Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

29053

in Gaston, South CarolinaPopulation 21,076

40.33/ 100

Ranked #26,528 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 17%)

Ranked #339 of 417 South Carolina ZIPs (bottom 19%)

Ranked #45 of 47 Columbia, SC ZIPs (bottom 4.3%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Mammography

67.2%

in the bottom 5.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

0.5 mi

in the bottom 5.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST9th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.21 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST87th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

56%

in the top 9.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

16.3%

in the top 8.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

61.8%

in the bottom 22% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST6th
US22nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

The read

Gaston, South Carolina (ZIP 29053), by its overall standing, sits in the bottom 17% nationally (26,528th) and the bottom 19% of South Carolina (339th).

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides of the ledger for this area: grocery lands in the top 6.8% nationally, and modeled arsenic is in the bottom 10.5% nationally. Set against that, modeled mammography resides in the bottom 5.9% nationally, distance to a Superfund site rests in the bottom 5.6% nationally, and modeled industrial-pollution burden lies in the top 6.5% nationally. Modeled pfas sits in the top 9.9% nationally, and food insecurity settles in the top 10.5% nationally. Modeled uninsured registers in the top 8.6% nationally, and housing insecurity stands in the top 11.4% nationally. Modeled utility shutoff lands in the top 12.0% nationally.

Held up against its neighbors, industrial-pollution burden runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined in plain terms, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 29073, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Columbia, SC metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 57%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 45%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 34%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 15%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 14%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 15%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 13%

8%

Disability

healthier than 20%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 32%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 56%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 54%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 32%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 39%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 6%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 15%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 6%

8%

Disability

healthier than 36%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 34%

5%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 63%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 41%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 54%

14%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 30%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 9%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 7%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 11%

8%

Disability

healthier than 22%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 33%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 75.1 ± 1.9 years. A median household income of $56,703 predicts 77.8 years — 2.7 years below.

    Ranked #3,757 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.4%26.8–32.0
High blood pressure among adults40.3%37.2–43.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.4%6.7–8.0
Current asthma among adults10.2%9.1–11.4
Coronary heart disease among adults7.3%6.7–8.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.8%8.9–10.7
Depression among adults26.4%23.4–29.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.3%13.7–17.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.9%34.7–41.0
Obesity among adults41.8%37.0–46.6
Stroke among adults4.4%4.1–4.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years21.2%18.1–24.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years16.3%14.4–18.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.1%75.5–80.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.4%77.5–82.9
Cholesterol screening among adults83.7%81.8–85.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years61.8%57.9–66.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults51.1%48.2–54.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years67.2%60.8–73.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.6%12.4–17.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults19.2%17.1–21.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults33.8%30.2–37.5
Short sleep duration among adults39.3%35.2–43.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults26.6%24.1–29.2
Frequent mental distress among adults19.7%17.7–21.7
Frequent physical distress among adults16.9%15.2–18.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.3%16.5–20.1
Any disability among adults36.1%32.7–39.5
Hearing disability among adults7.6%6.9–8.4
Independent living disability among adults11.5%10.4–12.6
Mobility disability among adults18.5%16.7–20.4
Self-care disability among adults5.8%5.4–6.3
Vision disability among adults7.5%7.0–8.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults25.2%22.4–28.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults25.5%23.0–28.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults17.0%15.1–19.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults18.5%16.5–20.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults12.1%10.9–13.4
Loneliness among adults32.1%28.7–35.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults12.7%11.3–14.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)SC median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate21.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.5% (6.2–28.7%) n=410
Uninsured 18–6424.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.1% (5.9–25.5%) n=412
No HS diploma (25+)17.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.6% (3.4–21.1%) n=417
Bachelor's or higher (25+)12.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.1% (9.1–48.9%) n=417
Unemployment rate (16+)6.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (0.2–11.1%) n=414
Households without a vehicle3.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.8% (0.0–13.6%) n=410
Broadband subscription92.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.1% (71.4–95.1%) n=410
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)23.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.3% (12.8–35.0%) n=410
Homeownership rate71.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.3% (54.9–91.8%) n=410
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–4.6%) n=410
Foreign-born population9.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.7% (0.0–9.0%) n=419
Single-parent households42.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (37.6–69.9%) n=404
Population 65+10.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.6% (10.9–31.7%) n=419
Median age35.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.4 yr (33.8–54.1) n=415
Median household income$56,703$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$58,990 ($40,800–$90,964) n=384
Median home value$126,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,400 ($88,260–$384,940) n=383
Median gross rent$1,000$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$950 ($678–$1,545) n=343
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)SC median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.1 yr ± 0.9678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.3 yr (73.2–79.9) n=389

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.96 years of 75.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured