Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

58562

in New Leipzig, North DakotaPopulation 400

47.93/ 100

Ranked #19,009 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 41%)

Ranked #337 of 371 North Dakota ZIPs (bottom 9.2%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Hearing disability

13.1%

in the top 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

45.1 mi

in the top 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

145.3 mi

in the top 1.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST34th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

10 per million

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

11.3%

in the top 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

27.3%

in the bottom 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST39th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3.3 pCi/L

in the top 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST56th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

13.9 mi

in the top 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST78th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

1.9%

in the top 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST65th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

98.1%

in the top 6.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST57th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, New Leipzig, North Dakota (ZIP 58562) lands in the bottom 41% nationally (19,009th) and the bottom 9.2% of North Dakota (337th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

Several serious readings shape the profile and deserve first mention: modeled hearing disability rests in the top 1.8% nationally, distance to a community health center registers in the top 1.5% nationally, and modeled coronary heart disease resides in the top 3.3% nationally. Modeled radon settles in the top 7.0% nationally, distance to a nursing home is in the top 6.2% nationally, and slow internet speeds sits in the top 6.3% nationally. On the better side, distance to a Superfund site lands in the top 1.9% nationally, and modeled air-toxics cancer risk lies in the bottom 2.8% nationally. Modeled loneliness stands in the bottom 4.1% nationally, and fiber broadband rests in the top 6.4% nationally.

Put simply, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. On the overall standing, ZIP 57638, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 77%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 78%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 62%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 91%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 83%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 11%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 31%

16%

Disability

healthier than 24%

7%

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.7%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 95%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 77%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 64%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 69%

8%

About typical

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 50%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 4%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 15%

16%

Disability

healthier than 7%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 9%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults37.5%33.9–41.1
High blood pressure among adults45.3%41.2–49.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults12.7%11.6–13.9
Current asthma among adults10.2%9.1–11.4
Coronary heart disease among adults11.3%10.0–12.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.5%8.8–12.2
Depression among adults19.5%16.6–22.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.6%13.5–17.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.7%37.5–45.8
Obesity among adults40.3%33.1–47.7
Stroke among adults5.4%4.7–6.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years16.5%13.8–19.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.5%6.0–9.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure84.8%82.5–86.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.9%76.8–82.7
Cholesterol screening among adults87.2%85.4–88.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.8%67.0–76.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults62.1%58.5–65.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.1%67.7–81.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.4%13.0–18.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.7%12.9–18.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults30.1%25.5–35.3
Short sleep duration among adults30.6%25.2–36.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.4%19.2–25.8
Frequent mental distress among adults13.0%11.4–14.7
Frequent physical distress among adults15.5%13.5–17.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.9%11.2–14.8
Any disability among adults36.0%31.5–40.6
Hearing disability among adults13.1%11.7–14.6
Independent living disability among adults9.3%8.0–10.7
Mobility disability among adults19.1%16.2–21.9
Self-care disability among adults5.0%4.3–5.8
Vision disability among adults6.1%5.3–7.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.1%16.6–23.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.8%9.4–14.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.5%6.6–10.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.1%6.6–9.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.5%5.5–7.7
Loneliness among adults27.3%22.4–32.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.6%4.6–6.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ND median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.0% (1.0–21.4%) n=380
Uninsured 18–645.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.5% (0.0–19.2%) n=380
No HS diploma (25+)1.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.3% (0.6–13.4%) n=382
Bachelor's or higher (25+)19.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.6% (12.5–41.0%) n=382
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2741.1% (0.0–6.5%) n=382
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–7.4%) n=379
Broadband subscription80.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.7% (75.3–98.1%) n=379
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)20.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32215.2% (4.0–28.2%) n=379
Homeownership rate89.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.5% (59.2–98.7%) n=379
Crowded housing (>1 per room)4.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.0% (0.0–4.6%) n=379
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.9% (0.0–5.7%) n=383
Single-parent households63.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08759.3% (40.0–83.3%) n=377
Population 65+28.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55321.6% (9.1–38.9%) n=383
Median age45.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.9 yr (31.1–60.2) n=381
Median household income$62,955$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$79,666 ($56,729–$115,391) n=354
Median home value$100,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$159,750 ($88,870–$297,180) n=328
Median gross rent$828$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$767 ($513–$1,222) n=212
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ND median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.0 yr ± 1.4578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.6–84.0) n=379

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.45 years of 78.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured