Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

62887

in Springerton, IllinoisPopulation 104

45.89/ 100

Ranked #21,458 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 33%)

Ranked #1,088 of 1,368 Illinois ZIPs (bottom 20%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Home broadband subscription

54.9%

in the bottom 2.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

67.4%

in the bottom 6.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST4th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$29,135

in the bottom 1.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.10%

in the bottom 8.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

39.2%

in the top 11.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

4.7%

in the top 12.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US87th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

41.2 mi

in the top 18% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US82nd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Springerton, Illinois (ZIP 62887) places in the bottom 33% nationally (21,458th) and the bottom 20% of Illinois (1,088th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The measures land in both directions, and neither dominates: modeled transportation noise registers in the bottom 8.4% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise settles at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Modeled pfas sits in the bottom 13.7% nationally. Pulling the other way, home broadband subscription lies in the bottom 2.1% nationally, modeled mammography rests in the bottom 6.3% nationally, and household income resides in the bottom 1.7% nationally. Housing-cost burden is in the top 11.0% nationally, and modeled arsenic lands in the top 12.3% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility stands at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Modeled energy burden registers in the top 12.7% nationally.

For readers new to these terms, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 62828, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 76%

14%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 42%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 41%

11%

Disability

healthier than 41%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 12%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 31%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 27%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 34%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 23%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 94%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 31%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 8%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 24%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 35%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 4%

8%

Disability

healthier than 22%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 17%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 30%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.1%27.3–33.2
High blood pressure among adults37.1%33.7–40.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.7%8.9–10.5
Current asthma among adults11.2%10.1–12.4
Coronary heart disease among adults7.8%7.0–8.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.2%8.0–10.5
Depression among adults24.4%21.4–27.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.5%11.0–14.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.7%34.1–41.3
Obesity among adults37.7%31.1–44.6
Stroke among adults4.0%3.6–4.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.6%11.3–16.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.7%6.2–9.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.9%75.5–80.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.3%75.1–81.2
Cholesterol screening among adults85.9%83.9–87.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.9%58.3–67.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults62.1%58.7–65.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years67.4%62.5–72.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.5%14.9–20.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.0%13.7–18.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.3%21.6–29.4
Short sleep duration among adults35.7%30.2–41.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.9%18.3–23.7
Frequent mental distress among adults18.6%16.8–20.6
Frequent physical distress among adults15.0%13.4–16.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.4%13.6–17.3
Any disability among adults33.4%29.7–37.5
Hearing disability among adults8.5%7.6–9.5
Independent living disability among adults9.6%8.5–10.8
Mobility disability among adults15.9%14.0–18.1
Self-care disability among adults4.2%3.7–4.7
Vision disability among adults5.3%4.7–5.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.2%21.1–27.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.5%12.3–17.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults14.5%12.1–17.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.2%9.6–13.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.0%7.0–9.0
Loneliness among adults33.8%29.6–38.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.4%6.4–8.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.4% (3.4–21.4%) n=1,378
Uninsured 18–648.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.6% (1.7–15.2%) n=1,375
No HS diploma (25+)7.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.5% (2.1–16.1%) n=1,377
Bachelor's or higher (25+)13.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.6% (9.3–49.2%) n=1,377
Unemployment rate (16+)2.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.7–10.0%) n=1,375
Households without a vehicle2.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–11.8%) n=1,377
Broadband subscription54.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.4% (77.4–96.0%) n=1,377
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)39.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.2% (10.7–34.7%) n=1,377
Homeownership rate84.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.9% (61.0–94.1%) n=1,377
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–4.1%) n=1,377
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.4% (0.0–17.6%) n=1,378
Single-parent households40.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.8% (39.6–70.3%) n=1,372
Population 65+20.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–28.7%) n=1,378
Median age42.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.1 yr (34.3–52.1) n=1,373
Median household income$29,135$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,429 ($50,714–$114,949) n=1,334
Median home value$63,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$154,250 ($86,310–$346,100) n=1,332
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$934 ($675–$1,653) n=1,170
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.4 yr ± 1.7578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (75.5–82.2) n=1,348

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.75 years of 80.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured