Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

57744

in Hermosa, South DakotaPopulation 2,421

53.59/ 100

Ranked #11,241 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 35%)

Ranked #167 of 360 South Dakota ZIPs (top 46%)

Ranked #19 of 27 Rapid City, SD ZIPs (bottom 30%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Walkability

0.9 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 2.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST20th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

53.7 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.4 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST87th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3.1 pCi/L

in the top 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST33rd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

18.7 per million

in the bottom 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST21st
US7th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Nitrate in drinking water

0.14%

in the top 8.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

15.5 days/year

in the bottom 12.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US12th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

36.3%

in the top 15% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US85th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$106,250

in the top 15% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US85th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

0.61%

in the top 32% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US68th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

The read

Hermosa, South Dakota (ZIP 57744), on the composite measure, lands in the top 35% healthiest ZIPs nationally (11,241st) and the top 46% of South Dakota (167th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The profile cuts both ways, and the readings bear that out: elder services lands in the top 3.2% nationally, modeled air-toxics cancer risk resides in the bottom 7.0% nationally, and modeled short sleep lies in the bottom 10.5% nationally. Outpatient settles in the top 11.5% nationally, and modeled humid heat stands in the bottom 12.1% nationally. Working the other way, walkability is in the bottom 2.3% nationally, and fatal road crashes rests in the top 3.2% nationally. Modeled radon sits in the top 8.3% nationally, and nitrate registers in the top 8.1% nationally. Modeled fine-particle lands in the top 13.5% nationally.

Set against the neighboring ZIPs, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In everyday language, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Nitrate is a groundwater compound from fertilizer, manure, and sewage, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 57702, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Rapid City, SD metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 67%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 81%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 80%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 45%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 52%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 42%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 58%

11%

Disability

healthier than 51%

7%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 22%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 65%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 62%

14%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 76%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 66%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 51%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 48%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 32%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 31%

11%

Disability

healthier than 31%

7%

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 61%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 65%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 50%

13%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 44%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 26%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 31%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 35%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 31%

11%

Disability

healthier than 28%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.3%27.0–33.7
High blood pressure among adults37.1%33.3–41.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.5%9.6–11.6
Current asthma among adults10.5%9.4–11.7
Coronary heart disease among adults7.8%6.9–8.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.9%6.7–9.2
Depression among adults20.7%18.0–23.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.4%11.7–15.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.0%34.1–42.1
Obesity among adults35.9%29.5–42.9
Stroke among adults4.0%3.5–4.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.3%11.0–15.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.4%7.0–9.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.7%75.8–81.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.9%74.9–80.8
Cholesterol screening among adults87.4%85.9–88.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.7%63.0–71.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults68.8%65.7–71.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.5%69.3–82.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.4%14.9–20.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.2%14.6–20.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.4%21.4–30.1
Short sleep duration among adults30.2%25.3–35.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.6%16.0–21.6
Frequent mental distress among adults14.7%13.0–16.4
Frequent physical distress among adults13.8%12.1–15.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.3%11.7–15.1
Any disability among adults31.2%27.2–35.5
Hearing disability among adults8.9%7.9–10.0
Independent living disability among adults8.1%7.1–9.2
Mobility disability among adults14.7%12.5–17.0
Self-care disability among adults4.2%3.7–4.8
Vision disability among adults5.2%4.6–5.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)SD median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate13.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.8% (1.1–33.5%) n=364
Uninsured 18–6418.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2869.6% (0.0–33.2%) n=365
No HS diploma (25+)4.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.0% (0.8–15.3%) n=366
Bachelor's or higher (25+)39.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.6% (10.3–40.7%) n=366
Unemployment rate (16+)0.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2741.1% (0.0–8.0%) n=365
Households without a vehicle0.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3221.9% (0.0–9.6%) n=364
Broadband subscription77.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.9% (73.7–96.3%) n=364
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)36.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32217.5% (5.2–30.6%) n=364
Homeownership rate91.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.9% (57.2–94.8%) n=364
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.6% (0.0–10.2%) n=364
Foreign-born population0.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.6% (0.0–5.3%) n=367
Single-parent households66.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.7% (32.7–81.4%) n=362
Population 65+19.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.3% (8.4–33.0%) n=367
Median age52.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (27.6–56.7) n=365
Median household income$106,250$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$74,865 ($51,211–$102,582) n=336
Median home value$386,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,400 ($79,000–$321,400) n=311
Median gross rent$1,375$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$763 ($544–$1,089) n=243
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)SD median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.5 yr ± 0.8278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.7 yr (77.4–84.2) n=357

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.82 years of 81.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured