Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

62018

in Cottage Hills, IllinoisPopulation 3,184

40.04/ 100

Ranked #26,725 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 17%)

Ranked #1,306 of 1,368 Illinois ZIPs (bottom 4.6%)

Ranked #210 of 234 St. Louis, MO-IL ZIPs (bottom 10.3%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFAS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFAS — man-made “forever chemicals” that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down — were detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Lithium in drinking water

9.8 µg/L

in the bottom 5.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

30.8%

in the top 6.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

68.5%

in the bottom 8.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST9th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

38.3%

in the top 12.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US88th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$40,438

in the bottom 5.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST3rd
US6th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

42.7%

in the top 10.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

11.5%

in the top 14.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US85th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

16.4%

in the top 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US84th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

21.9%

in the top 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US84th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, Cottage Hills, Illinois (ZIP 62018) lands in the bottom 17% nationally (26,725th) and the bottom 4.6% of Illinois (1,306th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

Reading the numbers as a whole, the picture lands somewhere in between: lithium in drinking water stands in the bottom 5.9% nationally. On the other side, PFAS in drinking water rests at the national maximum, poverty registers in the top 6.4% nationally, and modeled mammography resides in the bottom 8.8% nationally. Unemployment settles in the top 12.2% nationally, and housing-cost burden is in the top 12.3% nationally. Household income sits in the bottom 5.9% nationally, and modeled obesity lands in the top 10.2% nationally. Modeled independent living disability lies in the top 14.6% nationally, and housing insecurity stands in the top 16% nationally.

Against the wider neighborhood, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put simply, PFAS in drinking water is the family of man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Lithium in drinking water is a natural metal that dissolves into some groundwater and has no federal drinking-water limit yet. On the overall standing, ZIP 62002, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the St. Louis, MO-IL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 71%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 34%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 10%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 38%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 15%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 14%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 14%

8%

Disability

healthier than 24%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 31%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 75%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 50%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 22%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 6%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 7%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 4%

11%

Mental Health

in the bottom 0.5%

8%

Disability

healthier than 6%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 15%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 58%

14%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 43%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 59%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 20%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 10%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 1%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 18%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 5%

8%

Disability

healthier than 17%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.8%26.4–33.3
High blood pressure among adults37.8%33.7–42.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.3%7.6–9.2
Current asthma among adults11.6%10.2–13.1
Coronary heart disease among adults7.6%6.8–8.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.3%9.0–11.6
Depression among adults25.0%21.4–29.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.1%11.3–15.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.8%32.6–41.1
Obesity among adults42.7%35.6–50.0
Stroke among adults4.1%3.8–4.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years16.8%13.7–20.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.1%8.4–12.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.0%71.5–78.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.7%72.9–80.1
Cholesterol screening among adults83.2%81.0–85.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years59.7%54.0–64.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults55.6%51.7–59.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years68.5%59.2–76.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.7%14.8–21.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults19.6%16.9–22.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.1%23.7–32.9
Short sleep duration among adults38.2%31.6–45.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.9%21.8–28.2
Frequent mental distress among adults20.6%18.3–23.0
Frequent physical distress among adults16.9%14.9–19.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.5%15.5–19.8
Any disability among adults37.1%32.6–41.9
Hearing disability among adults8.1%7.2–9.1
Independent living disability among adults11.5%10.2–12.9
Mobility disability among adults17.6%15.3–19.9
Self-care disability among adults5.3%4.7–5.9
Vision disability among adults6.6%5.9–7.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults26.9%23.4–30.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults21.9%18.9–25.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults23.5%20.3–26.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.4%14.2–18.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults11.0%9.7–12.5
Loneliness among adults35.5%30.6–40.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults11.1%9.7–12.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate30.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.4% (3.4–21.4%) n=1,378
Uninsured 18–647.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.6% (1.7–15.2%) n=1,375
No HS diploma (25+)20.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.5% (2.1–16.1%) n=1,377
Bachelor's or higher (25+)3.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.6% (9.3–49.2%) n=1,377
Unemployment rate (16+)9.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.7–10.0%) n=1,375
Households without a vehicle6.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–11.8%) n=1,377
Broadband subscription83.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.4% (77.4–96.0%) n=1,377
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)38.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.2% (10.7–34.7%) n=1,377
Homeownership rate67.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.9% (61.0–94.1%) n=1,377
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–4.1%) n=1,377
Foreign-born population0.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.4% (0.0–17.6%) n=1,378
Single-parent households24.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.8% (39.6–70.3%) n=1,372
Population 65+16.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–28.7%) n=1,378
Median age37.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.1 yr (34.3–52.1) n=1,373
Median household income$40,438$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,429 ($50,714–$114,949) n=1,334
Median home value$70,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$154,250 ($86,310–$346,100) n=1,332
Median gross rent$1,052$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$934 ($675–$1,653) n=1,170
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.7 yr ± 0.9578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (75.5–82.2) n=1,348

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.95 years of 75.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured