Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

58638

in Hebron, North DakotaPopulation 874

52.87/ 100

Ranked #12,277 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 38%)

Ranked #258 of 371 North Dakota ZIPs (bottom 30%)

Ranked #16 of 19 Bismarck, ND ZIPs (bottom 16%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Elder-services access

0.91 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST88th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

176.2 mi

in the top 1.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST52nd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3.4 pCi/L

in the top 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST76th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

27.2%

in the bottom 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST37th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

2.1%

in the top 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST67th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

0.91 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

98.7%

in the top 5.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST67th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

18.4 mi

in the top 6.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST78th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

19.5 per million

in the bottom 7.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST19th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

0.91 per 1,000 residents

in the top 8.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, Hebron, North Dakota (ZIP 58638) ranks in the top 38% healthiest ZIPs nationally (12,277th) and the bottom 30% of North Dakota (258th).

continue reading

The measures split the difference for this area: elder services is in the top 0.9% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site stands in the top 1.3% nationally. Modeled loneliness settles in the bottom 3.8% nationally, and civic lies in the top 5.0% nationally. Fiber broadband resides in the top 5.4% nationally, modeled air-toxics cancer risk lands in the bottom 7.4% nationally, and dental providers registers in the top 8.3% nationally. Against that, modeled radon sits in the top 5.3% nationally, modeled fine-particle rests in the top 4.3% nationally, and distance to an emergency room is in the top 6.7% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs it borders, elder services runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plainer terms, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 58646, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Bismarck, ND metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 63%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 88%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 83%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 41%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 59%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 41%

11%

Disability

healthier than 56%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 28%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 12%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 65%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 47%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 45%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 47%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 53%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 34%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 37%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 25%

11%

Disability

healthier than 37%

7%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 50%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 50%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 57%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 57%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 14%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 36%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 21%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 36%

8%

Disability

healthier than 14%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.6%28.5–34.7
High blood pressure among adults38.4%34.9–41.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.6%9.7–11.5
Current asthma among adults10.1%9.0–11.3
Coronary heart disease among adults8.3%7.3–9.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.7%6.6–9.0
Depression among adults20.1%17.4–22.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.0%10.3–13.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.9%36.3–43.4
Obesity among adults39.5%34.2–44.9
Stroke among adults3.9%3.5–4.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.4%11.3–15.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.3%5.8–9.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.0%78.3–83.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.2%74.2–80.0
Cholesterol screening among adults85.9%84.1–87.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.8%61.8–69.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.0%59.8–66.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.1%71.3–82.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.1%16.5–22.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.1%12.5–17.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.8%21.8–29.9
Short sleep duration among adults33.4%29.2–38.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.5%15.8–21.2
Frequent mental distress among adults13.5%11.9–15.2
Frequent physical distress among adults13.1%11.5–14.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.3%10.6–14.0
Any disability among adults30.5%26.7–34.3
Hearing disability among adults9.9%8.8–11.1
Independent living disability among adults7.6%6.5–8.6
Mobility disability among adults14.3%12.2–16.5
Self-care disability among adults3.8%3.3–4.4
Vision disability among adults4.6%4.0–5.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.5%17.6–23.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.2%8.5–12.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.4%5.1–8.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.3%7.0–9.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.8%5.1–6.8
Loneliness among adults27.2%23.7–31.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.4%4.6–6.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ND median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.0% (1.0–21.4%) n=380
Uninsured 18–6413.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.5% (0.0–19.2%) n=380
No HS diploma (25+)8.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.3% (0.6–13.4%) n=382
Bachelor's or higher (25+)17.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.6% (12.5–41.0%) n=382
Unemployment rate (16+)1.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2741.1% (0.0–6.5%) n=382
Households without a vehicle1.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–7.4%) n=379
Broadband subscription88.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.7% (75.3–98.1%) n=379
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)16.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32215.2% (4.0–28.2%) n=379
Homeownership rate76.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.5% (59.2–98.7%) n=379
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.0% (0.0–4.6%) n=379
Foreign-born population0.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.9% (0.0–5.7%) n=383
Single-parent households59.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08759.3% (40.0–83.3%) n=377
Population 65+24.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55321.6% (9.1–38.9%) n=383
Median age41.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.9 yr (31.1–60.2) n=381
Median household income$63,854$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$79,666 ($56,729–$115,391) n=354
Median home value$108,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$159,750 ($88,870–$297,180) n=328
Median gross rent$867$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$767 ($513–$1,222) n=212
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ND median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.0 yr ± 0.9778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.6–84.0) n=379

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.97 years of 80.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured