Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

56334

in Glenwood, MinnesotaPopulation 5,776

53.63/ 100

Ranked #11,191 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 35%)

Ranked #438 of 866 Minnesota ZIPs (bottom 49%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Loneliness

27.1%

in the bottom 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.17 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

1.6%

in the top 6.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST72nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

22.3 mi

in the top 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST58th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.17 per 1,000 residents

in the top 8.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST86th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

29.9%

in the bottom 9.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST43rd
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

0.51 per 1,000 residents

in the top 10.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST82nd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

72.7%

in the top 8.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST83rd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

9.4%

in the top 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US84th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

0.69%

in the bottom 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US17th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Glenwood, Minnesota (ZIP 56334) ranks in the top 35% healthiest ZIPs nationally (11,191st) and the bottom 49% of Minnesota (438th).

continue reading

A number of measures place this area on solid footing: modeled loneliness is in the bottom 3.4% nationally. Distance to an emergency room settles at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Mental-health providers resides in the top 5.5% nationally, elder services registers in the top 8.6% nationally, and modeled short sleep rests in the bottom 9.2% nationally. Childcare stands in the top 10.0% nationally, and modeled colon screening lies in the top 8.2% nationally. By contrast, modeled fine-particle lands in the top 6.0% nationally, distance to a community health center sits in the top 7.0% nationally, and modeled radon is in the top 14.2% nationally.

Read against the ZIPs closest to it, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To spell things out, fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Distance to a community health center is a federally funded (HRSA) community health center serving everyone regardless of ability to pay. Close by, ZIP 56289, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 60%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 84%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 71%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 65%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 77%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 46%

21%

Disability

healthier than 52%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 23%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 9%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 87%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 66%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 70%

8%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 53%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 52%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 43%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 13%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 40%

14%

Disability

healthier than 18%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 81.3 ± 1.9 years. A median household income of $69,525 predicts 78.6 years — 2.7 years above.

    Ranked #551 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.2%26.0–32.7
High blood pressure among adults37.7%33.6–41.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.2%10.2–12.3
Current asthma among adults10.1%9.0–11.4
Coronary heart disease among adults8.4%7.5–9.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.5%6.6–8.7
Depression among adults23.7%20.5–27.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.7%11.0–14.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.2%33.1–41.5
Obesity among adults39.4%32.1–47.2
Stroke among adults4.2%3.8–4.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.3%7.5–11.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.1%5.9–8.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.1%78.5–83.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.1%74.8–81.3
Cholesterol screening among adults87.0%85.3–88.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years72.7%68.2–76.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults68.0%64.7–71.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.3%72.4–85.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.3%13.6–19.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.0%12.8–17.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.8%21.6–30.4
Short sleep duration among adults29.9%24.2–36.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.4%16.0–21.3
Frequent mental distress among adults14.7%13.0–16.6
Frequent physical distress among adults13.7%12.1–15.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.0%11.4–14.8
Any disability among adults31.0%27.0–35.4
Hearing disability among adults9.4%8.4–10.6
Independent living disability among adults8.1%7.2–9.3
Mobility disability among adults15.2%13.1–17.5
Self-care disability among adults4.0%3.5–4.5
Vision disability among adults4.8%4.2–5.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.1%17.1–23.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.8%9.0–12.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.5%7.0–10.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.3%7.0–9.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.7%5.8–7.7
Loneliness among adults27.1%22.8–31.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.6%4.7–6.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate11.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.4% (3.6–16.8%) n=872
Uninsured 18–645.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.2% (2.3–12.7%) n=872
No HS diploma (25+)4.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.5% (2.2–11.2%) n=873
Bachelor's or higher (25+)29.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.4% (13.6–48.8%) n=873
Unemployment rate (16+)0.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.8–7.1%) n=872
Households without a vehicle9.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.4% (0.4–9.1%) n=871
Broadband subscription89.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (81.6–95.3%) n=871
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)35.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.1% (14.0–31.1%) n=871
Homeownership rate82.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.9% (67.0–94.0%) n=871
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.9%) n=871
Foreign-born population1.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.1–11.9%) n=873
Single-parent households61.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.9% (44.1–70.7%) n=870
Population 65+28.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–30.7%) n=873
Median age48.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (35.2–54.3) n=873
Median household income$69,525$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$77,917 ($58,441–$110,840) n=864
Median home value$279,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$234,000 ($132,740–$396,860) n=857
Median gross rent$884$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($650–$1,588) n=759
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.3 yr ± 0.9678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.1 yr (78.3–84.8) n=864

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.96 years of 81.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured