ZIP code
62861
in Maunie, IllinoisPopulation 57
40.26/ 100
Ranked #26,574 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 17%)
Ranked #1,305 of 1,368 Illinois ZIPs (bottom 4.7%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Floodplain exposure
100%
at the national maximum
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.
Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.
Full methodology ›Mammography
59.7%
in the bottom 0.7% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.
Full methodology ›Home broadband subscription
39.1%
in the bottom 0.9% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.
Full methodology ›Poverty rate
59.6%
in the top 1.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.
Full methodology ›Loud transportation noise
4.7%
in the top 1.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST97thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.
Full methodology ›Walkability
200 intersections/sq mi
in the top 2.5% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST95thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.
Full methodology ›Slow internet speeds
4.8%
in the top 2.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.
Full methodology ›Homeownership rate
100%
at the national maximum
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.
Full methodology ›Distance to an emergency room
26.2 mi
in the top 2.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS97thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.
Full methodology ›Expected annual disaster loss
$0
in the bottom 2.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS3rdDefinition & source ›
FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.
Full methodology ›The read
Maunie, Illinois (ZIP 62861), in overall standing, comes out in the bottom 17% nationally (26,574th) and the bottom 4.7% of Illinois (1,305th).
Here the data is straightforward about what defines the area: floodplain exposure lands at the national maximum, modeled mammography rests in the bottom 0.7% nationally, and home broadband subscription settles in the bottom 0.9% nationally. Poverty lands in the top 1.0% nationally, modeled loud transportation noise rests in the top 1.6% nationally, and slow internet speeds settles in the top 2.5% nationally. Distance to an emergency room lands in the top 2.7% nationally. Better still, walkability rests in the top 2.5% nationally, and homeownership settles at the national maximum. Modeled expected annual loss lands in the bottom 2.7% nationally.
Set within its surrounding area, loud transportation noise runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, for reference, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 62821, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Mental Health
healthier than 73%
8%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 15%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 21%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 18%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 28%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 36%
11%
Disability
healthier than 23%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 4%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 17%
5%
Lifting this score
Mental Health
healthier than 71%
8%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 3%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 18%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 27%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 20%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 25%
11%
Disability
healthier than 5%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 2%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 22%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
62821
Illinoisshares a border
Score 40.34
Closest healthier
47620
Indianaless than 0.1 mi away
Score 48.14
Similar health profile
66736
Kansas98% similar profile
Score 44.33
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 34.9% | 30.8–39.0 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 44.5% | 39.6–49.3 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 11.8% | 10.5–13.1 |
| Current asthma among adults | 9.7% | 8.5–11.0 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 10.9% | 9.5–12.6 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 11.4% | 9.2–14.0 |
| Depression among adults | 20.6% | 17.2–24.2 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 15.9% | 13.4–18.6 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 42.2% | 37.4–47.2 |
| Obesity among adults | 38.8% | 29.9–48.0 |
| Stroke among adults | 5.3% | 4.5–6.1 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 13.3% | 10.6–16.4 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 8.6% | 6.3–11.4 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 81.0% | 77.9–83.6 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 79.7% | 75.8–83.2 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 87.3% | 84.7–89.4 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 65.3% | 59.6–70.7 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 58.2% | 54.0–62.1 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 59.7% | 53.2–65.9 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 16.5% | 13.5–19.9 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 17.5% | 13.8–21.5 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 28.2% | 22.5–34.4 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 35.1% | 28.3–42.5 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 23.9% | 19.6–28.9 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 16.0% | 13.8–18.4 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 16.6% | 14.0–19.4 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 14.3% | 11.9–17.0 |
| Any disability among adults | 36.7% | 31.0–42.5 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 11.5% | 9.9–13.1 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 9.9% | 8.2–11.9 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 19.6% | 16.2–23.5 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 5.2% | 4.3–6.4 |
| Vision disability among adults | 6.2% | 5.1–7.5 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 24.2% | 19.9–28.6 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 14.3% | 11.0–18.1 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 14.7% | 11.2–18.8 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 10.5% | 8.4–12.8 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 7.6% | 6.2–9.1 |
| Loneliness among adults | 30.9% | 25.3–36.5 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 7.3% | 6.0–8.7 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | IL median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 59.6% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 9.4% (3.4–21.4%) n=1,378 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 52.5% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 6.6% (1.7–15.2%) n=1,375 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 23.7% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 6.5% (2.1–16.1%) n=1,377 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 0.0% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 21.6% (9.3–49.2%) n=1,377 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.2% (0.7–10.0%) n=1,375 |
| Households without a vehicle | 4.3% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 3.9% (0.0–11.8%) n=1,377 |
| Broadband subscription | 39.1% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 89.4% (77.4–96.0%) n=1,377 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 17.4% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 21.2% (10.7–34.7%) n=1,377 |
| Homeownership rate | 100.0% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 80.9% (61.0–94.1%) n=1,377 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 0.9% (0.0–4.1%) n=1,377 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 1.4% (0.0–17.6%) n=1,378 |
| Single-parent households | 8.3% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 53.8% (39.6–70.3%) n=1,372 |
| Population 65+ | 15.8% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 19.4% (12.1–28.7%) n=1,378 |
| Median age | 37.4 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 42.1 yr (34.3–52.1) n=1,373 |
| Median household income | $31,250 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $75,429 ($50,714–$114,949) n=1,334 |
| Median home value | $18,800 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $154,250 ($86,310–$346,100) n=1,332 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $934 ($675–$1,653) n=1,170 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | IL median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 76.8 yr ± 1.52 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 78.9 yr (75.5–82.2) n=1,348 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.52 years of 76.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured