Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

62824

in Clay City, IllinoisPopulation 1,485

46.23/ 100

Ranked #21,063 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 34%)

Ranked #1,064 of 1,368 Illinois ZIPs (bottom 22%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Pharmacy access

0.6 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

40.4 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 6.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US7th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

24.8%

in the top 11.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

85%

in the top 20% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US80th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, Clay City, Illinois (ZIP 62824) ranks in the bottom 34% nationally (21,063rd) and the bottom 22% of Illinois (1,064th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

Strengths and concerns sit side by side across the measures here: pharmacy lands in the top 3.3% nationally, and modeled industrial-pollution burden registers in the bottom 7.5% nationally. Fiber broadband sits in the top 20% nationally. On the other hand, fatal road crashes rests in the top 6.7% nationally, poverty is in the top 11.1% nationally, and modeled arsenic stands in the top 13.4% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility settles at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Recreation lies at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs. Unemployment resides in the top 18% nationally. Physicians lands at the national minimum, shared with about 38% of ZIPs.

In plainer terms, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 62434, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 56%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 43%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 41%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 54%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 30%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 19%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 39%

11%

Disability

healthier than 39%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 34%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 77%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 62%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 43%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 16%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 15%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 33%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 17%

8%

Disability

healthier than 19%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 17%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.7%28.0–35.7
High blood pressure among adults39.6%35.0–44.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.3%9.3–11.4
Current asthma among adults10.7%9.4–12.2
Coronary heart disease among adults8.5%7.5–9.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.9%8.6–11.2
Depression among adults23.3%19.7–27.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.5%11.6–15.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.7%35.0–44.6
Obesity among adults40.4%31.4–49.9
Stroke among adults4.3%3.9–4.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.8%11.0–16.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.1%6.7–9.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.0%76.0–81.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.7%74.9–82.2
Cholesterol screening among adults86.4%84.5–88.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.2%58.2–69.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults61.1%56.9–65.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.8%66.9–76.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.3%14.2–20.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.7%14.1–19.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.4%21.5–31.4
Short sleep duration among adults34.9%27.8–42.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.6%18.5–24.8
Frequent mental distress among adults17.7%15.6–20.0
Frequent physical distress among adults15.4%13.4–17.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.9%12.9–16.9
Any disability among adults34.0%29.2–38.8
Hearing disability among adults9.0%7.9–10.2
Independent living disability among adults9.5%8.3–10.7
Mobility disability among adults16.7%14.3–19.2
Self-care disability among adults4.3%3.9–4.8
Vision disability among adults5.4%4.8–6.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.2%20.7–28.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.6%12.2–17.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults14.8%12.4–17.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.9%9.2–12.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.7%6.6–8.8
Loneliness among adults33.4%28.4–38.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.2%6.1–8.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate24.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.4% (3.4–21.4%) n=1,378
Uninsured 18–6411.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.6% (1.7–15.2%) n=1,375
No HS diploma (25+)8.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.5% (2.1–16.1%) n=1,377
Bachelor's or higher (25+)12.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.6% (9.3–49.2%) n=1,377
Unemployment rate (16+)7.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.7–10.0%) n=1,375
Households without a vehicle3.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–11.8%) n=1,377
Broadband subscription81.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.4% (77.4–96.0%) n=1,377
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)22.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.2% (10.7–34.7%) n=1,377
Homeownership rate85.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.9% (61.0–94.1%) n=1,377
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–4.1%) n=1,377
Foreign-born population0.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.4% (0.0–17.6%) n=1,378
Single-parent households59.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.8% (39.6–70.3%) n=1,372
Population 65+23.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–28.7%) n=1,378
Median age42.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.1 yr (34.3–52.1) n=1,373
Median household income$61,591$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,429 ($50,714–$114,949) n=1,334
Median home value$102,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$154,250 ($86,310–$346,100) n=1,332
Median gross rent$607$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$934 ($675–$1,653) n=1,170
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.7 yr ± 1.1678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (75.5–82.2) n=1,348

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.16 years of 76.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured