Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

57751

in Keystone, South DakotaPopulation 893

60.21/ 100

Ranked #4,700 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 14.7%)

Ranked #18 of 360 South Dakota ZIPs (top 5.0%)

Ranked #4 of 27 Rapid City, SD ZIPs (top 14.9%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Park land

72.6%

in the top 1.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

85.2%

in the top 3.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

11.3%

in the top 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

29.2%

in the bottom 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST41st
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

10.1 days/year

in the bottom 7.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US7th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

10.6%

in the bottom 7.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

7.4%

in the bottom 10.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

6.5%

in the bottom 14.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US14th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

2.3%

in the bottom 19% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US19th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 23% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US23rd
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

The read

Keystone, South Dakota (ZIP 57751) ranks in the top 14.7% healthiest ZIPs nationally (4,700th) and the top 5.0% of South Dakota (18th).

continue reading

Several signals sit on each side of the ledger here: park land settles in the top 1.0% nationally, and modeled tree cover rests in the top 3.0% nationally. Modeled short sleep lands in the bottom 6.5% nationally, and humid heat settles in the bottom 7.2% nationally. Modeled cognitive disability rests in the bottom 7.8% nationally, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility lands in the top 10.9% nationally, and modeled tooth loss settles in the bottom 10.1% nationally. Working the other way, crowded housing rests in the top 3.8% nationally, modeled fine-particle lands in the top 11.7% nationally, and slow internet speeds settles in the top 12.7% nationally.

Against its neighbors, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For context, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 57702, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Rapid City, SD metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 69%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 61%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 91%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 81%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 94%

8%

Disability

healthier than 71%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 95%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 52%

21%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 12%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 84%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 83%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 97%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 93%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 97%

8%

Disability

healthier than 75%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 97%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 41%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 52%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 64%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 91%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 86%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 95%

8%

Disability

healthier than 68%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 82%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 41%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 45%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 55%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.0%28.1–34.1
High blood pressure among adults38.8%35.5–42.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults12.1%10.9–13.3
Current asthma among adults9.7%8.7–10.9
Coronary heart disease among adults8.1%7.1–9.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.0%5.7–8.6
Depression among adults19.1%16.7–21.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.4%11.6–15.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.1%35.7–42.3
Obesity among adults32.3%28.1–36.5
Stroke among adults3.8%3.3–4.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.4%6.0–8.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.5%5.1–8.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.7%78.8–84.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.2%77.6–82.9
Cholesterol screening among adults90.2%88.7–91.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.1%67.3–74.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults72.7%70.1–75.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.2%72.4–83.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.7%15.3–20.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.4%9.9–15.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.7%18.2–25.8
Short sleep duration among adults29.2%25.8–33.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.9%13.3–19.0
Frequent mental distress among adults12.2%10.6–14.0
Frequent physical distress among adults12.3%10.6–14.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.6%9.0–12.4
Any disability among adults29.8%26.1–34.0
Hearing disability among adults9.3%8.1–10.6
Independent living disability among adults6.5%5.4–7.6
Mobility disability among adults13.8%11.6–16.4
Self-care disability among adults3.4%2.8–4.1
Vision disability among adults4.1%3.5–4.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)SD median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.8% (1.1–33.5%) n=364
Uninsured 18–6419.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2869.6% (0.0–33.2%) n=365
No HS diploma (25+)6.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.0% (0.8–15.3%) n=366
Bachelor's or higher (25+)43.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.6% (10.3–40.7%) n=366
Unemployment rate (16+)2.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2741.1% (0.0–8.0%) n=365
Households without a vehicle0.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3221.9% (0.0–9.6%) n=364
Broadband subscription93.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.9% (73.7–96.3%) n=364
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)30.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32217.5% (5.2–30.6%) n=364
Homeownership rate85.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.9% (57.2–94.8%) n=364
Crowded housing (>1 per room)11.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.6% (0.0–10.2%) n=364
Foreign-born population6.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.6% (0.0–5.3%) n=367
Single-parent households57.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.7% (32.7–81.4%) n=362
Population 65+23.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.3% (8.4–33.0%) n=367
Median age54.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (27.6–56.7) n=365
Median household income$97,969$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$74,865 ($51,211–$102,582) n=336
Median home value$473,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,400 ($79,000–$321,400) n=311
Median gross rent$600$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$763 ($544–$1,089) n=243
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)SD median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.3 yr ± 2.3178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.7 yr (77.4–84.2) n=357

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.31 years of 82.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured