Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

50027

in Barnes City, IowaPopulation 148

50.32/ 100

Ranked #15,808 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 49%)

Ranked #636 of 922 Iowa ZIPs (bottom 31%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Radon

3.4 pCi/L

in the top 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST48th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

5.1%

in the bottom 5.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US5th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.02%

in the bottom 6.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

23.6%

in the top 12.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US88th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

57.7%

in the bottom 14.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST3rd
US14th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$52,976

in the bottom 18% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST8th
US18th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, Barnes City, Iowa (ZIP 50027) ranks in the top 49% healthiest ZIPs nationally (15,808th) and the bottom 31% of Iowa (636th).

continue reading

Taken together, the profile's clearest strengths surface right away: housing-cost burden lies in the bottom 5.2% nationally, and modeled transportation noise resides in the bottom 6.0% nationally. Unemployment lands at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Modeled loud transportation noise registers at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Crowded housing sits at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. Against that, modeled radon rests in the top 5.8% nationally. Fiber broadband is at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled arsenic stands in the top 11.8% nationally, and poverty settles in the top 12.4% nationally. Homeownership lies in the bottom 14.0% nationally.

In plainer terms, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 50171, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 76%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 64%

8%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 43%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 49%

14%

Disability

healthier than 52%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 26%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 31%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 40%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 16%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 73%

14%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 55%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 43%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 35%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 27%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 34%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 20%

8%

Disability

healthier than 31%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 21%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.2%27.8–34.6
High blood pressure among adults38.7%34.6–42.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.2%9.2–11.2
Current asthma among adults10.3%9.1–11.5
Coronary heart disease among adults8.2%7.3–9.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.5%7.3–9.9
Depression among adults21.2%18.1–24.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.7%11.0–14.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.2%34.0–42.1
Obesity among adults39.4%32.3–46.6
Stroke among adults4.0%3.6–4.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.0%8.0–12.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.8%5.5–8.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.6%78.0–83.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.2%74.9–81.1
Cholesterol screening among adults85.5%83.7–87.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.9%63.9–73.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults70.6%67.3–73.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.4%71.8–84.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.4%15.4–21.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.0%14.2–19.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.9%24.2–33.6
Short sleep duration among adults33.1%27.1–39.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.8%16.9–22.7
Frequent mental distress among adults16.6%14.6–18.7
Frequent physical distress among adults14.4%12.5–16.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.1%12.2–16.0
Any disability among adults31.0%26.8–35.2
Hearing disability among adults9.0%8.0–10.1
Independent living disability among adults8.1%7.1–9.2
Mobility disability among adults15.1%13.0–17.4
Self-care disability among adults3.9%3.4–4.5
Vision disability among adults4.7%4.1–5.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.5%19.9–27.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.9%9.6–14.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.5%8.4–12.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.1%7.6–10.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.8%5.8–7.8
Loneliness among adults31.4%26.8–36.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.4%5.4–7.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate23.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (2.7–19.1%) n=931
Uninsured 18–6424.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.4% (0.7–14.7%) n=931
No HS diploma (25+)3.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.1% (1.6–12.9%) n=932
Bachelor's or higher (25+)6.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.9% (9.8–36.8%) n=932
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–6.7%) n=932
Households without a vehicle2.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.4% (0.0–7.9%) n=931
Broadband subscription85.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.5% (77.9–95.1%) n=931
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)5.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.2% (9.0–28.8%) n=931
Homeownership rate57.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (66.8–93.5%) n=931
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–3.3%) n=931
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–7.2%) n=932
Single-parent households50.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.8% (43.7–75.5%) n=928
Population 65+28.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–31.0%) n=932
Median age60.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.7 yr (34.1–54.7) n=931
Median household income$52,976$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,848 ($55,055–$102,762) n=911
Median home value$85,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$161,100 ($93,820–$278,170) n=892
Median gross rent$824$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$825 ($614–$1,113) n=771
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.6 yr ± 1.8778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.2–83.4) n=917

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.87 years of 80.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured