Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

55049

in Medford, MinnesotaPopulation 2,636

53.63/ 100

Ranked #11,197 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 35%)

Ranked #439 of 866 Minnesota ZIPs (bottom 49%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Distance to a community health center

29 mi

in the top 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST68th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

7.5%

in the top 13.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US87th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

33%

in the bottom 9.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST21st
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

1.1%

in the top 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US82nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, Medford, Minnesota (ZIP 55049) comes out in the top 35% healthiest ZIPs nationally (11,197th) and the bottom 49% of Minnesota (439th).

continue reading

Several good marks anchor the profile and deserve first mention: modeled high cholesterol registers in the bottom 9.4% nationally, fatal road crashes stands in the bottom 14.0% nationally, and modeled short sleep lands in the bottom 15% nationally. By contrast, distance to a community health center is in the top 4.4% nationally, modeled radon resides in the top 10.2% nationally, and modeled fine-particle rests in the top 10.5% nationally. Modeled transportation noise lies in the top 13.4% nationally, and binge drinking sits in the top 13.4% nationally. Recreation settles at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs. Modeled loud transportation noise registers in the top 18% nationally.

In plain terms, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Distance to a community health center is a federally funded (HRSA) community health center serving everyone regardless of ability to pay. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 55052, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 75%

21%

Disability

healthier than 70%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 82%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 60%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 53%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 54%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 22%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 38%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 5%

5%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 63%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 56%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 53%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 45%

8%

Disability

healthier than 53%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 38%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 13%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 24%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 29%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 22.5; chronic-disease standing 74.7 — 52 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #14,609 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults23.7%20.7–26.8
High blood pressure among adults32.3%28.4–36.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.4%7.6–9.3
Current asthma among adults10.0%8.9–11.3
Coronary heart disease among adults6.3%5.5–7.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.2%5.3–7.2
Depression among adults23.8%20.6–27.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.8%9.3–12.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.0%29.1–37.1
Obesity among adults38.6%31.6–46.0
Stroke among adults3.3%2.9–3.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.8%10.3–15.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.8%7.2–10.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.0%72.8–79.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults73.3%69.3–77.0
Cholesterol screening among adults84.6%82.6–86.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.0%60.2–69.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.1%59.6–66.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.7%71.8–84.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.7%15.6–22.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.8%13.2–18.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.9%20.6–29.6
Short sleep duration among adults31.1%25.6–37.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.6%14.9–20.5
Frequent mental distress among adults15.8%13.8–17.8
Frequent physical distress among adults12.7%11.0–14.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.6%11.8–15.6
Any disability among adults28.1%24.0–32.4
Hearing disability among adults7.2%6.4–8.1
Independent living disability among adults7.5%6.5–8.6
Mobility disability among adults12.4%10.5–14.5
Self-care disability among adults3.5%3.1–4.0
Vision disability among adults4.4%3.9–5.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.7%18.5–25.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.7%10.4–15.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.9%7.2–11.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.1%8.5–12.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.4%6.4–8.6
Loneliness among adults30.7%26.3–35.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.3%5.4–7.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.4% (3.6–16.8%) n=872
Uninsured 18–649.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.2% (2.3–12.7%) n=872
No HS diploma (25+)14.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.5% (2.2–11.2%) n=873
Bachelor's or higher (25+)22.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.4% (13.6–48.8%) n=873
Unemployment rate (16+)2.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.8–7.1%) n=872
Households without a vehicle1.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.4% (0.4–9.1%) n=871
Broadband subscription90.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (81.6–95.3%) n=871
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)19.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.1% (14.0–31.1%) n=871
Homeownership rate86.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.9% (67.0–94.0%) n=871
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.9%) n=871
Foreign-born population10.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.1–11.9%) n=873
Single-parent households43.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.9% (44.1–70.7%) n=870
Population 65+12.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–30.7%) n=873
Median age38.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (35.2–54.3) n=873
Median household income$90,625$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$77,917 ($58,441–$110,840) n=864
Median home value$247,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$234,000 ($132,740–$396,860) n=857
Median gross rent$1,302$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($650–$1,588) n=759
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.8 yr ± 1.2278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.1 yr (78.3–84.8) n=864

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.22 years of 82.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured