ZIP code
56046
in Hope, MinnesotaPopulation 157
55.58/ 100
Ranked #8,769 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 27%)
Ranked #298 of 866 Minnesota ZIPs (top 34%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Distance to a community health center
36.5 mi
in the top 2.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST79thUS97thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.
Full methodology ›Home broadband subscription
100%
at the national maximum
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.
Full methodology ›PFAS in drinking water
7.7%
in the bottom 4.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST7thUS4thDefinition & source ›
The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.
A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.
Full methodology ›Expected annual disaster loss
$0
in the bottom 6.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST4thUS6thDefinition & source ›
FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.
Full methodology ›Fiber broadband
98.3%
in the top 6.2% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST87thUS94thDefinition & source ›
The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.
Full methodology ›Transportation noise
12.2%
in the top 6.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST97thUS94thDefinition & source ›
The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.
Full methodology ›Loud transportation noise
2.2%
in the top 6.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST97thUS94thDefinition & source ›
The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.
Full methodology ›Short sleep
29%
in the bottom 5.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST28thUS6thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.
Full methodology ›Natural-disaster risk
in the bottom 7.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST7thUS7thDefinition & source ›
This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.
Full methodology ›Mammography
80.4%
in the top 9.1% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST88thUS91stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.
Full methodology ›The read
By its overall health score, Hope, Minnesota (ZIP 56046) lands in the top 27% healthiest ZIPs nationally (8,769th) and the top 34% of Minnesota (298th).
A number of signals point in a favorable direction for this area: home broadband subscription stands at the national maximum, and modeled pfas settles in the bottom 4.4% nationally. Modeled expected annual loss lies in the bottom 6.2% nationally, and fiber broadband resides in the top 6.2% nationally. Modeled short sleep lands in the bottom 5.8% nationally, and disaster risk registers in the bottom 7.3% nationally. Unemployment sits at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Working the other way, distance to a community health center rests in the top 2.7% nationally, modeled transportation noise is in the top 6.2% nationally, and modeled loud transportation noise stands in the top 6.3% nationally.
To translate a couple of terms, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 55060, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 61%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 66%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 72%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 66%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 81%
8%
Disability
healthier than 71%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 73%
5%
About typical
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 44%
14%
Holding it back
Healthcare Access
healthier than 1%
5%
Lifting this score
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 61%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 74%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 65%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 94%
8%
About typical
Risk Behavior
healthier than 52%
11%
Disability
healthier than 54%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 46%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 33%
21%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 4%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
55060
Minnesotashares a border
Score 56.34
Closest healthier
55052
Minnesotaabout 14 mi away
Score 57.42
Similar health profile
58362
North Dakota98% similar profile
Score 58.66
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 26.8% | 23.3–30.5 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 36.8% | 32.4–41.4 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 10.5% | 9.4–11.8 |
| Current asthma among adults | 9.5% | 8.4–10.8 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 7.5% | 6.3–8.8 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 6.5% | 5.1–8.1 |
| Depression among adults | 21.6% | 18.4–25.1 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 11.8% | 9.8–14.0 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 36.2% | 32.0–40.6 |
| Obesity among adults | 38.3% | 31.2–46.0 |
| Stroke among adults | 3.7% | 3.0–4.4 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 11.1% | 8.8–13.5 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 6.5% | 4.7–8.9 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 78.9% | 75.4–82.2 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 75.6% | 71.6–79.1 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 88.4% | 86.1–90.2 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 65.1% | 60.6–69.3 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 68.9% | 65.6–71.9 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 80.4% | 73.7–85.8 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 18.4% | 15.3–21.8 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 15.5% | 11.6–19.5 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 23.9% | 18.9–29.8 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 29.0% | 23.7–34.8 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 16.8% | 13.3–20.7 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 14.0% | 11.9–16.1 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 12.9% | 10.8–15.3 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 12.0% | 9.8–14.4 |
| Any disability among adults | 28.3% | 23.6–33.6 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 8.5% | 7.3–9.8 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 6.9% | 5.6–8.4 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 13.1% | 10.5–16.2 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 3.5% | 2.8–4.4 |
| Vision disability among adults | 4.0% | 3.2–4.9 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 21.2% | 17.4–25.3 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 9.3% | 6.8–12.3 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 6.1% | 4.4–8.2 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 7.8% | 5.9–9.7 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 5.9% | 4.7–7.1 |
| Loneliness among adults | 28.5% | 23.9–33.5 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 5.1% | 4.0–6.2 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | MN median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 9.6% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 8.4% (3.6–16.8%) n=872 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 2.5% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 6.2% (2.3–12.7%) n=872 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 2.3% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 5.5% (2.2–11.2%) n=873 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 18.4% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 23.4% (13.6–48.8%) n=873 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 3.2% (0.8–7.1%) n=872 |
| Households without a vehicle | 4.1% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 3.4% (0.4–9.1%) n=871 |
| Broadband subscription | 100.0% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 89.2% (81.6–95.3%) n=871 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 12.2% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 22.1% (14.0–31.1%) n=871 |
| Homeownership rate | 91.8% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 83.9% (67.0–94.0%) n=871 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 1.1% (0.0–3.9%) n=871 |
| Foreign-born population | 3.2% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 1.8% (0.1–11.9%) n=873 |
| Single-parent households | 40.6% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 56.9% (44.1–70.7%) n=870 |
| Population 65+ | 14.0% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 20.2% (12.7–30.7%) n=873 |
| Median age | 27.3 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 42.3 yr (35.2–54.3) n=873 |
| Median household income | $61,042 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $77,917 ($58,441–$110,840) n=864 |
| Median home value | $98,900 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $234,000 ($132,740–$396,860) n=857 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $925 ($650–$1,588) n=759 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | MN median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 85.0 yr ± 2.31 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 81.1 yr (78.3–84.8) n=864 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.31 years of 85.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured