Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

58554

in Mandan, North DakotaPopulation 29,479

57.17/ 100

Ranked #7,107 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 22%)

Ranked #89 of 371 North Dakota ZIPs (top 24%)

Ranked #10 of 19 Bismarck, ND ZIPs (bottom 47%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

192.9 mi

in the top 1.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST60th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

21.9%

in the top 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$1

in the top 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

2.7%

in the top 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

28.3%

in the bottom 9.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST68th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

125 units

in the top 16% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US84th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

8.3%

in the bottom 14.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US15th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 22% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US78th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.035 per 1,000 residents

in the top 22% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US78th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, Mandan, North Dakota (ZIP 58554) stands in the top 22% healthiest ZIPs nationally (7,107th) and the top 24% of North Dakota (89th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

Several signals sit on each side of the ledger here: distance to a Superfund site rests in the top 1.1% nationally, and modeled loneliness lands in the bottom 9.0% nationally. Distance to a nursing home settles at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Modeled diabetes rests in the bottom 10.7% nationally, and mobility disability lands in the bottom 13.6% nationally. Working the other way, modeled disaster risk settles in the top 0.4% nationally, binge drinking rests in the top 1.9% nationally, and expected annual loss lands in the top 1.8% nationally. Modeled fine-particle settles in the top 2.9% nationally, and radon rests in the top 10.8% nationally.

Set beside the wider area around it, expected annual loss runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For clarity, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. ZIP 58501, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Bismarck, ND metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 78%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 81%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 81%

8%

Disability

healthier than 81%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 69%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 69%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 41%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 40%

11%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 17%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 84%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 79%

16%

Disability

healthier than 77%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 94%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 23%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 16%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 22%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 21%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 26%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 80%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 66%

16%

Disability

healthier than 82%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 84%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

in the bottom 0.00%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 11%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 20%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 7%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 19%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.8%22.9–28.7
High blood pressure among adults31.7%28.4–35.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.5%7.7–9.3
Current asthma among adults10.3%9.0–11.6
Coronary heart disease among adults5.9%5.3–6.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.8%5.1–6.6
Depression among adults21.2%18.1–24.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.3%8.0–10.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.0%31.4–38.7
Obesity among adults38.3%32.6–44.2
Stroke among adults2.9%2.7–3.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.3%6.8–10.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.8%5.6–8.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.5%73.4–79.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults74.8%71.2–78.2
Cholesterol screening among adults83.5%81.2–85.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.2%60.7–69.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults66.9%63.6–70.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.7%68.8–82.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults21.9%18.6–25.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.4%11.5–15.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.1%18.8–25.7
Short sleep duration among adults33.3%28.6–38.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.5%13.6–17.6
Frequent mental distress among adults14.3%12.6–16.1
Frequent physical distress among adults11.2%9.9–12.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.1%10.7–13.7
Any disability among adults26.3%23.0–29.9
Hearing disability among adults7.5%6.6–8.4
Independent living disability among adults6.7%6.0–7.6
Mobility disability among adults10.9%9.4–12.4
Self-care disability among adults3.0%2.7–3.3
Vision disability among adults3.9%3.5–4.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.2%17.2–23.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.0%8.4–11.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.0%5.0–7.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.6%7.4–10.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.0%5.3–6.9
Loneliness among adults28.3%24.2–32.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.6%4.7–6.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ND median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.0% (1.0–21.4%) n=380
Uninsured 18–648.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.5% (0.0–19.2%) n=380
No HS diploma (25+)4.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.3% (0.6–13.4%) n=382
Bachelor's or higher (25+)30.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.6% (12.5–41.0%) n=382
Unemployment rate (16+)1.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2741.1% (0.0–6.5%) n=382
Households without a vehicle2.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–7.4%) n=379
Broadband subscription92.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.7% (75.3–98.1%) n=379
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)25.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32215.2% (4.0–28.2%) n=379
Homeownership rate72.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.5% (59.2–98.7%) n=379
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.0% (0.0–4.6%) n=379
Foreign-born population1.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.9% (0.0–5.7%) n=383
Single-parent households52.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08759.3% (40.0–83.3%) n=377
Population 65+16.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55321.6% (9.1–38.9%) n=383
Median age37.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.9 yr (31.1–60.2) n=381
Median household income$80,120$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$79,666 ($56,729–$115,391) n=354
Median home value$277,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$159,750 ($88,870–$297,180) n=328
Median gross rent$1,091$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$767 ($513–$1,222) n=212
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ND median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.0 yr ± 0.8978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.6–84.0) n=379

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.89 years of 80.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured