Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

56244

in Hancock, MinnesotaPopulation 1,832

53.36/ 100

Ranked #11,561 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 36%)

Ranked #469 of 866 Minnesota ZIPs (bottom 46%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fatal road crashes

0 per 100,000 residents per year

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

99.9%

in the top 2.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3.5 pCi/L

in the top 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

34.2 mi

in the top 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST76th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Lithium in drinking water

77 µg/L

in the top 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

1.6%

in the top 6.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST72nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

19.9%

in the top 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

31.9%

in the bottom 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST11th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

9.9%

in the bottom 9.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

The read

Hancock, Minnesota (ZIP 56244), by its overall standing, sits in the top 36% healthiest ZIPs nationally (11,561st) and the bottom 46% of Minnesota (469th).

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides of the ledger for this area: fatal road crashes lands at the national minimum, fiber broadband is in the top 2.2% nationally, and modeled high cholesterol resides in the bottom 6.3% nationally. Housing-cost burden rests in the bottom 9.3% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site lies in the top 13.6% nationally. Set against that, modeled radon sits in the top 4.9% nationally, and distance to a community health center settles in the top 3.2% nationally. Lithium in drinking water registers in the top 4.9% nationally, and modeled fine-particle stands in the top 6.0% nationally. Modeled binge drinking lands in the top 6.6% nationally.

Defined in plain terms, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Lithium in drinking water is a natural metal that dissolves into some groundwater and has no federal drinking-water limit yet. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 56226, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 80%

21%

Disability

healthier than 71%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 71%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 60%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 45%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 44%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 25%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 36%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 3%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 68%

21%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 53%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 45%

14%

Disability

healthier than 55%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 43%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 12%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 13%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 21%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 20%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 25.5; chronic-disease standing 80.2 — 55 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #14,881 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults23.0%20.6–25.4
High blood pressure among adults30.1%26.9–33.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.9%7.3–8.7
Current asthma among adults9.9%8.9–11.0
Coronary heart disease among adults6.0%5.4–6.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.0%5.2–6.9
Depression among adults24.7%21.6–28.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.2%9.0–11.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened31.9%28.6–35.3
Obesity among adults39.5%32.8–46.3
Stroke among adults3.1%2.8–3.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.1%9.3–13.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.3%8.6–12.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure74.8%72.1–77.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults72.1%68.4–75.6
Cholesterol screening among adults82.7%80.7–84.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.6%66.6–74.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.5%60.3–66.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.0%73.0–84.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.9%17.0–23.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.6%13.3–18.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.4%21.6–29.5
Short sleep duration among adults31.0%25.7–37.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.5%15.1–20.0
Frequent mental distress among adults16.3%14.5–18.1
Frequent physical distress among adults12.2%10.8–13.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.2%12.5–16.0
Any disability among adults28.8%25.3–32.7
Hearing disability among adults6.9%6.2–7.7
Independent living disability among adults7.5%6.6–8.5
Mobility disability among adults11.8%10.2–13.5
Self-care disability among adults3.4%3.0–3.8
Vision disability among adults4.3%3.9–4.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.7%18.7–25.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.2%11.0–15.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.7%7.9–11.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.6%8.9–12.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.9%6.8–9.1
Loneliness among adults30.1%25.9–34.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.6%5.6–7.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.4% (3.6–16.8%) n=872
Uninsured 18–6411.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.2% (2.3–12.7%) n=872
No HS diploma (25+)7.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.5% (2.2–11.2%) n=873
Bachelor's or higher (25+)20.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.4% (13.6–48.8%) n=873
Unemployment rate (16+)3.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.8–7.1%) n=872
Households without a vehicle0.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.4% (0.4–9.1%) n=871
Broadband subscription90.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (81.6–95.3%) n=871
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)9.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.1% (14.0–31.1%) n=871
Homeownership rate78.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.9% (67.0–94.0%) n=871
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.9%) n=871
Foreign-born population8.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.1–11.9%) n=873
Single-parent households46.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.9% (44.1–70.7%) n=870
Population 65+14.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–30.7%) n=873
Median age33.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (35.2–54.3) n=873
Median household income$85,417$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$77,917 ($58,441–$110,840) n=864
Median home value$162,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$234,000 ($132,740–$396,860) n=857
Median gross rent$914$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($650–$1,588) n=759
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.3 yr ± 1.2078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.1 yr (78.3–84.8) n=864

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.20 years of 80.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured