Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

62912

in Buncombe, IllinoisPopulation 1,515

46.71/ 100

Ranked #20,507 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 36%)

Ranked #1,029 of 1,368 Illinois ZIPs (bottom 25%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Home broadband subscription

60.3%

in the bottom 3.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST2nd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

52.8 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

23.9%

in the top 12.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US88th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

2.7 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 13.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST5th
US13th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

93.1 days/year

in the top 26% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US74th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

4.6 mi

in the top 30% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US70th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

33.8%

in the top 33% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US67th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, Buncombe, Illinois (ZIP 62912) stands in the bottom 36% nationally (20,507th) and the bottom 25% of Illinois (1,029th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

A profile of give and take, with clear readings each way: modeled pfas resides in the bottom 10.2% nationally. On the other side, home broadband subscription stands in the bottom 3.0% nationally, and fatal road crashes sits in the top 3.3% nationally. Poverty resides in the top 12.2% nationally, walkability stands in the bottom 13.0% nationally, and modeled mammography sits in the bottom 16% nationally. Recreation resides at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs. Physicians stands at the national minimum, shared with about 38% of ZIPs. Unemployment sits in the top 20% nationally. Childcare resides at the national minimum, shared with about 42% of ZIPs.

For clarity, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. ZIP 62920, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 65%

14%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 42%

11%

Disability

healthier than 41%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 49%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 33%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 22%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 40%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 39%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 31%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 87%

14%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 58%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 20%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 19%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 38%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 39%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 15%

8%

Disability

healthier than 22%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 15%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.0%28.1–33.9
High blood pressure among adults38.5%35.0–41.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.1%9.3–10.9
Current asthma among adults10.8%9.8–12.0
Coronary heart disease among adults8.3%7.5–9.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.4%8.2–10.7
Depression among adults23.8%20.8–26.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.1%11.6–14.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.8%35.3–42.3
Obesity among adults39.4%32.8–46.1
Stroke among adults4.2%3.8–4.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years16.4%14.0–19.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.7%6.2–9.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.8%76.5–81.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.0%76.0–81.6
Cholesterol screening among adults87.0%85.4–88.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.2%58.9–67.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults59.8%56.5–63.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years70.4%63.6–76.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.1%14.6–19.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.8%13.5–18.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.6%21.8–29.6
Short sleep duration among adults35.9%30.5–41.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.1%18.5–24.0
Frequent mental distress among adults17.6%15.8–19.5
Frequent physical distress among adults14.9%13.4–16.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.6%12.9–16.4
Any disability among adults33.3%29.6–37.3
Hearing disability among adults8.9%8.0–9.8
Independent living disability among adults9.4%8.3–10.5
Mobility disability among adults16.3%14.3–18.5
Self-care disability among adults4.3%3.8–4.8
Vision disability among adults5.3%4.8–6.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.5%20.5–26.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.2%12.0–16.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults14.8%12.3–17.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.0%9.4–12.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.6%6.6–8.7
Loneliness among adults32.8%28.9–37.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.4%6.4–8.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate23.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.4% (3.4–21.4%) n=1,378
Uninsured 18–645.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.6% (1.7–15.2%) n=1,375
No HS diploma (25+)2.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.5% (2.1–16.1%) n=1,377
Bachelor's or higher (25+)17.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.6% (9.3–49.2%) n=1,377
Unemployment rate (16+)7.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.7–10.0%) n=1,375
Households without a vehicle1.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–11.8%) n=1,377
Broadband subscription60.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.4% (77.4–96.0%) n=1,377
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)16.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.2% (10.7–34.7%) n=1,377
Homeownership rate88.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.9% (61.0–94.1%) n=1,377
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–4.1%) n=1,377
Foreign-born population0.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.4% (0.0–17.6%) n=1,378
Single-parent households53.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.8% (39.6–70.3%) n=1,372
Population 65+23.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–28.7%) n=1,378
Median age39.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.1 yr (34.3–52.1) n=1,373
Median household income$63,750$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,429 ($50,714–$114,949) n=1,334
Median home value$108,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$154,250 ($86,310–$346,100) n=1,332
Median gross rent$818$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$934 ($675–$1,653) n=1,170
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.3 yr ± 0.8378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (75.5–82.2) n=1,348

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.83 years of 77.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured