ZIP code
58558
in Menoken, North DakotaPopulation 899
58.52/ 100
Ranked #5,979 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 19%)
Ranked #60 of 371 North Dakota ZIPs (top 16%)
Ranked #5 of 19 Bismarck, ND ZIPs (top 26%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Distance to a Superfund site
212.1 mi
in the top 0.9% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST69thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.
Full methodology ›Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance
2.2%
in the top 4.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST71stUS96thDefinition & source ›
The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.
Full methodology ›Loneliness
27.4%
in the bottom 4.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST42ndUS4thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.
Full methodology ›Binge drinking
20.4%
in the top 4.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST67thUS95thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.
Full methodology ›Arsenic in groundwater
21.3%
in the top 5.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS94thDefinition & source ›
The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.
A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.
Full methodology ›Recreation access
1 per 1,000 residents
in the top 8.4% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST75thUS92ndDefinition & source ›
The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.
Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.
Full methodology ›Crowded housing
5.8%
in the top 11.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST93rdUS89thDefinition & source ›
The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.
Full methodology ›Unemployment rate
7.5%
in the top 18% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST92ndUS82ndDefinition & source ›
The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.
Full methodology ›Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility
5 mi
in the top 28% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST93rdUS72ndDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.
Full methodology ›The read
By the composite health measure, Menoken, North Dakota (ZIP 58558) ranks in the top 19% healthiest ZIPs nationally (5,979th) and the top 16% of North Dakota (60th).
The picture here is genuinely mixed, with readings on both sides: distance to a Superfund site rests in the top 0.9% nationally, and modeled loneliness stands in the bottom 4.5% nationally. Recreation lies in the top 8.4% nationally, and housing-cost burden lands in the bottom 10.7% nationally. Modeled short sleep sits in the bottom 11.5% nationally. On the other side, modeled fine-particle is in the top 4.0% nationally, binge drinking settles in the top 4.8% nationally, and arsenic resides in the top 5.9% nationally. Modeled radon registers in the top 11.6% nationally, and crowded housing rests in the top 11.3% nationally.
To spell things out, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Close by, ZIP 58503, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Bismarck, ND metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 71%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 80%
16%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 62%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 90%
8%
Disability
healthier than 77%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 81%
5%
About typical
Preventive Care
healthier than 52%
13%
Holding it back
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 27%
14%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 27%
5%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 77%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 76%
16%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 65%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 62%
8%
Disability
healthier than 70%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 83%
5%
About typical
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 44%
14%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 48%
5%
Holding it back
Preventive Care
healthier than 29%
13%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 71%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 64%
16%
Disability
healthier than 71%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 71%
5%
About typical
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 43%
14%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 50%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 43%
8%
Holding it back
Preventive Care
healthier than 36%
13%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 36%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
58501
North Dakotashares a border
Score 58.15
Closest healthier
58503
North Dakotashares a border
Score 65.54
Similar health profile
58436
North Dakota99% similar profile
Score 55.70
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 27.5% | 24.7–30.3 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 32.7% | 29.6–35.9 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 8.8% | 7.9–9.7 |
| Current asthma among adults | 10.0% | 8.8–11.3 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 6.2% | 5.4–7.1 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 6.5% | 5.4–7.7 |
| Depression among adults | 19.6% | 16.9–22.4 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 10.3% | 8.8–11.8 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 36.3% | 33.1–39.6 |
| Obesity among adults | 37.7% | 33.1–42.4 |
| Stroke among adults | 3.1% | 2.8–3.6 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 12.0% | 9.6–14.5 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 6.4% | 4.9–8.0 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 77.7% | 74.5–80.6 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 75.4% | 72.0–78.4 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 85.6% | 83.3–87.6 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 65.1% | 61.0–69.1 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 69.6% | 66.5–72.6 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 75.5% | 69.0–81.5 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 20.4% | 17.6–23.4 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 14.5% | 11.7–17.6 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 20.0% | 16.5–23.7 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 30.4% | 26.4–34.6 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 16.0% | 13.4–18.9 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 13.3% | 11.5–15.2 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 11.9% | 10.2–13.7 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 11.9% | 9.9–13.7 |
| Any disability among adults | 28.2% | 24.4–32.2 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 7.6% | 6.7–8.6 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 6.6% | 5.6–7.8 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 12.0% | 10.0–14.2 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 3.4% | 2.9–4.0 |
| Vision disability among adults | 4.0% | 3.4–4.6 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 19.6% | 16.6–22.7 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 9.3% | 7.2–12.0 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 6.1% | 4.5–8.1 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 7.7% | 6.2–9.5 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 5.5% | 4.6–6.6 |
| Loneliness among adults | 27.4% | 23.8–31.1 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 5.3% | 4.3–6.3 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | ND median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 6.2% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 8.0% (1.0–21.4%) n=380 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 6.5% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 6.5% (0.0–19.2%) n=380 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 4.3% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 6.3% (0.6–13.4%) n=382 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 38.3% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 24.6% (12.5–41.0%) n=382 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 7.5% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 1.1% (0.0–6.5%) n=382 |
| Households without a vehicle | 1.0% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 1.5% (0.0–7.4%) n=379 |
| Broadband subscription | 95.8% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 88.7% (75.3–98.1%) n=379 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 11.0% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 15.2% (4.0–28.2%) n=379 |
| Homeownership rate | 83.5% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 83.5% (59.2–98.7%) n=379 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 5.8% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 0.0% (0.0–4.6%) n=379 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.6% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 0.9% (0.0–5.7%) n=383 |
| Single-parent households | 54.3% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 59.3% (40.0–83.3%) n=377 |
| Population 65+ | 12.6% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 21.6% (9.1–38.9%) n=383 |
| Median age | 35.5 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 42.9 yr (31.1–60.2) n=381 |
| Median household income | $104,550 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $79,666 ($56,729–$115,391) n=354 |
| Median home value | $286,000 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $159,750 ($88,870–$297,180) n=328 |
| Median gross rent | $2,141 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $767 ($513–$1,222) n=212 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | ND median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 80.5 yr ± 0.82 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 80.0 yr (77.6–84.0) n=379 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.82 years of 80.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured