Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

57745

in Hill City, South DakotaPopulation 1,894

60.47/ 100

Ranked #4,498 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 14.1%)

Ranked #16 of 360 South Dakota ZIPs (top 4.5%)

Ranked #3 of 27 Rapid City, SD ZIPs (top 11.2%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Park land

88.6%

in the top 0.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.48 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST88th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

5.6 days/year

in the bottom 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

83.1%

in the top 3.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

11 per million

in the bottom 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST16th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

1.7 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 5.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST49th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

10.5%

in the bottom 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

7.4%

in the bottom 10.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

6.3%

in the bottom 12.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US12th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

1.00%

in the bottom 24% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US24th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Hill City, South Dakota (ZIP 57745) sits in the top 14.1% healthiest ZIPs nationally (4,498th) and the top 4.5% of South Dakota (16th).

continue reading

Where the data leans one way, another reading answers it: park land sits in the top 0.3% nationally, elder services registers in the top 2.5% nationally, and modeled humid heat lands in the bottom 3.5% nationally. Modeled tree cover resides in the top 3.8% nationally, and air-toxics cancer risk lies in the bottom 5.6% nationally. Unemployment settles at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Modeled cognitive disability stands in the bottom 7.3% nationally, and short sleep is in the bottom 10.1% nationally. On the other hand, walkability rests in the bottom 5.8% nationally, and distance to a community health center sits in the top 10.8% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. Distance to a community health center is a federally funded (HRSA) community health center serving everyone regardless of ability to pay. ZIP 57702, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Rapid City, SD metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 74%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 70%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 87%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 77%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 94%

8%

Disability

healthier than 75%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 98%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 56%

21%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 9%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 89%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 86%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 92%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 84%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 97%

8%

Disability

healthier than 78%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 48%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 45%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 77%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 77%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 64%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 91%

8%

Disability

healthier than 77%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 55%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 59%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 45%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.6%27.6–33.8
High blood pressure among adults38.0%34.6–41.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.8%10.7–12.9
Current asthma among adults9.8%8.6–11.0
Coronary heart disease among adults7.6%6.7–8.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.7%5.6–7.9
Depression among adults19.2%16.7–21.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.1%11.2–15.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.2%34.8–41.7
Obesity among adults32.7%28.4–37.2
Stroke among adults3.7%3.3–4.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.4%6.0–9.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.1%5.9–8.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.1%78.3–83.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.0%77.2–82.6
Cholesterol screening among adults90.5%89.2–91.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.5%65.6–73.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults70.9%68.1–73.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.1%71.4–82.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.1%15.6–20.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.4%10.1–15.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.7%18.2–25.5
Short sleep duration among adults30.1%26.6–34.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.5%13.2–18.2
Frequent mental distress among adults12.3%10.8–14.0
Frequent physical distress among adults12.2%10.6–14.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.5%9.0–12.1
Any disability among adults29.5%25.8–33.5
Hearing disability among adults8.9%7.8–10.1
Independent living disability among adults6.3%5.4–7.3
Mobility disability among adults13.5%11.5–15.7
Self-care disability among adults3.3%2.8–3.8
Vision disability among adults4.0%3.5–4.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)SD median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate3.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.8% (1.1–33.5%) n=364
Uninsured 18–6422.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2869.6% (0.0–33.2%) n=365
No HS diploma (25+)0.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.0% (0.8–15.3%) n=366
Bachelor's or higher (25+)39.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.6% (10.3–40.7%) n=366
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2741.1% (0.0–8.0%) n=365
Households without a vehicle0.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3221.9% (0.0–9.6%) n=364
Broadband subscription83.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.9% (73.7–96.3%) n=364
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)27.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32217.5% (5.2–30.6%) n=364
Homeownership rate81.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.9% (57.2–94.8%) n=364
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.6% (0.0–10.2%) n=364
Foreign-born population1.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.6% (0.0–5.3%) n=367
Single-parent households60.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.7% (32.7–81.4%) n=362
Population 65+16.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.3% (8.4–33.0%) n=367
Median age40.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (27.6–56.7) n=365
Median household income$88,194$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$74,865 ($51,211–$102,582) n=336
Median home value$343,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,400 ($79,000–$321,400) n=311
Median gross rent$1,196$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$763 ($544–$1,089) n=243
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)SD median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth85.0 yr ± 3.5178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.7 yr (77.4–84.2) n=357

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 3.51 years of 85.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured