Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

50604

in Aplington, IowaPopulation 1,590

52.07/ 100

Ranked #13,366 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 42%)

Ranked #494 of 922 Iowa ZIPs (bottom 46%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fatal road crashes

0 per 100,000 residents per year

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3.3 pCi/L

in the top 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST43rd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

20.4%

in the top 4.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST67th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

8.3%

in the bottom 5.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST15th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Aplington, Iowa (ZIP 50604) lands in the top 42% healthiest ZIPs nationally (13,366th) and the bottom 46% of Iowa (494th).

continue reading

The picture here is genuinely mixed, with readings on both sides: fatal road crashes lands at the national minimum, and modeled pfas sits in the bottom 5.5% nationally. Modeled short sleep is in the bottom 13.0% nationally. Distance to a nursing home settles at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Modeled mammography resides in the top 11.7% nationally. Crowded housing registers at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. On the other side, modeled radon rests in the top 6.8% nationally, modeled binge drinking stands in the top 4.8% nationally, and walkability lies in the bottom 13.5% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility lands at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs.

A note on the terms: radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 50602, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 83%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 76%

8%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 43%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 47%

14%

Disability

healthier than 56%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 31%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 39%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 23%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 70%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 76%

13%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 51%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 59%

8%

Disability

healthier than 41%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 56%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 34%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 35%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 22%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.8%28.5–35.2
High blood pressure among adults38.5%34.6–42.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.7%9.6–11.8
Current asthma among adults9.9%8.8–11.2
Coronary heart disease among adults7.9%6.9–8.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.1%6.9–9.2
Depression among adults20.4%17.6–23.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.3%10.6–14.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.3%34.2–42.6
Obesity among adults39.1%32.0–46.9
Stroke among adults4.0%3.5–4.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.7%11.2–16.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.4%5.2–7.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.2%77.6–82.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.5%76.3–82.6
Cholesterol screening among adults86.1%84.3–87.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.1%65.7–74.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults68.3%65.0–71.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.9%73.7–85.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults20.4%17.3–24.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.2%12.9–17.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.3%22.8–31.9
Short sleep duration among adults30.7%25.6–36.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.8%16.1–21.5
Frequent mental distress among adults15.7%14.0–17.7
Frequent physical distress among adults13.8%12.0–15.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.2%11.5–14.8
Any disability among adults29.3%25.1–33.4
Hearing disability among adults9.0%7.9–10.1
Independent living disability among adults7.9%6.9–9.0
Mobility disability among adults14.9%12.7–17.2
Self-care disability among adults3.7%3.3–4.2
Vision disability among adults4.6%4.0–5.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.9%18.7–25.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.8%9.0–13.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.5%7.8–11.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.3%7.1–9.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.2%5.4–7.2
Loneliness among adults29.8%25.4–34.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.0%5.1–7.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (2.7–19.1%) n=931
Uninsured 18–645.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.4% (0.7–14.7%) n=931
No HS diploma (25+)5.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.1% (1.6–12.9%) n=932
Bachelor's or higher (25+)24.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.9% (9.8–36.8%) n=932
Unemployment rate (16+)0.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–6.7%) n=932
Households without a vehicle0.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.4% (0.0–7.9%) n=931
Broadband subscription87.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.5% (77.9–95.1%) n=931
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)22.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.2% (9.0–28.8%) n=931
Homeownership rate87.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (66.8–93.5%) n=931
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–3.3%) n=931
Foreign-born population2.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–7.2%) n=932
Single-parent households59.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.8% (43.7–75.5%) n=928
Population 65+21.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–31.0%) n=932
Median age41.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.7 yr (34.1–54.7) n=931
Median household income$66,776$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,848 ($55,055–$102,762) n=911
Median home value$168,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$161,100 ($93,820–$278,170) n=892
Median gross rent$627$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$825 ($614–$1,113) n=771
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.4 yr ± 0.8278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.2–83.4) n=917

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.82 years of 80.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured