Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

52731

in Charlotte, IowaPopulation 867

50.31/ 100

Ranked #15,818 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 49%)

Ranked #637 of 922 Iowa ZIPs (bottom 31%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFAS in drinking water

6.3%

in the bottom 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

20.9%

in the top 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST79th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

17.3%

in the top 8.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST79th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

10.8%

in the top 8.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

2.1 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 8.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST4th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

Charlotte, Iowa (ZIP 52731), by its composite score, sits in the top 49% healthiest ZIPs nationally (15,818th) and the bottom 31% of Iowa (637th).

continue reading

The data opens on a genuinely even set of readings: modeled pfas lands in the bottom 2.5% nationally. Households without a vehicle stands at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Modeled transportation noise registers in the bottom 10.7% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise settles at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. On the other side, modeled binge drinking sits in the top 3.5% nationally, modeled arsenic lies in the top 8.1% nationally, and unemployment rests in the top 8.2% nationally. Modeled radon resides in the top 10.2% nationally, walkability is in the bottom 8.2% nationally, and distance to a community health center lands in the top 14.2% nationally.

For anyone unfamiliar, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 52037, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 67%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 69%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 64%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 47%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 55%

14%

Disability

healthier than 54%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 18%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 21%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 14%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 79%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 77%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 44%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 13%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 29%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 13%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 34%

8%

Disability

healthier than 36%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 37%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.9%27.3–34.4
High blood pressure among adults38.4%34.1–42.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.5%8.6–10.6
Current asthma among adults10.1%8.8–11.3
Coronary heart disease among adults7.7%6.8–8.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.4%7.2–9.7
Depression among adults20.4%17.2–23.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.6%10.8–14.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.9%33.4–42.2
Obesity among adults40.2%32.9–47.6
Stroke among adults3.8%3.4–4.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.9%8.8–13.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.3%6.0–9.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.8%75.7–81.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.5%73.8–80.8
Cholesterol screening among adults85.5%83.4–87.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.6%62.6–72.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults67.9%64.5–71.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.5%71.1–84.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults20.9%17.3–24.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.8%15.0–20.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.2%22.6–32.1
Short sleep duration among adults32.5%26.8–38.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.3%16.5–22.4
Frequent mental distress among adults16.6%14.5–18.7
Frequent physical distress among adults14.3%12.4–16.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.0%12.2–16.0
Any disability among adults29.8%25.5–34.2
Hearing disability among adults8.6%7.6–9.6
Independent living disability among adults8.0%7.0–9.2
Mobility disability among adults14.7%12.5–17.2
Self-care disability among adults4.0%3.5–4.5
Vision disability among adults4.7%4.2–5.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.9%19.6–26.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.4%10.2–15.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.2%9.1–13.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.6%8.0–11.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.9%5.9–8.0
Loneliness among adults31.3%26.8–36.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.9%5.9–8.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate13.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (2.7–19.1%) n=931
Uninsured 18–6412.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.4% (0.7–14.7%) n=931
No HS diploma (25+)3.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.1% (1.6–12.9%) n=932
Bachelor's or higher (25+)11.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.9% (9.8–36.8%) n=932
Unemployment rate (16+)10.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–6.7%) n=932
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.4% (0.0–7.9%) n=931
Broadband subscription83.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.5% (77.9–95.1%) n=931
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.2% (9.0–28.8%) n=931
Homeownership rate82.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (66.8–93.5%) n=931
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–3.3%) n=931
Foreign-born population3.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–7.2%) n=932
Single-parent households64.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.8% (43.7–75.5%) n=928
Population 65+17.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–31.0%) n=932
Median age42.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.7 yr (34.1–54.7) n=931
Median household income$87,727$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,848 ($55,055–$102,762) n=911
Median home value$155,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$161,100 ($93,820–$278,170) n=892
Median gross rent$700$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$825 ($614–$1,113) n=771
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth85.2 yr ± 2.5578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.2–83.4) n=917

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.55 years of 85.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured