Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

58563

in New Salem, North DakotaPopulation 1,961

54.51/ 100

Ranked #10,057 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 31%)

Ranked #178 of 371 North Dakota ZIPs (top 48%)

Ranked #15 of 19 Bismarck, ND ZIPs (bottom 21%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Distance to a Superfund site

187.9 mi

in the top 1.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST58th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.5 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST78th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

56.1 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

2.6%

in the top 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3.4 pCi/L

in the top 5.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST68th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

27.4%

in the bottom 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST42nd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Pharmacy access

0.5 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST77th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

98.6%

in the top 5.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST63rd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

1.4%

in the top 8.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST59th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

The read

Judged by its overall standing, New Salem, North Dakota (ZIP 58563) sits in the top 31% healthiest ZIPs nationally (10,057th) and the top 48% of North Dakota (178th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

An even profile, with readings pulling both ways: distance to a Superfund site lies in the top 1.2% nationally, elder services registers in the top 2.4% nationally, and modeled loneliness is in the bottom 4.5% nationally. Pharmacy lies in the top 5.2% nationally, fiber broadband registers in the top 5.6% nationally, and childcare is in the top 10.7% nationally. Against that, fatal road crashes lies in the top 2.8% nationally, and modeled fine-particle registers in the top 3.1% nationally. Modeled radon is in the top 5.9% nationally, and slow internet speeds lies in the top 8.2% nationally.

Put plainly, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 58530, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Bismarck, ND metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 65%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 67%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 89%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 80%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 44%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 52%

11%

Disability

healthier than 58%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 51%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 26%

14%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 92%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 49%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 42%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 48%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 52%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 46%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 38%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 38%

11%

Disability

healthier than 39%

7%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 74%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 81%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 16%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 38%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 39%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 34%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 38%

8%

Disability

healthier than 19%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 33%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.1%29.1–35.1
High blood pressure among adults37.9%34.3–41.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.2%10.2–12.2
Current asthma among adults10.1%9.0–11.3
Coronary heart disease among adults8.1%7.2–9.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.5%6.5–8.6
Depression among adults20.1%17.5–22.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.4%10.0–13.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.5%35.9–43.0
Obesity among adults37.9%32.7–43.0
Stroke among adults3.9%3.5–4.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.0%10.7–15.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.7%5.4–8.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.4%78.9–83.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.7%74.7–80.5
Cholesterol screening among adults86.3%84.4–87.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.7%63.8–71.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults65.8%62.6–68.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.8%69.7–81.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.8%16.3–21.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.2%12.1–16.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.6%21.7–29.6
Short sleep duration among adults32.3%28.2–37.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.7%15.3–20.3
Frequent mental distress among adults13.3%11.7–14.8
Frequent physical distress among adults12.9%11.4–14.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.0%10.5–13.5
Any disability among adults30.4%26.7–34.2
Hearing disability among adults10.1%8.9–11.3
Independent living disability among adults7.6%6.6–8.6
Mobility disability among adults14.4%12.5–16.5
Self-care disability among adults3.6%3.2–4.1
Vision disability among adults4.5%4.0–5.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.2%17.5–23.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.5%7.8–11.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults5.9%4.7–7.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.7%6.5–9.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.5%4.8–6.3
Loneliness among adults27.4%23.9–31.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.0%4.3–5.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ND median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.0% (1.0–21.4%) n=380
Uninsured 18–646.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.5% (0.0–19.2%) n=380
No HS diploma (25+)7.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.3% (0.6–13.4%) n=382
Bachelor's or higher (25+)17.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.6% (12.5–41.0%) n=382
Unemployment rate (16+)0.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2741.1% (0.0–6.5%) n=382
Households without a vehicle5.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–7.4%) n=379
Broadband subscription87.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.7% (75.3–98.1%) n=379
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)18.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32215.2% (4.0–28.2%) n=379
Homeownership rate86.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.5% (59.2–98.7%) n=379
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.0% (0.0–4.6%) n=379
Foreign-born population0.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.9% (0.0–5.7%) n=383
Single-parent households66.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08759.3% (40.0–83.3%) n=377
Population 65+22.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55321.6% (9.1–38.9%) n=383
Median age48.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.9 yr (31.1–60.2) n=381
Median household income$78,214$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$79,666 ($56,729–$115,391) n=354
Median home value$219,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$159,750 ($88,870–$297,180) n=328
Median gross rent$857$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$767 ($513–$1,222) n=212
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ND median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.0 yr ± 1.0978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.6–84.0) n=379

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.09 years of 80.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured