Skip to main content
ZipVitals

Menu

ZIP code

58564

in Raleigh, North DakotaPopulation 102

ZipVitals Score
How is the ZipVitals Score calculated? →

47.63/ 100

Ranked #19,415 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 39%)

Ranked #342 of 371 North Dakota ZIPs (bottom 7.9%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fiber broadband

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

34.2 mi

in the top 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

12.9%

in the top 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

160.4 mi

in the top 1.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST43rd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

38.6 mi

in the top 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

10 per million

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

5.9%

in the top 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

11.1%

in the top 3.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Raleigh, North Dakota (ZIP 58564) lands in the bottom 39% nationally (19,415th) and the bottom 7.9% of North Dakota (342nd).

continue reading

Where the load on this area runs deepest, the data leads: distance to a nursing home lands in the top 1.2% nationally, and modeled hearing disability sits in the top 2.1% nationally. Distance to a community health center is in the top 2.3% nationally, and modeled energy burden settles in the top 3.3% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease resides in the top 3.9% nationally. More encouragingly, fiber broadband registers at the national maximum, distance to a Superfund site rests in the top 1.6% nationally, and modeled transportation noise stands at the national minimum. Home broadband subscription lies at the national maximum, and modeled air-toxics cancer risk lands in the bottom 2.8% nationally.

A note on the terms: distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 58535, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 96%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 66%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 91%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 83%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 50%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 13%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 32%

16%

Disability

healthier than 27%

7%

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.2%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

in the top 0.00%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 67%

8%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 47%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 4%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 15%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 36%

11%

Disability

healthier than 9%

7%

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.00%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults35.5%31.3–39.6
High blood pressure among adults44.7%39.7–49.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults12.1%10.7–13.5
Current asthma among adults10.1%8.7–11.5
Coronary heart disease among adults11.1%9.4–12.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.3%7.8–13.2
Depression among adults19.2%16.0–22.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.6%12.9–18.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.9%36.2–45.5
Obesity among adults41.0%32.3–49.8
Stroke among adults5.1%4.2–6.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years16.7%13.6–19.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.6%6.1–11.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure83.6%81.0–85.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.3%74.7–81.7
Cholesterol screening among adults84.9%82.5–87.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.2%65.7–75.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults58.3%54.2–62.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.4%69.3–84.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.0%14.0–20.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.3%12.4–20.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.2%22.8–35.8
Short sleep duration among adults31.2%24.8–38.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.3%17.7–27.4
Frequent mental distress among adults13.3%11.3–15.4
Frequent physical distress among adults15.0%12.4–18.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.3%10.9–15.9
Any disability among adults35.5%29.4–41.7
Hearing disability among adults12.9%11.0–14.8
Independent living disability among adults8.8%7.1–10.8
Mobility disability among adults17.8%13.9–22.0
Self-care disability among adults4.7%3.7–6.0
Vision disability among adults5.9%4.7–7.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.5%16.4–24.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.3%8.9–16.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.7%6.0–12.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.4%6.5–10.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.1%5.6–8.7
Loneliness among adults27.3%21.7–33.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.9%4.7–7.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ND median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate3.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.0% (1.0–21.4%) n=380
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.5% (0.0–19.2%) n=380
No HS diploma (25+)0.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.3% (0.6–13.4%) n=382
Bachelor's or higher (25+)14.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.6% (12.5–41.0%) n=382
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2741.1% (0.0–6.5%) n=382
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–7.4%) n=379
Broadband subscription100.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.7% (75.3–98.1%) n=379
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)5.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32215.2% (4.0–28.2%) n=379
Homeownership rate96.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.5% (59.2–98.7%) n=379
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.0% (0.0–4.6%) n=379
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.9% (0.0–5.7%) n=383
Single-parent households45.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08759.3% (40.0–83.3%) n=377
Population 65+20.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55321.6% (9.1–38.9%) n=383
Median age39.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.9 yr (31.1–60.2) n=381
Median household income$80,625$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$79,666 ($56,729–$115,391) n=354
Median home value—$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$159,750 ($88,870–$297,180) n=328
Median gross rent—$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$767 ($513–$1,222) n=212
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ND median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.3 yr ± 1.5878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.6–84.0) n=379

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.58 years of 79.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured