Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

58646

in Mott, North DakotaPopulation 1,161

53.38/ 100

Ranked #11,519 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 36%)

Ranked #231 of 371 North Dakota ZIPs (bottom 38%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Grocery access

0.92 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Pharmacy access

0.92 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

43.8 mi

in the top 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

0 per 100,000 residents per year

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

140 mi

in the top 2.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST31st
US98th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

0.92 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST81st
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

10 per million

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

99.1%

in the top 4.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST74th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

14.4 mi

in the top 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST79th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

27.9%

in the bottom 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST59th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Mott, North Dakota (ZIP 58646) lands in the top 36% healthiest ZIPs nationally (11,519th) and the bottom 38% of North Dakota (231st), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The signals balance out across the profile, strengths against concerns: grocery is in the top 0.5% nationally, and pharmacy settles in the top 1.3% nationally. Fatal road crashes resides at the national minimum, and distance to a Superfund site registers in the top 2.0% nationally. Childcare rests in the top 2.8% nationally, modeled air-toxics cancer risk stands in the bottom 2.8% nationally, and fiber broadband lies in the top 4.6% nationally. Modeled loneliness lands in the bottom 6.8% nationally. Set against that, distance to a community health center sits in the top 1.7% nationally, and distance to a nursing home is in the top 5.8% nationally.

Set beside the nearby areas, grocery runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A note on the terms: distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Distance to a community health center is a federally funded (HRSA) community health center serving everyone regardless of ability to pay. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 58641, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 63%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 73%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 78%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 63%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 94%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 84%

5%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 50%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 28%

21%

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.6%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 95%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 77%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 66%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 86%

8%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 45%

16%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 53%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 17%

21%

Disability

healthier than 29%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 6%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.2%30.3–38.0
High blood pressure among adults41.0%36.4–45.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults12.3%11.1–13.6
Current asthma among adults10.0%8.7–11.3
Coronary heart disease among adults9.1%7.9–10.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.3%6.9–9.8
Depression among adults19.0%16.0–22.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.9%11.0–15.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.0%36.3–45.8
Obesity among adults37.0%29.2–45.5
Stroke among adults4.4%3.9–5.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years16.5%13.5–19.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.6%5.2–8.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure83.4%80.7–85.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.2%75.8–82.5
Cholesterol screening among adults88.3%86.7–89.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.5%63.9–74.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.2%59.2–67.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.1%68.0–83.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.9%14.0–20.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.1%11.5–16.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.9%21.2–31.2
Short sleep duration among adults32.3%25.8–39.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.5%15.5–21.9
Frequent mental distress among adults12.5%10.9–14.3
Frequent physical distress among adults13.7%11.8–15.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.6%9.9–13.4
Any disability among adults32.1%27.4–36.9
Hearing disability among adults11.1%9.7–12.5
Independent living disability among adults7.7%6.5–9.0
Mobility disability among adults15.7%13.2–18.6
Self-care disability among adults3.9%3.3–4.6
Vision disability among adults4.7%4.0–5.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.5%17.1–24.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.3%7.3–11.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults5.8%4.5–7.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.2%5.9–8.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.3%4.4–6.1
Loneliness among adults27.9%23.2–33.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.6%3.9–5.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ND median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate11.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.0% (1.0–21.4%) n=380
Uninsured 18–644.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.5% (0.0–19.2%) n=380
No HS diploma (25+)7.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.3% (0.6–13.4%) n=382
Bachelor's or higher (25+)23.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.6% (12.5–41.0%) n=382
Unemployment rate (16+)2.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2741.1% (0.0–6.5%) n=382
Households without a vehicle4.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–7.4%) n=379
Broadband subscription90.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.7% (75.3–98.1%) n=379
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)16.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32215.2% (4.0–28.2%) n=379
Homeownership rate75.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.5% (59.2–98.7%) n=379
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.0% (0.0–4.6%) n=379
Foreign-born population0.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.9% (0.0–5.7%) n=383
Single-parent households53.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08759.3% (40.0–83.3%) n=377
Population 65+26.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55321.6% (9.1–38.9%) n=383
Median age42.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.9 yr (31.1–60.2) n=381
Median household income$56,667$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$79,666 ($56,729–$115,391) n=354
Median home value$92,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$159,750 ($88,870–$297,180) n=328
Median gross rent$500$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$767 ($513–$1,222) n=212
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ND median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.3 yr ± 2.5778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.6–84.0) n=379

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.57 years of 76.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured