.5%12.5–16.8
Any disability among adults32.8%28.1–37.6
Hearing disability among adults8.6%7.6–9.8
Independent living disability among adults9.1%7.8–10.4
Mobility disability among adults15.8%13.5–18.2
Self-care disability among adults4.1%3.6–4.7
Vision disability among adults5.1%4.5–5.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.7%20.0–28.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.8%11.0–17.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults14.1%11.1–17.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.6%8.6–12.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.5%6.3–8.9
Loneliness among adults33.0%27.6–38.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.0%5.9–8.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.4% (3.4–21.4%) n=1,378
Uninsured 18–6413.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.6% (1.7–15.2%) n=1,375
No HS diploma (25+)3.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.5% (2.1–16.1%) n=1,377
Bachelor's or higher (25+)15.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.6% (9.3–49.2%) n=1,377
Unemployment rate (16+)1.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.7–10.0%) n=1,375
Households without a vehicle2.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–11.8%) n=1,377
Broadband subscription79.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.4% (77.4–96.0%) n=1,377
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)25.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.2% (10.7–34.7%) n=1,377
Homeownership rate78.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.9% (61.0–94.1%) n=1,377
Crowded housing (>1 per room)16.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–4.1%) n=1,377
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.4% (0.0–17.6%) n=1,378
Single-parent households42.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.8% (39.6–70.3%) n=1,372
Population 65+16.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–28.7%) n=1,378
Median age30.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.1 yr (34.3–52.1) n=1,373
Median household income$68,542$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,429 ($50,714–$114,949) n=1,334
Median home value$86,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$154,250 ($86,310–$346,100) n=1,332
Median gross rent$688$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$934 ($675–$1,653) n=1,170
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.8 yr ± 0.9378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (75.5–82.2) n=1,348

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.93 years of 77.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured