Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

57702

in Rapid City, South DakotaPopulation 35,595

61.77/ 100

Ranked #3,659 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 11.5%)

Ranked #9 of 360 South Dakota ZIPs (top 2.5%)

Ranked #2 of 27 Rapid City, SD ZIPs (top 7.5%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Park land

53.6%

in the top 2.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3.3 pCi/L

in the top 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST41st
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 4.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US95th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

28.8%

in the bottom 5.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST32nd
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US94th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

19.9 per million

in the bottom 7.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST24th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.12 per 1,000 residents

in the top 8.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

0.45 per 1,000 residents

in the top 9.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST88th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

19.4%

in the top 8.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

5 ppb

in the top 10.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

US90th
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, ZIP 57702, one of several in Rapid City, South Dakota lands in the top 11.5% healthiest ZIPs nationally (3,659th) and the top 2.5% of South Dakota (9th).

continue reading

The picture here is genuinely mixed, with readings on both sides: park land resides in the top 2.2% nationally, and modeled short sleep registers in the bottom 5.2% nationally. Modeled air-toxics cancer risk rests in the bottom 7.8% nationally, and mental-health providers stands in the top 8.8% nationally. Outpatient lies in the top 9.5% nationally. On the other side, modeled radon lands in the top 6.6% nationally, disaster risk sits in the top 4.8% nationally, and expected annual loss is in the top 6.2% nationally. Modeled binge drinking settles in the top 8.8% nationally, and lead in tap water resides in the top 10.0% nationally.

Set beside the nearby areas, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A note on the terms: radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 57706, about 5.2 miles away, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Rapid City, SD metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 70%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 86%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 86%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 79%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 91%

8%

Disability

healthier than 80%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 86%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 75%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 20%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 76%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 97%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 90%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 89%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 92%

8%

Disability

healthier than 88%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 90%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 94%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 8%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 82%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 91%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 73%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 73%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 82%

8%

Disability

healthier than 95%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 64%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 95%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 9%

14%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 81.7 ± 1.2 years. A median household income of $91,457 predicts 79.7 years — 2.0 years above.

    Ranked #931 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 19.8; chronic-disease standing 70.0 — 50 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #14,398 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.0%25.5–30.6
High blood pressure among adults34.9%31.9–38.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.0%10.1–12.0
Current asthma among adults9.8%8.7–11.0
Coronary heart disease among adults6.8%6.2–7.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.0%5.3–6.7
Depression among adults20.0%17.5–22.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.4%10.1–12.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.7%32.5–38.9
Obesity among adults31.4%27.3–35.5
Stroke among adults3.3%3.1–3.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.6%7.9–11.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.4%5.5–7.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.4%76.7–81.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.6%75.8–81.2
Cholesterol screening among adults88.9%87.5–90.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.8%67.1–74.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults74.5%71.9–77.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.6%72.1–82.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.4%16.8–22.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.8%10.3–13.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults20.3%17.8–23.2
Short sleep duration among adults28.8%25.3–32.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults14.4%12.7–16.3
Frequent mental distress among adults12.9%11.5–14.4
Frequent physical distress among adults11.3%10.1–12.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.7%9.6–12.0
Any disability among adults28.4%25.5–31.5
Hearing disability among adults8.3%7.5–9.2
Independent living disability among adults6.3%5.6–7.0
Mobility disability among adults12.3%10.9–13.8
Self-care disability among adults3.0%2.7–3.2
Vision disability among adults3.8%3.4–4.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)SD median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.8% (1.1–33.5%) n=364
Uninsured 18–6410.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2869.6% (0.0–33.2%) n=365
No HS diploma (25+)2.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.0% (0.8–15.3%) n=366
Bachelor's or higher (25+)49.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.6% (10.3–40.7%) n=366
Unemployment rate (16+)2.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2741.1% (0.0–8.0%) n=365
Households without a vehicle3.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3221.9% (0.0–9.6%) n=364
Broadband subscription92.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.9% (73.7–96.3%) n=364
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)24.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32217.5% (5.2–30.6%) n=364
Homeownership rate73.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.9% (57.2–94.8%) n=364
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.6% (0.0–10.2%) n=364
Foreign-born population2.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.6% (0.0–5.3%) n=367
Single-parent households61.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.7% (32.7–81.4%) n=362
Population 65+26.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.3% (8.4–33.0%) n=367
Median age47.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (27.6–56.7) n=365
Median household income$91,457$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$74,865 ($51,211–$102,582) n=336
Median home value$389,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,400 ($79,000–$321,400) n=311
Median gross rent$1,276$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$763 ($544–$1,089) n=243
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)SD median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.7 yr ± 0.6278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.7 yr (77.4–84.2) n=357

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.62 years of 81.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured