Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

50219

in Pella, IowaPopulation 14,416

60.48/ 100

Ranked #4,493 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 14.1%)

Ranked #54 of 922 Iowa ZIPs (top 5.9%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Binge drinking

21.1%

in the top 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Lithium in drinking water

94 µg/L

in the top 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

27.4%

in the bottom 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3.4 pCi/L

in the top 6.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST47th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

6.4%

in the bottom 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

4.3%

in the bottom 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

7.8%

in the bottom 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

4.9%

in the bottom 6.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

6.6%

in the bottom 6.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

80.5%

in the top 8.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST86th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Pella, Iowa (ZIP 50219) sits in the top 14.1% healthiest ZIPs nationally (4,493rd) and the top 5.9% of Iowa (54th).

continue reading

What works most in this area's favor shows up clearly across the measures: modeled short sleep settles in the bottom 2.1% nationally, and housing insecurity stands in the bottom 4.0% nationally. Distance to an emergency room is at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Modeled utility shutoff rests in the bottom 5.7% nationally, and food insecurity sits in the bottom 6.6% nationally. Modeled transportation registers in the bottom 6.7% nationally, and tooth loss lands in the bottom 6.7% nationally. Working the other way, modeled binge drinking resides in the top 3.1% nationally, and lithium in drinking water lies in the top 2.9% nationally. Modeled radon settles in the top 6.0% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, lithium in drinking water is a natural metal that dissolves into some groundwater and has no federal drinking-water limit yet. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. No nearby ZIP ranks healthier overall than this one.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 82%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 85%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 77%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 79%

8%

Disability

healthier than 88%

7%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 57%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 50%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 29%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 29%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 94%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 72%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 84%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 98%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 72%

8%

Disability

healthier than 93%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 83%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 42%

14%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 9%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 81.0 ± 1.2 years. A median household income of $86,807 predicts 79.5 years — 1.5 years above.

    Ranked #1,282 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 29.1; chronic-disease standing 82.1 — 53 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #14,689 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.5%22.7–28.7
High blood pressure among adults32.1%28.5–36.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.5%8.7–10.4
Current asthma among adults9.4%8.3–10.6
Coronary heart disease among adults5.8%5.1–6.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.4%4.7–6.2
Depression among adults20.5%17.4–23.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.3%8.0–10.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.9%30.1–37.8
Obesity among adults36.7%30.2–43.7
Stroke among adults2.8%2.5–3.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years6.6%5.4–8.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.1%4.2–6.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.6%74.9–80.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.0%74.4–81.2
Cholesterol screening among adults85.6%83.7–87.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years72.0%67.6–76.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults74.3%71.4–77.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years80.5%74.3–85.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults21.1%17.7–24.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.1%9.4–13.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults20.2%16.8–24.1
Short sleep duration among adults27.4%22.4–33.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults14.0%12.0–16.3
Frequent mental distress among adults15.1%13.2–17.0
Frequent physical distress among adults10.8%9.5–12.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.7%10.1–13.3
Any disability among adults26.1%22.5–30.0
Hearing disability among adults6.9%6.1–7.8
Independent living disability among adults6.0%5.3–6.8
Mobility disability among adults10.7%9.2–12.3
Self-care disability among adults2.5%2.2–2.8
Vision disability among adults3.2%2.9–3.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.3%18.3–24.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.8%6.4–9.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults5.7%4.7–6.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.4%5.4–7.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.9%4.3–5.7
Loneliness among adults30.5%26.0–35.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.3%3.6–4.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (2.7–19.1%) n=931
Uninsured 18–642.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.4% (0.7–14.7%) n=931
No HS diploma (25+)3.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.1% (1.6–12.9%) n=932
Bachelor's or higher (25+)44.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.9% (9.8–36.8%) n=932
Unemployment rate (16+)0.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–6.7%) n=932
Households without a vehicle3.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.4% (0.0–7.9%) n=931
Broadband subscription91.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.5% (77.9–95.1%) n=931
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)19.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.2% (9.0–28.8%) n=931
Homeownership rate69.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (66.8–93.5%) n=931
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–3.3%) n=931
Foreign-born population2.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–7.2%) n=932
Single-parent households55.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.8% (43.7–75.5%) n=928
Population 65+19.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–31.0%) n=932
Median age36.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.7 yr (34.1–54.7) n=931
Median household income$86,807$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,848 ($55,055–$102,762) n=911
Median home value$301,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$161,100 ($93,820–$278,170) n=892
Median gross rent$1,026$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$825 ($614–$1,113) n=771
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.0 yr ± 0.6278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.2–83.4) n=917

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.62 years of 81.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured