Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

55044

in Lakeville, MinnesotaPopulation 64,762

66.36/ 100

Ranked #1,492 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 4.7%)

Ranked #34 of 866 Minnesota ZIPs (top 4.0%)

Ranked #33 of 224 Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI ZIPs (top 14.8%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$141,551

in the top 5.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

27.8%

in the bottom 2.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

0 ppb

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

US1st
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

7.6%

in the bottom 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

27%

in the bottom 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

4.3%

in the bottom 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

8.7%

in the bottom 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

6.9%

in the bottom 6.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Lakeville, Minnesota (ZIP 55044) sits in the top 4.7% healthiest ZIPs nationally (1,492nd) and the top 4.0% of Minnesota (34th).

continue reading

Where the data leans one way, another reading answers it: household income registers in the top 5.0% nationally, modeled short sleep lands in the bottom 2.7% nationally, and lead in tap water resides at the national minimum. Modeled food insecurity lies in the bottom 5.8% nationally, high blood pressure settles in the bottom 4.7% nationally, and coronary heart disease stands in the bottom 4.6% nationally. Modeled mobility disability is in the bottom 4.7% nationally, and housing insecurity rests in the bottom 6.7% nationally. On the other hand, modeled disaster risk sits in the top 1.2% nationally, and expected annual loss registers in the top 3.2% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, expected annual loss runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. ZIP 55123, about 4.0 miles away, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 93%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 96%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 76%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 87%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 72%

8%

Disability

healthier than 96%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 74%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 42%

14%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 30%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 90%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 94%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 72%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 73%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 88%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 84%

8%

Disability

healthier than 96%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 70%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 48%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 74%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 83%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 84%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 72%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 70%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 78%

8%

Disability

healthier than 89%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 69%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 44%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 41.9; chronic-disease standing 93.4 (top 10%) — 52 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #14,541 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults20.3%18.5–22.1
High blood pressure among adults27.0%24.8–29.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.7%7.0–8.3
Current asthma among adults9.8%8.9–10.8
Coronary heart disease among adults4.3%3.9–4.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults3.9%3.5–4.3
Depression among adults23.6%21.3–26.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults8.4%7.4–9.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened32.9%30.4–35.5
Obesity among adults33.4%30.0–36.8
Stroke among adults2.3%2.1–2.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years6.1%5.0–7.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.5%4.8–6.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.3%72.6–77.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults74.9%72.2–77.4
Cholesterol screening among adults87.8%86.4–89.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.9%65.8–71.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults74.0%71.8–76.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years80.3%76.1–84.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.9%16.6–21.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.5%9.2–11.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults19.5%17.4–21.8
Short sleep duration among adults27.8%25.1–30.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults12.4%11.0–13.7
Frequent mental distress among adults13.9%12.5–15.4
Frequent physical distress among adults9.9%8.9–11.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.5%9.4–11.6
Any disability among adults22.6%20.4–24.9
Hearing disability among adults5.1%4.6–5.7
Independent living disability among adults5.4%4.8–5.9
Mobility disability among adults8.7%7.7–9.8
Self-care disability among adults2.3%2.1–2.6
Vision disability among adults2.9%2.6–3.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.3%17.1–21.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.6%6.6–8.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults4.9%4.2–5.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.9%6.0–7.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.2%4.6–5.7
Loneliness among adults28.4%25.6–31.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.5%3.9–5.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate3.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.4% (3.6–16.8%) n=872
Uninsured 18–643.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.2% (2.3–12.7%) n=872
No HS diploma (25+)3.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.5% (2.2–11.2%) n=873
Bachelor's or higher (25+)53.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.4% (13.6–48.8%) n=873
Unemployment rate (16+)2.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.8–7.1%) n=872
Households without a vehicle4.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.4% (0.4–9.1%) n=871
Broadband subscription96.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (81.6–95.3%) n=871
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.1% (14.0–31.1%) n=871
Homeownership rate88.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.9% (67.0–94.0%) n=871
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.9%) n=871
Foreign-born population9.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.1–11.9%) n=873
Single-parent households44.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.9% (44.1–70.7%) n=870
Population 65+11.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–30.7%) n=873
Median age37.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (35.2–54.3) n=873
Median household income$141,551$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$77,917 ($58,441–$110,840) n=864
Median home value$488,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$234,000 ($132,740–$396,860) n=857
Median gross rent$1,826$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($650–$1,588) n=759
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.7 yr ± 0.5578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.1 yr (78.3–84.8) n=864

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.55 years of 80.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured