Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

58266

in Niagara, North DakotaPopulation 74

55.85/ 100

Ranked #8,443 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 26%)

Ranked #135 of 371 North Dakota ZIPs (top 36%)

Ranked #10 of 31 Grand Forks, ND-MN ZIPs (top 32%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Distance to a Superfund site

138 mi

in the top 2.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST30th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST15th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3.3 pCi/L

in the top 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST64th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

2.6%

in the bottom 4.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

2.8%

in the top 4.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST78th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Lithium in drinking water

84 µg/L

in the top 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST56th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

2.1%

in the top 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST66th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

71.1%

in the bottom 6.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST7th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

97.2%

in the top 7.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST47th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

The read

Judged by its overall standing, Niagara, North Dakota (ZIP 58266) sits in the top 26% healthiest ZIPs nationally (8,443rd) and the top 36% of North Dakota (135th).

continue reading

A few readings each way define this mixed profile: distance to a Superfund site lands in the top 2.1% nationally, poverty rests at the national minimum, and modeled industrial-pollution burden settles in the bottom 3.4% nationally. Housing-cost burden lands in the bottom 4.2% nationally. Unemployment rests at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Pulling the other way, modeled radon settles in the top 6.2% nationally, and slow internet speeds lands in the top 4.2% nationally. Lithium in drinking water rests in the top 4.3% nationally, and modeled fine-particle settles in the top 4.4% nationally. Home broadband subscription lands in the bottom 6.7% nationally.

Placed beside its immediate neighbors, slow internet speeds runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put plainly, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 58251, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Grand Forks, ND-MN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 78%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 66%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 86%

8%

Disability

healthier than 67%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 88%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 49%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 58%

16%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 28%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 20%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 75%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 74%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 72%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 76%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 44%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 41%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 45%

14%

Disability

healthier than 56%

7%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 35%

8%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 73%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 93%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 93%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 70%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 87%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 47%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 40%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 7%

21%

Disability

healthier than 20%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.8%29.0–34.9
High blood pressure among adults36.8%33.7–40.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.0%10.1–12.1
Current asthma among adults10.3%9.2–11.6
Coronary heart disease among adults7.9%7.0–9.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.0%6.0–8.3
Depression among adults21.3%18.7–24.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.9%10.4–13.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.4%36.1–42.9
Obesity among adults36.1%31.6–41.2
Stroke among adults3.8%3.4–4.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.4%8.4–12.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.6%5.2–8.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.7%79.4–83.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.9%75.1–80.6
Cholesterol screening among adults86.7%85.0–88.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.4%65.5–72.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults68.2%65.2–71.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.2%72.1–83.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.7%17.2–22.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.0%9.8–14.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.5%20.0–27.4
Short sleep duration among adults30.6%26.5–34.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.9%14.6–19.7
Frequent mental distress among adults13.2%11.5–14.9
Frequent physical distress among adults12.5%11.0–14.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.7%10.1–13.5
Any disability among adults29.9%26.4–33.8
Hearing disability among adults9.7%8.6–11.0
Independent living disability among adults7.1%6.1–8.1
Mobility disability among adults13.3%11.5–15.5
Self-care disability among adults3.2%2.8–3.7
Vision disability among adults4.2%3.6–4.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.9%17.1–22.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.6%6.9–10.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults5.3%4.1–6.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.2%5.9–8.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.3%4.5–6.1
Loneliness among adults28.6%25.2–32.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.6%3.8–5.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ND median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate0.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.0% (1.0–21.4%) n=380
Uninsured 18–6420.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.5% (0.0–19.2%) n=380
No HS diploma (25+)0.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.3% (0.6–13.4%) n=382
Bachelor's or higher (25+)10.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.6% (12.5–41.0%) n=382
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2741.1% (0.0–6.5%) n=382
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–7.4%) n=379
Broadband subscription71.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.7% (75.3–98.1%) n=379
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)2.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32215.2% (4.0–28.2%) n=379
Homeownership rate78.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.5% (59.2–98.7%) n=379
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.0% (0.0–4.6%) n=379
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.9% (0.0–5.7%) n=383
Single-parent households56.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08759.3% (40.0–83.3%) n=377
Population 65+44.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55321.6% (9.1–38.9%) n=383
Median age60.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.9 yr (31.1–60.2) n=381
Median household income$88,889$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$79,666 ($56,729–$115,391) n=354
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$159,750 ($88,870–$297,180) n=328
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$767 ($513–$1,222) n=212
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ND median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.9 yr ± 0.9878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.6–84.0) n=379

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.98 years of 78.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured