Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

62010

in Bethalto, IllinoisPopulation 11,028

53.61/ 100

Ranked #11,218 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 35%)

Ranked #455 of 1,368 Illinois ZIPs (top 33%)

Ranked #85 of 234 St. Louis, MO-IL ZIPs (top 36%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Lithium in drinking water

9.7 µg/L

in the bottom 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Pharmacy access

0.37 per 1,000 residents

in the top 9.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Bethalto, Illinois (ZIP 62010) lands in the top 35% healthiest ZIPs nationally (11,218th) and the top 33% of Illinois (455th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

A number of measures place this area on solid footing: lithium in drinking water lies in the bottom 5.3% nationally, and pharmacy lands in the top 9.6% nationally. Childcare sits in the top 19% nationally, and distance to a community health center is in the bottom 24% nationally. Modeled tooth loss settles in the bottom 25% nationally. By contrast, modeled expected annual loss resides in the top 16% nationally, and binge drinking registers in the top 16% nationally. Recreation rests at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs. Modeled industrial-pollution burden stands in the top 21% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site lies in the bottom 24% nationally.

Set beside the nearby areas, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A note on the terms: lithium in drinking water is a natural metal that dissolves into some groundwater and has no federal drinking-water limit yet. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 62021, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the St. Louis, MO-IL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 62%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 61%

11%

Disability

healthier than 68%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 75%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 53%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 43%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 56%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 51%

8%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 31%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 61%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 63%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 68%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 69%

11%

Disability

healthier than 62%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 78%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 56%

14%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 38%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 15%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 61%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 63%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 74%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 66%

8%

Disability

healthier than 64%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 65%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 59%

13%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 43%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 29%

16%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.7%25.5–32.1
High blood pressure among adults35.3%31.4–39.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.6%8.7–10.6
Current asthma among adults10.5%9.2–11.8
Coronary heart disease among adults6.7%6.0–7.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.5%6.6–8.5
Depression among adults22.6%19.2–26.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.9%9.4–12.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.8%32.6–41.2
Obesity among adults37.2%30.8–44.2
Stroke among adults3.4%3.1–3.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.0%7.9–12.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.9%5.6–8.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.8%73.6–79.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.1%74.4–81.4
Cholesterol screening among adults87.1%85.2–88.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.1%60.8–70.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults65.3%61.5–69.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.8%66.6–81.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.4%15.3–21.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.2%11.2–15.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.6%18.0–25.7
Short sleep duration among adults34.4%28.2–41.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.9%15.6–20.6
Frequent mental distress among adults17.0%15.0–19.1
Frequent physical distress among adults13.6%12.0–15.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.0%11.4–14.8
Any disability among adults30.8%26.8–35.0
Hearing disability among adults7.4%6.6–8.4
Independent living disability among adults7.9%7.0–8.9
Mobility disability among adults13.7%11.9–15.8
Self-care disability among adults3.4%3.1–3.8
Vision disability among adults4.3%3.9–4.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.3%21.0–27.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.2%10.2–14.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.1%9.3–13.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.2%8.7–11.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.6%5.8–7.5
Loneliness among adults33.2%28.6–38.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.2%5.4–7.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.4% (3.4–21.4%) n=1,378
Uninsured 18–647.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.6% (1.7–15.2%) n=1,375
No HS diploma (25+)6.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.5% (2.1–16.1%) n=1,377
Bachelor's or higher (25+)31.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.6% (9.3–49.2%) n=1,377
Unemployment rate (16+)4.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.7–10.0%) n=1,375
Households without a vehicle3.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–11.8%) n=1,377
Broadband subscription91.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.4% (77.4–96.0%) n=1,377
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)20.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.2% (10.7–34.7%) n=1,377
Homeownership rate82.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.9% (61.0–94.1%) n=1,377
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–4.1%) n=1,377
Foreign-born population0.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.4% (0.0–17.6%) n=1,378
Single-parent households53.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.8% (39.6–70.3%) n=1,372
Population 65+22.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–28.7%) n=1,378
Median age41.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.1 yr (34.3–52.1) n=1,373
Median household income$71,408$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,429 ($50,714–$114,949) n=1,334
Median home value$183,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$154,250 ($86,310–$346,100) n=1,332
Median gross rent$988$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$934 ($675–$1,653) n=1,170
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.4 yr ± 0.8878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (75.5–82.2) n=1,348

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.88 years of 77.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured