ZIP code
58566
in Saint Anthony, North DakotaPopulation 272
58.72/ 100
Ranked #5,815 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 18%)
Ranked #56 of 371 North Dakota ZIPs (top 15%)
Ranked #4 of 19 Bismarck, ND ZIPs (top 21%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Binge drinking
24%
in the top 0.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST96thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.
Full methodology ›Distance to a Superfund site
193.2 mi
in the top 1.1% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST60thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.
Full methodology ›Floodplain exposure
0.00%
at the national minimum
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.
Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.
Full methodology ›Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance
2.2%
in the top 4.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST71stUS96thDefinition & source ›
The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.
Full methodology ›Loneliness
27.5%
in the bottom 5.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST46thUS5thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.
Full methodology ›Poverty rate
1.1%
in the bottom 5.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST11thUS5thDefinition & source ›
The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.
Full methodology ›Slow internet speeds
2.1%
in the top 5.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST71stUS95thDefinition & source ›
The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.
Full methodology ›Fiber broadband
97.9%
in the top 6.9% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST52ndUS93rdDefinition & source ›
The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.
Full methodology ›Mobility disability
8.8%
in the bottom 5.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST5thUS5thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.
Full methodology ›Radon
3.1 pCi/L
in the top 9.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST30thUS91stDefinition & source ›
The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.
Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.
Full methodology ›The read
Saint Anthony, North Dakota (ZIP 58566), overall, ranks in the top 18% healthiest ZIPs nationally (5,815th) and the top 15% of North Dakota (56th).
Taken together, the data gives a genuinely mixed reading: distance to a Superfund site resides in the top 1.1% nationally, floodplain exposure settles at the national minimum, and modeled loneliness is in the bottom 5.0% nationally. Poverty sits in the bottom 5.4% nationally, fiber broadband lands in the top 6.9% nationally, and modeled mobility disability lies in the bottom 5.0% nationally. On the other side, modeled binge drinking stands in the top 0.8% nationally, and fine-particle rests in the top 4.0% nationally. Slow internet speeds registers in the top 5.5% nationally, and modeled radon resides in the top 9.4% nationally.
Defined simply, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. ZIP 58504, about 4.5 miles away, comes out healthier overall.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Bismarck, ND metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 87%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 63%
16%
Mental Health
healthier than 81%
8%
Disability
healthier than 92%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 87%
5%
About typical
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 40%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 42%
13%
Holding it back
Risk Behavior
healthier than 27%
11%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 11%
5%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 92%
21%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 69%
14%
Disability
healthier than 93%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 67%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 62%
5%
About typical
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 46%
16%
Holding it back
Preventive Care
healthier than 18%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 12%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 22%
8%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
in the top 0.00%
21%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 79%
14%
Disability
in the top 0.00%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 86%
5%
About typical
Healthcare Access
healthier than 50%
5%
Holding it back
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 29%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 21%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 7%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 14%
8%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
58535
North Dakotashares a border
Score 57.02
Closest healthier
58504
North Dakotaabout 4.5 mi away
Score 59.22
Similar health profile
52046
Iowa97% similar profile
Score 58.16
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 23.3% | 20.3–26.2 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 29.4% | 25.9–33.0 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 7.6% | 6.7–8.4 |
| Current asthma among adults | 9.9% | 8.6–11.2 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 5.0% | 4.3–5.8 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 4.9% | 4.0–6.0 |
| Depression among adults | 21.2% | 18.0–24.4 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 8.0% | 6.7–9.3 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 33.4% | 29.7–37.1 |
| Obesity among adults | 38.7% | 32.5–44.6 |
| Stroke among adults | 2.4% | 2.1–2.8 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 8.5% | 6.8–10.5 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 6.0% | 4.3–8.2 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 73.5% | 69.8–76.7 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 73.4% | 69.3–77.1 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 84.4% | 81.4–87.0 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 63.8% | 59.4–68.3 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 67.3% | 64.1–70.6 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 79.3% | 73.1–85.2 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 24.0% | 20.4–27.8 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 14.2% | 10.8–17.7 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 20.3% | 15.9–24.7 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 33.9% | 29.1–39.6 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 13.6% | 11.0–16.6 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 14.2% | 12.0–16.4 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 10.3% | 8.7–12.1 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 11.3% | 9.2–13.5 |
| Any disability among adults | 23.0% | 19.0–27.1 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 6.4% | 5.6–7.3 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 5.7% | 4.7–6.9 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 8.8% | 7.2–10.6 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 2.5% | 2.1–3.0 |
| Vision disability among adults | 3.1% | 2.6–3.6 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 20.4% | 17.0–24.3 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 8.4% | 6.3–11.1 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 5.0% | 3.5–6.9 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 8.1% | 6.3–10.2 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 5.1% | 4.1–6.2 |
| Loneliness among adults | 27.5% | 23.4–32.2 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 5.2% | 4.1–6.3 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | ND median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 1.1% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 8.0% (1.0–21.4%) n=380 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 2.3% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 6.5% (0.0–19.2%) n=380 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 4.6% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 6.3% (0.6–13.4%) n=382 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 22.9% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 24.6% (12.5–41.0%) n=382 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 1.1% (0.0–6.5%) n=382 |
| Households without a vehicle | 0.9% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 1.5% (0.0–7.4%) n=379 |
| Broadband subscription | 90.6% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 88.7% (75.3–98.1%) n=379 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 27.4% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 15.2% (4.0–28.2%) n=379 |
| Homeownership rate | 68.9% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 83.5% (59.2–98.7%) n=379 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 0.0% (0.0–4.6%) n=379 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 0.9% (0.0–5.7%) n=383 |
| Single-parent households | 52.9% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 59.3% (40.0–83.3%) n=377 |
| Population 65+ | 8.8% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 21.6% (9.1–38.9%) n=383 |
| Median age | 31.4 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 42.9 yr (31.1–60.2) n=381 |
| Median household income | $52,097 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $79,666 ($56,729–$115,391) n=354 |
| Median home value | $310,000 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $159,750 ($88,870–$297,180) n=328 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $767 ($513–$1,222) n=212 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | ND median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 86.2 yr ± 3.02 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 80.0 yr (77.6–84.0) n=379 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 3.02 years of 86.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured